迷迭香酸作为抗氧化剂对树脂复合材料与漂白牙釉质剪切结合强度的影响。

Q2 Dentistry
Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour, Majid Akbari, Moona Zamanpour, Atefeh Nemati-Karimooy, Arsalan Shahri, Mehrzad Khorshid
{"title":"迷迭香酸作为抗氧化剂对树脂复合材料与漂白牙釉质剪切结合强度的影响。","authors":"Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour, Majid Akbari, Moona Zamanpour, Atefeh Nemati-Karimooy, Arsalan Shahri, Mehrzad Khorshid","doi":"10.4317/jced.62309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth bleaching, a routine esthetic dental procedure, can compromise bond strength to enamel and dentin, especially if composite restorations are bonded immediately post-bleaching due to residual peroxide and free radicals. To address this, various treatments, including antioxidants like sodium ascorbate (SA), have been used, though SA may increase bacterial accumulation. Rosmarinic acid (RA), an alternative antioxidant, offers additional antibacterial and adhesive benefits. This study evaluates the effect of RA application time on shear bond strength (SBS) in bleached enamel, comparing its efficacy with SA under varying treatment durations. Three null hypotheses regarding RA's impact on SBS are tested.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The labial surfaces of 60 freshly extracted bovine incisors were randomly assigned into 6 groups and subjected to a specific surface treatment as follows: no bleaching procedure (NBL), bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide (BL), BL+ 10% sodium ascorbate for 10 min (SA), BL+ RA for 10 seconds (RA1), 60 seconds (RA2) and 10 min (RA3). The resin composite was bonded to enamels s immediately after these treatments. After storage in water for 24 hours, the bonded samples were mounted on a universal testing machine and loaded to the fracture point. Data analysis was performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, One-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NBL group had the highest SBS, comparable only to SA (<i>P</i>= 0.908). SA outperformed all RA groups (<i>P</i>< 0.001). RA3 showed the lowest SBS, significantly lower than RA1 (<i>P</i>= 0.011). The main fracture mode in all research groups was adhesive failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rosmarinic acid was not able to reverse the bond strength to enamel immediately after the bleaching process, regardless of the duration of application. <b>Key words:</b>Antioxidant agents, Dental bleaching, Enamel, Rosmarinic acid, Shear bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 6","pages":"e619-e626"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation the Effect of Rosmarinic Acid as an Antioxidant Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Bleached Enamel.\",\"authors\":\"Hamideh Sadat Mohammadipour, Majid Akbari, Moona Zamanpour, Atefeh Nemati-Karimooy, Arsalan Shahri, Mehrzad Khorshid\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth bleaching, a routine esthetic dental procedure, can compromise bond strength to enamel and dentin, especially if composite restorations are bonded immediately post-bleaching due to residual peroxide and free radicals. To address this, various treatments, including antioxidants like sodium ascorbate (SA), have been used, though SA may increase bacterial accumulation. Rosmarinic acid (RA), an alternative antioxidant, offers additional antibacterial and adhesive benefits. This study evaluates the effect of RA application time on shear bond strength (SBS) in bleached enamel, comparing its efficacy with SA under varying treatment durations. Three null hypotheses regarding RA's impact on SBS are tested.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The labial surfaces of 60 freshly extracted bovine incisors were randomly assigned into 6 groups and subjected to a specific surface treatment as follows: no bleaching procedure (NBL), bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide (BL), BL+ 10% sodium ascorbate for 10 min (SA), BL+ RA for 10 seconds (RA1), 60 seconds (RA2) and 10 min (RA3). The resin composite was bonded to enamels s immediately after these treatments. After storage in water for 24 hours, the bonded samples were mounted on a universal testing machine and loaded to the fracture point. Data analysis was performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, One-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NBL group had the highest SBS, comparable only to SA (<i>P</i>= 0.908). SA outperformed all RA groups (<i>P</i>< 0.001). RA3 showed the lowest SBS, significantly lower than RA1 (<i>P</i>= 0.011). The main fracture mode in all research groups was adhesive failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rosmarinic acid was not able to reverse the bond strength to enamel immediately after the bleaching process, regardless of the duration of application. <b>Key words:</b>Antioxidant agents, Dental bleaching, Enamel, Rosmarinic acid, Shear bond strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"e619-e626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225771/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙齿漂白是一种常规的牙科美容手术,会损害牙釉质和牙本质的结合强度,特别是当复合修复体在漂白后由于残留的过氧化物和自由基而立即结合时。为了解决这个问题,已经使用了各种治疗方法,包括抗坏血酸钠(SA)等抗氧化剂,尽管SA可能会增加细菌的积累。迷迭香酸(RA),另一种抗氧化剂,提供额外的抗菌和粘接的好处。本研究评估了RA应用时间对漂白牙釉质剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响,并比较了RA与SA在不同处理时间下的效果。对RA对SBS影响的三个零假设进行了检验。材料与方法:将60例新鲜提取的牛切牙唇面随机分为6组,分别进行不漂白(NBL)、38%过氧化氢(BL)、BL+ 10%抗坏血酸钠漂白10 min (SA)、BL+ RA漂白10 s (RA1)、60 s (RA2)和10 min (RA3)的表面处理。这些处理后,树脂复合材料立即粘合到搪瓷上。将粘结后的试样在水中保存24小时后,安装在万能试验机上,加载至断裂点。数据分析采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov、Lilliefors、单因素方差分析和game - howell检验。结果:NBL组SBS最高,仅次于SA组(P= 0.908)。SA优于RA组(P< 0.001)。RA3的SBS最低,显著低于RA1 (P= 0.011)。各研究组的主要断裂方式均为粘接失效。结论:迷迭香酸不能在漂白后立即逆转牙釉质的结合强度,与使用时间无关。关键词:抗氧化剂,牙齿漂白,牙釉质,迷迭香酸,剪切强度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation the Effect of Rosmarinic Acid as an Antioxidant Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Bleached Enamel.

