Ran Liu, Jihong Wang, Qiong Wang, Yi Zhang, Fengjuan Yuan
{"title":"米非司酮相关的胎儿心脏不良事件:来自上市后安全性报告的发现","authors":"Ran Liu, Jihong Wang, Qiong Wang, Yi Zhang, Fengjuan Yuan","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2528093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics of mifepristone-associated congenital and foetal cardiac adverse events using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2016 to Q4 2022. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Bayesian Information Component (IC) to detect potential associations between mifepristone and congenital or foetal cardiac adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,130 reports involving mifepristone were identified, of which 18 (1.59%) were related to congenital or foetal cardiac events. Most reports originated from the United States. The most frequently reported events were foetal arrhythmia and foetal heart rate disorder. Notably, foetal arrhythmia showed the strongest signal (IC = 3.13, CI<sub>025</sub> = 1.37). No disproportional signals were detected for structural cardiac malformations. A partial assessment of the Bradford Hill criteria suggested a possible association with functional cardiac anomalies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not identify an association between mifepristone exposure and structural congenital heart defects. However, a positive signal for transient foetal heart rhythm abnormalities was observed. Clinicians should remain vigilant for foetal heart rate irregularities following maternal mifepristone use and consider enhanced cardiac monitoring during labour and delivery to enable early detection and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2528093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mifepristone-related foetal cardiac adverse events: findings from the postmarketing safety reports.\",\"authors\":\"Ran Liu, Jihong Wang, Qiong Wang, Yi Zhang, Fengjuan Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01443615.2025.2528093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics of mifepristone-associated congenital and foetal cardiac adverse events using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2016 to Q4 2022. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Bayesian Information Component (IC) to detect potential associations between mifepristone and congenital or foetal cardiac adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,130 reports involving mifepristone were identified, of which 18 (1.59%) were related to congenital or foetal cardiac events. Most reports originated from the United States. The most frequently reported events were foetal arrhythmia and foetal heart rate disorder. Notably, foetal arrhythmia showed the strongest signal (IC = 3.13, CI<sub>025</sub> = 1.37). No disproportional signals were detected for structural cardiac malformations. A partial assessment of the Bradford Hill criteria suggested a possible association with functional cardiac anomalies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not identify an association between mifepristone exposure and structural congenital heart defects. However, a positive signal for transient foetal heart rhythm abnormalities was observed. Clinicians should remain vigilant for foetal heart rate irregularities following maternal mifepristone use and consider enhanced cardiac monitoring during labour and delivery to enable early detection and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"2528093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2528093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2528093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mifepristone-related foetal cardiac adverse events: findings from the postmarketing safety reports.
Background: This study aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics of mifepristone-associated congenital and foetal cardiac adverse events using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2016 to Q4 2022. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Bayesian Information Component (IC) to detect potential associations between mifepristone and congenital or foetal cardiac adverse events.
Results: A total of 1,130 reports involving mifepristone were identified, of which 18 (1.59%) were related to congenital or foetal cardiac events. Most reports originated from the United States. The most frequently reported events were foetal arrhythmia and foetal heart rate disorder. Notably, foetal arrhythmia showed the strongest signal (IC = 3.13, CI025 = 1.37). No disproportional signals were detected for structural cardiac malformations. A partial assessment of the Bradford Hill criteria suggested a possible association with functional cardiac anomalies.
Conclusion: This study did not identify an association between mifepristone exposure and structural congenital heart defects. However, a positive signal for transient foetal heart rhythm abnormalities was observed. Clinicians should remain vigilant for foetal heart rate irregularities following maternal mifepristone use and consider enhanced cardiac monitoring during labour and delivery to enable early detection and management.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.