我的压力是否过大?不同试验环境下面包小麦对盐胁迫的响应模式和程度不同。

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Direct Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1002/pld3.70088
Anne Plessis
{"title":"我的压力是否过大?不同试验环境下面包小麦对盐胁迫的响应模式和程度不同。","authors":"Anne Plessis","doi":"10.1002/pld3.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adopting crops and agricultural practices that help sustain yield under abiotic stress will be a major element of future food security under climate change. However, little of the intensive research into the mechanisms of plant abiotic stress response has translated into improved yield stability. A suspected obstacle to translatability of research findings in this area is artificial experimental conditions, but we lack evidence to support this explanation. Here, we combined a meta-analysis and an experimental approach to compare the effect of salt stress on wheat yield, growth, and physiology across four distinct experimental settings: field/field-like conditions, potted plants in a climate chamber, in a greenhouse, and outdoors. The meta-analysis, comparing responses relative to control conditions over similar ranges of salt stress intensity, confirmed that field conditions led to more limited impact on yield than in the other three experimental settings and uncovered differences in how shoot and root biomass are relatively affected by salt stress between greenhouse and outdoors pot experiments. In our experiment, we identified very distinct responses for each of the four experimental settings, with plants outdoors accumulating more Na<sup>+</sup> and proline than plants indoors, and shoot growth and yield were least affected by stress in field-like conditions and most affected in the climate chambers. Together, these results suggest that the nature of the acclimation mechanisms used by wheat to face salt stress can depend on the experimental setting. While our findings need confirmation for other crops and abiotic stresses, we recommend renewed attention to the conditions under which experiments are carried out and to favor more realistic growth conditions when possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20230,"journal":{"name":"Plant Direct","volume":"9 7","pages":"e70088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is My Stress Out of Place? Bread Wheat Response to Saline Stress Varies in Pattern and Extent Across Experimental Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pld3.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adopting crops and agricultural practices that help sustain yield under abiotic stress will be a major element of future food security under climate change. However, little of the intensive research into the mechanisms of plant abiotic stress response has translated into improved yield stability. A suspected obstacle to translatability of research findings in this area is artificial experimental conditions, but we lack evidence to support this explanation. Here, we combined a meta-analysis and an experimental approach to compare the effect of salt stress on wheat yield, growth, and physiology across four distinct experimental settings: field/field-like conditions, potted plants in a climate chamber, in a greenhouse, and outdoors. The meta-analysis, comparing responses relative to control conditions over similar ranges of salt stress intensity, confirmed that field conditions led to more limited impact on yield than in the other three experimental settings and uncovered differences in how shoot and root biomass are relatively affected by salt stress between greenhouse and outdoors pot experiments. In our experiment, we identified very distinct responses for each of the four experimental settings, with plants outdoors accumulating more Na<sup>+</sup> and proline than plants indoors, and shoot growth and yield were least affected by stress in field-like conditions and most affected in the climate chambers. Together, these results suggest that the nature of the acclimation mechanisms used by wheat to face salt stress can depend on the experimental setting. While our findings need confirmation for other crops and abiotic stresses, we recommend renewed attention to the conditions under which experiments are carried out and to favor more realistic growth conditions when possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Direct\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"e70088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用有助于在非生物胁迫下维持产量的作物和农业做法将是气候变化下未来粮食安全的一个主要因素。然而,对植物非生物胁迫响应机制的深入研究很少转化为提高产量稳定性。在这一领域的研究成果的可翻译性的一个怀疑障碍是人为的实验条件,但我们缺乏证据来支持这一解释。在这里,我们将荟萃分析和实验方法结合起来,在四种不同的实验环境下比较盐胁迫对小麦产量、生长和生理的影响:田间/类田间条件、气候室盆栽、温室和室外。荟萃分析比较了在相似盐胁迫强度范围内相对于对照条件下的反应,证实了田间条件对产量的影响比其他三种试验条件下的影响更有限,并揭示了温室和室外盆栽试验对盐胁迫对茎和根生物量的相对影响。在我们的实验中,我们发现在四种不同的实验环境下,植物在室外比在室内积累更多的Na+和脯氨酸,并且在类似大田的条件下,植物的生长和产量受胁迫的影响最小,而在气候室中受胁迫的影响最大。综上所述,这些结果表明小麦面对盐胁迫的驯化机制的性质可能取决于实验环境。虽然我们的发现需要在其他作物和非生物胁迫下得到证实,但我们建议重新关注进行实验的条件,并在可能的情况下倾向于更现实的生长条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is My Stress Out of Place? Bread Wheat Response to Saline Stress Varies in Pattern and Extent Across Experimental Settings.

Adopting crops and agricultural practices that help sustain yield under abiotic stress will be a major element of future food security under climate change. However, little of the intensive research into the mechanisms of plant abiotic stress response has translated into improved yield stability. A suspected obstacle to translatability of research findings in this area is artificial experimental conditions, but we lack evidence to support this explanation. Here, we combined a meta-analysis and an experimental approach to compare the effect of salt stress on wheat yield, growth, and physiology across four distinct experimental settings: field/field-like conditions, potted plants in a climate chamber, in a greenhouse, and outdoors. The meta-analysis, comparing responses relative to control conditions over similar ranges of salt stress intensity, confirmed that field conditions led to more limited impact on yield than in the other three experimental settings and uncovered differences in how shoot and root biomass are relatively affected by salt stress between greenhouse and outdoors pot experiments. In our experiment, we identified very distinct responses for each of the four experimental settings, with plants outdoors accumulating more Na+ and proline than plants indoors, and shoot growth and yield were least affected by stress in field-like conditions and most affected in the climate chambers. Together, these results suggest that the nature of the acclimation mechanisms used by wheat to face salt stress can depend on the experimental setting. While our findings need confirmation for other crops and abiotic stresses, we recommend renewed attention to the conditions under which experiments are carried out and to favor more realistic growth conditions when possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Direct
Plant Direct Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
101
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Direct is a monthly, sound science journal for the plant sciences that gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting work dealing with a variety of subjects. Topics include but are not limited to genetics, biochemistry, development, cell biology, biotic stress, abiotic stress, genomics, phenomics, bioinformatics, physiology, molecular biology, and evolution. A collaborative journal launched by the American Society of Plant Biologists, the Society for Experimental Biology and Wiley, Plant Direct publishes papers submitted directly to the journal as well as those referred from a select group of the societies’ journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信