Evaluation the Effect of Rosmarinic Acid as an Antioxidant Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Bleached Enamel.

Background: Tooth bleaching, a routine esthetic dental procedure, can compromise bond strength to enamel and dentin, especially if composite restorations are bonded immediately post-bleaching due to residual peroxide and free radicals. To address this, various treatments, including antioxidants like sodium ascorbate (SA), have been used, though SA may increase bacterial accumulation. Rosmarinic acid (RA), an alternative antioxidant, offers additional antibacterial and adhesive benefits. This study evaluates the effect of RA application time on shear bond strength (SBS) in bleached enamel, comparing its efficacy with SA under varying treatment durations. Three null hypotheses regarding RA's impact on SBS are tested.

Material and methods: The labial surfaces of 60 freshly extracted bovine incisors were randomly assigned into 6 groups and subjected to a specific surface treatment as follows: no bleaching procedure (NBL), bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide (BL), BL+ 10% sodium ascorbate for 10 min (SA), BL+ RA for 10 seconds (RA1), 60 seconds (RA2) and 10 min (RA3). The resin composite was bonded to enamels s immediately after these treatments. After storage in water for 24 hours, the bonded samples were mounted on a universal testing machine and loaded to the fracture point. Data analysis was performed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, One-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell tests.

Results: The NBL group had the highest SBS, comparable only to SA (P= 0.908). SA outperformed all RA groups (P< 0.001). RA3 showed the lowest SBS, significantly lower than RA1 (P= 0.011). The main fracture mode in all research groups was adhesive failure.

Conclusions: Rosmarinic acid was not able to reverse the bond strength to enamel immediately after the bleaching process, regardless of the duration of application. Key words:Antioxidant agents, Dental bleaching, Enamel, Rosmarinic acid, Shear bond strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信