Gustavo César Feitosa Vidal, Edson Philippe Bezerra Balbino, José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira, Natanael Barbosa Dos Santos, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento, Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas, Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas, Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto
{"title":"巴西红蜂胶对甲基丙烯酸酯基粘结剂微拉伸粘结强度和密封性能的影响。","authors":"Gustavo César Feitosa Vidal, Edson Philippe Bezerra Balbino, José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira, Natanael Barbosa Dos Santos, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento, Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas, Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas, Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto","doi":"10.4317/jced.62587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to analyze the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a dental adhesive with propolis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Red propolis extract was added to an experimental methacrylate-based adhesive (EA) at following concentrations: 100 (EA PV100), 250 (EA PV250) e 500 μg/mL (EA PV500). Single Bond Universal adhesive (SB) and EA without propolis were used as controls. The effectiveness of the dentin sealing was evaluated at nanoscale (silver uptake) and microscale (dye microleakage). Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured 24 hours after the bonding process. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EA PV500 showed the best coronal sealing, with better performance than the control and the commercial adhesive. Immediate µTBS values ranged from 28.94 + 9.25 MPa (EA PV100) to 39.09 + 9.60 MPa (SB). Comparing SB and EA with propolis, a significant decrease in µTBS was noted (<i>p</i><0.05). The EA without propolis had similar performance to SB (<i>p</i>=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nanoleakage and microleakage were not eliminated in any of the groups, but EA PV500 µg/mL exhibited the best sealing ability, with superior performance compared to the control and commercial adhesive. A decrease in μTBS of AE with propolis was observed. <b>Key words:</b>Dentin-bonding agents, Propolis, Dental materials, Dental marginal adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 6","pages":"e665-e674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Brazilian red propolis on microtensile bond strength and sealing ability of the methacrylate-based bonding agents.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo César Feitosa Vidal, Edson Philippe Bezerra Balbino, José Marcos Dos Santos Oliveira, Natanael Barbosa Dos Santos, Teresa de Lisieux Guedes Ferreira Lôbo, Ticiano Gomes do Nascimento, Johnnatan Duarte de Freitas, Jeniffer Mclaine Duarte de Freitas, Isabel Cristina Celerino de Moraes Porto\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to analyze the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a dental adhesive with propolis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Red propolis extract was added to an experimental methacrylate-based adhesive (EA) at following concentrations: 100 (EA PV100), 250 (EA PV250) e 500 μg/mL (EA PV500). Single Bond Universal adhesive (SB) and EA without propolis were used as controls. The effectiveness of the dentin sealing was evaluated at nanoscale (silver uptake) and microscale (dye microleakage). Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured 24 hours after the bonding process. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EA PV500 showed the best coronal sealing, with better performance than the control and the commercial adhesive. Immediate µTBS values ranged from 28.94 + 9.25 MPa (EA PV100) to 39.09 + 9.60 MPa (SB). Comparing SB and EA with propolis, a significant decrease in µTBS was noted (<i>p</i><0.05). The EA without propolis had similar performance to SB (<i>p</i>=1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nanoleakage and microleakage were not eliminated in any of the groups, but EA PV500 µg/mL exhibited the best sealing ability, with superior performance compared to the control and commercial adhesive. A decrease in μTBS of AE with propolis was observed. <b>Key words:</b>Dentin-bonding agents, Propolis, Dental materials, Dental marginal adaptation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"e665-e674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Brazilian red propolis on microtensile bond strength and sealing ability of the methacrylate-based bonding agents.
Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the sealing ability and microtensile bond strength of a dental adhesive with propolis.
Material and methods: Red propolis extract was added to an experimental methacrylate-based adhesive (EA) at following concentrations: 100 (EA PV100), 250 (EA PV250) e 500 μg/mL (EA PV500). Single Bond Universal adhesive (SB) and EA without propolis were used as controls. The effectiveness of the dentin sealing was evaluated at nanoscale (silver uptake) and microscale (dye microleakage). Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured 24 hours after the bonding process. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).
Results: EA PV500 showed the best coronal sealing, with better performance than the control and the commercial adhesive. Immediate µTBS values ranged from 28.94 + 9.25 MPa (EA PV100) to 39.09 + 9.60 MPa (SB). Comparing SB and EA with propolis, a significant decrease in µTBS was noted (p<0.05). The EA without propolis had similar performance to SB (p=1.000).
Conclusions: Nanoleakage and microleakage were not eliminated in any of the groups, but EA PV500 µg/mL exhibited the best sealing ability, with superior performance compared to the control and commercial adhesive. A decrease in μTBS of AE with propolis was observed. Key words:Dentin-bonding agents, Propolis, Dental materials, Dental marginal adaptation.
期刊介绍：
Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
