脱髓鞘神经病变中姿势控制的代偿:CMT1A优于CIDP的视觉整合。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Loïc Dupont, Arnaud Delval, Luc Defebvre, Jean-Baptiste Davion, Cédrick T Bonnet, Céline Tard
{"title":"脱髓鞘神经病变中姿势控制的代偿:CMT1A优于CIDP的视觉整合。","authors":"Loïc Dupont, Arnaud Delval, Luc Defebvre, Jean-Baptiste Davion, Cédrick T Bonnet, Céline Tard","doi":"10.1159/000547256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Demyelinating neuropathies, such as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A), significantly impair postural control. While both conditions affect sensory integration, differences in compensatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore how visual, proprioceptive, and cognitive perturbations influence postural stability in CIDP and CMT1A patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective study was conducted with 25 CIDP and 24 CMT1A patients. Posturographic recordings were used to assess postural stability under standard conditions and during visual tracking, proprioceptive perturbation (Achilles tendon vibration), and cognitive dual-tasking (backward counting). Center of Pressure (CoP) parameters, including area, velocity, and body sway, were analyzed to evaluate postural control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMT1A patients demonstrated improved postural stability during visual tracking tasks, suggesting better visual integration and long-term compensatory adaptations. In contrast, CIDP patients showed greater postural instability and reliance on static visual cues. Both groups experienced increased postural sway during proprioceptive and cognitive perturbations, with no significant differences between them in dual-tasking performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights distinct postural control mechanisms in CIDP and CMT1A patients. CMT1A patients exhibit better adaptation to visual disturbances while CIDP patients struggle with visual integration and rely more on static visual cues. This difference reflects the progressive nature of CMT1A, which may facilitate better development of compensatory strategies over time. These findings underscore the need for personalized rehabilitation approaches, focusing on visual integration for CIDP patients and reinforcing compensatory mechanisms in CMT1A patients to enhance balance and reduce fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19115,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensation of postural control in demyelinating neuropathies: better visual integration in CMT1A than in CIDP.\",\"authors\":\"Loïc Dupont, Arnaud Delval, Luc Defebvre, Jean-Baptiste Davion, Cédrick T Bonnet, Céline Tard\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Demyelinating neuropathies, such as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A), significantly impair postural control. While both conditions affect sensory integration, differences in compensatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore how visual, proprioceptive, and cognitive perturbations influence postural stability in CIDP and CMT1A patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective study was conducted with 25 CIDP and 24 CMT1A patients. Posturographic recordings were used to assess postural stability under standard conditions and during visual tracking, proprioceptive perturbation (Achilles tendon vibration), and cognitive dual-tasking (backward counting). Center of Pressure (CoP) parameters, including area, velocity, and body sway, were analyzed to evaluate postural control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMT1A patients demonstrated improved postural stability during visual tracking tasks, suggesting better visual integration and long-term compensatory adaptations. In contrast, CIDP patients showed greater postural instability and reliance on static visual cues. Both groups experienced increased postural sway during proprioceptive and cognitive perturbations, with no significant differences between them in dual-tasking performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights distinct postural control mechanisms in CIDP and CMT1A patients. CMT1A patients exhibit better adaptation to visual disturbances while CIDP patients struggle with visual integration and rely more on static visual cues. This difference reflects the progressive nature of CMT1A, which may facilitate better development of compensatory strategies over time. These findings underscore the need for personalized rehabilitation approaches, focusing on visual integration for CIDP patients and reinforcing compensatory mechanisms in CMT1A patients to enhance balance and reduce fall risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurodegenerative Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurodegenerative Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脱髓鞘神经病变,如慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变(CIDP)和charcote - marie - tooth 1A型(CMT1A),显著损害姿势控制。虽然这两种情况都会影响感觉统合,但代偿机制的差异仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨视觉、本体感受和认知扰动如何影响CIDP和CMT1A患者的姿势稳定性。方法:采用单中心前瞻性研究,纳入25例CIDP和24例CMT1A患者。姿势记录用于评估标准条件下、视觉跟踪、本体感觉扰动(跟腱振动)和认知双重任务(向后计数)期间的姿势稳定性。分析压力中心(CoP)参数,包括面积、速度和身体摆动,以评估姿势控制。结果:CMT1A患者在视觉跟踪任务中表现出更好的姿势稳定性,表明更好的视觉整合和长期代偿适应。相比之下,CIDP患者表现出更大的姿势不稳定和对静态视觉线索的依赖。在本体感觉和认知扰动中,两组的姿势摇摆都有所增加,但在双任务表现上没有显著差异。结论:本研究突出了CIDP和CMT1A患者不同的姿势控制机制。CMT1A患者对视觉障碍表现出更好的适应性,而CIDP患者在视觉整合方面存在困难,更多地依赖于静态视觉线索。这种差异反映了CMT1A的进行性,随着时间的推移,这可能有助于更好地发展代偿策略。这些发现强调了个性化康复方法的必要性,重点关注CIDP患者的视觉整合,并加强CMT1A患者的代偿机制,以增强平衡和降低跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensation of postural control in demyelinating neuropathies: better visual integration in CMT1A than in CIDP.

Introduction: Demyelinating neuropathies, such as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A), significantly impair postural control. While both conditions affect sensory integration, differences in compensatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore how visual, proprioceptive, and cognitive perturbations influence postural stability in CIDP and CMT1A patients.

Methods: A single-center, prospective study was conducted with 25 CIDP and 24 CMT1A patients. Posturographic recordings were used to assess postural stability under standard conditions and during visual tracking, proprioceptive perturbation (Achilles tendon vibration), and cognitive dual-tasking (backward counting). Center of Pressure (CoP) parameters, including area, velocity, and body sway, were analyzed to evaluate postural control.

Results: CMT1A patients demonstrated improved postural stability during visual tracking tasks, suggesting better visual integration and long-term compensatory adaptations. In contrast, CIDP patients showed greater postural instability and reliance on static visual cues. Both groups experienced increased postural sway during proprioceptive and cognitive perturbations, with no significant differences between them in dual-tasking performance.

Conclusion: The study highlights distinct postural control mechanisms in CIDP and CMT1A patients. CMT1A patients exhibit better adaptation to visual disturbances while CIDP patients struggle with visual integration and rely more on static visual cues. This difference reflects the progressive nature of CMT1A, which may facilitate better development of compensatory strategies over time. These findings underscore the need for personalized rehabilitation approaches, focusing on visual integration for CIDP patients and reinforcing compensatory mechanisms in CMT1A patients to enhance balance and reduce fall risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neurodegenerative Diseases'' is a bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal for the publication of advances in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington''s disease and related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信