预测黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移的临床病理和基因表达模型的验证:一项多中心丹麦队列研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Marie B. Weitemeyer, Neel M. Helvind, Siri Klausen, Erik Clasen-Linde, Grethe Schmidt, Annette H. Chakera, Lisbet R. Hölmich
{"title":"预测黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结转移的临床病理和基因表达模型的验证:一项多中心丹麦队列研究。","authors":"Marie B. Weitemeyer,&nbsp;Neel M. Helvind,&nbsp;Siri Klausen,&nbsp;Erik Clasen-Linde,&nbsp;Grethe Schmidt,&nbsp;Annette H. Chakera,&nbsp;Lisbet R. Hölmich","doi":"10.1002/jso.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for staging and managing melanoma, but selecting patients for SLNB is challenging, with around 80% of procedures yielding negative results. The clinicopathological and gene expression profile model (CP-GEP) was developed to identify low-risk melanoma patients who may forgo SLNB. CP-GEP combines Breslow thickness, patient age, and a gene expression analysis to classify patients as high- or low-risk for nodal metastasis. This study aimed to validate the performance of CP-GEP in a multicenter Danish cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Primary melanoma tissue from 536 T1-T3 patients who had undergone SLNB was retrospectively analyzed using CP-GEP. Results were compared with SLNB status and the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram (MIA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>T1, T2, and T3 melanomas comprised 32.8%, 46.8%, and 20.3% of cases, respectively. The SLNB positivity rate was 18.1%. Overall, 40.9% was classified as CP-GEP low-risk (NPV 91.3%). Among T1 and T2 subgroups, 72.7% and 35.5% were low-risk, with NPVs of 94.5% and 87.6%, respectively. For 507 patients with MIA scores, CP-GEP identified 42.4% as low-risk (NPV 91.2%) versus 8.1% by MIA (NPV 95.1%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CP-GEP is a promising tool for supporting deselection of SLNB in melanoma patients, with a potential reduction rate of over 40%.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"132 3","pages":"447-455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jso.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression Model for Predicting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Melanoma: A Multicenter Danish Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Marie B. Weitemeyer,&nbsp;Neel M. Helvind,&nbsp;Siri Klausen,&nbsp;Erik Clasen-Linde,&nbsp;Grethe Schmidt,&nbsp;Annette H. Chakera,&nbsp;Lisbet R. Hölmich\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for staging and managing melanoma, but selecting patients for SLNB is challenging, with around 80% of procedures yielding negative results. The clinicopathological and gene expression profile model (CP-GEP) was developed to identify low-risk melanoma patients who may forgo SLNB. CP-GEP combines Breslow thickness, patient age, and a gene expression analysis to classify patients as high- or low-risk for nodal metastasis. This study aimed to validate the performance of CP-GEP in a multicenter Danish cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary melanoma tissue from 536 T1-T3 patients who had undergone SLNB was retrospectively analyzed using CP-GEP. Results were compared with SLNB status and the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram (MIA).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>T1, T2, and T3 melanomas comprised 32.8%, 46.8%, and 20.3% of cases, respectively. The SLNB positivity rate was 18.1%. Overall, 40.9% was classified as CP-GEP low-risk (NPV 91.3%). Among T1 and T2 subgroups, 72.7% and 35.5% were low-risk, with NPVs of 94.5% and 87.6%, respectively. For 507 patients with MIA scores, CP-GEP identified 42.4% as low-risk (NPV 91.2%) versus 8.1% by MIA (NPV 95.1%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>CP-GEP is a promising tool for supporting deselection of SLNB in melanoma patients, with a potential reduction rate of over 40%.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"132 3\",\"pages\":\"447-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jso.70035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.70035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)对于黑色素瘤的分期和治疗至关重要,但选择进行SLNB的患者具有挑战性,约80%的手术结果为阴性。开发了临床病理和基因表达谱模型(CP-GEP)来识别可能放弃SLNB的低风险黑色素瘤患者。CP-GEP结合Breslow厚度、患者年龄和基因表达分析,将患者划分为淋巴结转移的高风险或低风险。本研究旨在验证CP-GEP在丹麦多中心队列中的表现。方法:采用CP-GEP对536例接受SLNB手术的T1-T3患者的原发性黑色素瘤组织进行回顾性分析。将结果与SLNB状态和澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所nomogram (MIA)进行比较。结果:T1、T2和T3黑色素瘤分别占32.8%、46.8%和20.3%。SLNB阳性率为18.1%。总体而言,40.9%的患者被归为CP-GEP低风险(NPV为91.3%)。T1亚组和T2亚组中低危者分别为72.7%和35.5%,npv分别为94.5%和87.6%。在507例MIA评分患者中,CP-GEP鉴定42.4%为低风险(NPV为91.2%),而MIA为8.1% (NPV为95.1%)。结论:CP-GEP是一种很有前景的工具,支持黑色素瘤患者取消SLNB的选择,潜在的减少率超过40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression Model for Predicting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Melanoma: A Multicenter Danish Cohort Study

Validation of a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression Model for Predicting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Melanoma: A Multicenter Danish Cohort Study

Validation of a Clinicopathologic and Gene Expression Model for Predicting Sentinel Node Metastasis in Melanoma: A Multicenter Danish Cohort Study

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is crucial for staging and managing melanoma, but selecting patients for SLNB is challenging, with around 80% of procedures yielding negative results. The clinicopathological and gene expression profile model (CP-GEP) was developed to identify low-risk melanoma patients who may forgo SLNB. CP-GEP combines Breslow thickness, patient age, and a gene expression analysis to classify patients as high- or low-risk for nodal metastasis. This study aimed to validate the performance of CP-GEP in a multicenter Danish cohort.

Method

Primary melanoma tissue from 536 T1-T3 patients who had undergone SLNB was retrospectively analyzed using CP-GEP. Results were compared with SLNB status and the Melanoma Institute Australia nomogram (MIA).

Results

T1, T2, and T3 melanomas comprised 32.8%, 46.8%, and 20.3% of cases, respectively. The SLNB positivity rate was 18.1%. Overall, 40.9% was classified as CP-GEP low-risk (NPV 91.3%). Among T1 and T2 subgroups, 72.7% and 35.5% were low-risk, with NPVs of 94.5% and 87.6%, respectively. For 507 patients with MIA scores, CP-GEP identified 42.4% as low-risk (NPV 91.2%) versus 8.1% by MIA (NPV 95.1%).

Conclusion

CP-GEP is a promising tool for supporting deselection of SLNB in melanoma patients, with a potential reduction rate of over 40%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信