Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
{"title":"covid -19后病情的个性化风险评分:贝叶斯有向无环图方法。","authors":"Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen","doi":"10.1111/risa.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized risk score for post-COVID-19 condition: Bayesian directed acyclic graphic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include:
• Human health and safety risks
• Microbial risks
• Engineering
• Mathematical modeling
• Risk characterization
• Risk communication
• Risk management and decision-making
• Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics
• Laws and regulatory policy
• Ecological risks.