化学固化常规玻璃离聚体在发光二极管辐射增强后的临床评价:一项随机对照临床试验。

Q2 Dentistry
Eman Awad Ebrahim, Basma Hosny Mohamed, Ola Mohamed Ibrahim Fahmy, Rehab Khalil Safy
{"title":"化学固化常规玻璃离聚体在发光二极管辐射增强后的临床评价:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Eman Awad Ebrahim, Basma Hosny Mohamed, Ola Mohamed Ibrahim Fahmy, Rehab Khalil Safy","doi":"10.4317/jced.62440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing the clinical efficiency of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations, regarding both functional and biological properties immediately, after 6 months and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-two healthy patients were selected where each patient had two oclusso- mesial cavities in upper or lower second permanent molar. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities were prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth was restored with chemically cured conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth was restored by the same material enhanced with radiant heat light emitting diode (LED) (M2 group). Functional and biological criteria of each restoration was clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chi-squared and Wilcoxon's signed rank test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups for the tested properties at baseline and 6 months follow-up time. At 12 months of follow-up time, 55% of M1 group and 95% of M2 group were clinically successful with significant difference between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemically cured conventional GIC enhanced with LED radiant heat exhibited better clinical performance than the same material without enhancement at 12 months of follow-up time. <b>Key words:</b>Chemically cured glass ionomer cements (GICs), Radiant heat enhancement, Light emitting diode (LED), Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), Federation Dentaire International criteria for assessment of dental restorations (FDI criteria).</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 6","pages":"e635-e641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer after Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Awad Ebrahim, Basma Hosny Mohamed, Ola Mohamed Ibrahim Fahmy, Rehab Khalil Safy\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing the clinical efficiency of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations, regarding both functional and biological properties immediately, after 6 months and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Twenty-two healthy patients were selected where each patient had two oclusso- mesial cavities in upper or lower second permanent molar. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities were prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth was restored with chemically cured conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth was restored by the same material enhanced with radiant heat light emitting diode (LED) (M2 group). Functional and biological criteria of each restoration was clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chi-squared and Wilcoxon's signed rank test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups for the tested properties at baseline and 6 months follow-up time. At 12 months of follow-up time, 55% of M1 group and 95% of M2 group were clinically successful with significant difference between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chemically cured conventional GIC enhanced with LED radiant heat exhibited better clinical performance than the same material without enhancement at 12 months of follow-up time. <b>Key words:</b>Chemically cured glass ionomer cements (GICs), Radiant heat enhancement, Light emitting diode (LED), Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), Federation Dentaire International criteria for assessment of dental restorations (FDI criteria).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"e635-e641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12225768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:采用国际牙医联合会(FDI)评估口腔修复体修复后6个月和12个月的功能和生物学特性的标准,评估化学固化的传统玻璃离聚体在发光二极管辐射热增强后的临床疗效。材料和方法:选择22例健康患者,每例患者在上、下第二恒磨牙有2个近中牙腔。所有选择的牙齿都准备了标准化的近中牙腔,每个患者的第一颗牙齿都使用化学固化的常规玻璃离子水门合剂(gic)修复,没有任何增强(M1组)。同时,用同样的材料,用辐射热发光二极管(LED) (M2组)增强修复第二颗牙。每个修复体的功能和生物学标准在修复后立即(T0), 6个月后(T1)和12个月后(T2)进行临床评估,使用国际牙医联合会(FDI)评估牙科修复体的标准。结果:卡方检验和Wilcoxon's有符号秩检验显示,两组在基线和随访6个月时的测试特性无统计学差异。随访12个月时,M1组临床成功率为55%,M2组临床成功率为95%,差异有统计学意义。结论:经过12个月的随访,化学固化的常规GIC经LED辐射热强化后的临床表现优于未经强化的同种材料。关键词:化学固化玻璃离子水泥(gic),辐射热增强,发光二极管(LED),随机对照临床试验(RCT),联邦牙医协会(Federation Dentaire)国际口腔修复评估标准(FDI标准)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer after Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer after Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Clinical Evaluation of Chemically Cured Conventional Glass Ionomer after Light Emitting Diode Radiant Heat Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Assessing the clinical efficiency of chemically cured conventional glass ionomer after light-emitting diode radiant heat enhancement using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations, regarding both functional and biological properties immediately, after 6 months and 12 months.

Material and methods: Twenty-two healthy patients were selected where each patient had two oclusso- mesial cavities in upper or lower second permanent molar. Standardized oclusso- mesial cavities were prepared for all the selected teeth, for each patient the first tooth was restored with chemically cured conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs) without any enhancement (M1 group). Meanwhile, the second tooth was restored by the same material enhanced with radiant heat light emitting diode (LED) (M2 group). Functional and biological criteria of each restoration was clinically evaluated immediately after restoration (T0), six months later (T1), and after 12 months (T2) using Federation Dentaire International (FDI) criteria for assessment of dental restorations.

Results: Chi-squared and Wilcoxon's signed rank test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between both groups for the tested properties at baseline and 6 months follow-up time. At 12 months of follow-up time, 55% of M1 group and 95% of M2 group were clinically successful with significant difference between them.

Conclusions: Chemically cured conventional GIC enhanced with LED radiant heat exhibited better clinical performance than the same material without enhancement at 12 months of follow-up time. Key words:Chemically cured glass ionomer cements (GICs), Radiant heat enhancement, Light emitting diode (LED), Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT), Federation Dentaire International criteria for assessment of dental restorations (FDI criteria).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信