covid -19后病情的个性化风险评分:贝叶斯有向无环图方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-07-06 DOI:10.1111/risa.70072
Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
{"title":"covid -19后病情的个性化风险评分:贝叶斯有向无环图方法。","authors":"Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen","doi":"10.1111/risa.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized risk score for post-COVID-19 condition: Bayesian directed acyclic graphic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Chen-Yang Hsu, Tin-Yu Lin, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在后大流行时代,covid -19后病情(PCC)得到了广泛关注。为了解决这个问题,我们利用贝叶斯有向无环图(DAG)模型,基于综合元分析得出的表格数据,为PCC开发了个性化的综合风险评分(CRS)。我们的风险评估模型包含215种风险因素组合,包括个人人口统计和健康相关概况,涉及41项研究,涉及86万多例COVID-19病例。CRS的范围从0到500,将患者分为风险四分位数,并估计SARS-CoV-2变体(包括Wild/D614G/Alpha、Delta和Omicron BA.1/BA.2)的PCC概率。外部验证证明了准确的预测,尽管较高的风险评分显示出轻微的偏差,特别是在BA.5 Omicron子集中。该风险评估模型不仅适用于在SARS-CoV-2亚变体出现时纳入新的证据,而且在促进对PCC患者进行最佳个体化医疗护理和优先考虑PCC早期诊断的风险群体方面非常有价值。值得注意的是,贝叶斯DAG模型的适应性增强了PCC风险预测,使数据集成能够适应不断变化的SARS-CoV-2背景,并为高危人群的医疗资源分配提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalized risk score for post-COVID-19 condition: Bayesian directed acyclic graphic approach.

Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) has gained traction currently in the post-pandemic era. To address this, we utilized a Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model to develop a personalized composite risk score (CRS) for PCC, based on the tabular data derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis. Our risk assessment model incorporates 215 combinations of risk factors, including personal demographic and health-related profiles, across 41 studies involving over 860,000 COVID-19 cases. The CRS ranges from 0 to 500, categorizing patients into risk quartiles and estimating PCC probability across SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns, including Wild/D614G/Alpha, Delta, and Omicron BA.1/BA.2. External validation demonstrated accurate predictions, though higher risk scores showed slight deviations, particularly in BA.5 Omicron subset. The risk assessment model is not only adaptable for incorporating new evidence as SARS-CoV-2 subvariants emerge but also very valuable in facilitating the optimal individualized medical care for PCC patients and prioritizing a spectrum of risk groups for early PCC diagnosis. Notably, the adaptability of Bayesian DAG model enhances PCC risk prediction, enabling data integration for evolving SARS-CoV-2 contexts and informing healthcare resource allocation for high-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信