非网状分厚移植物的止血网促进移植物的融合和愈合。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
José Ignacio Fonseca-Sada, Alan Amado Méndez-Pérez, Daniel Salas-Treviño, Hernán Jesus Chacón-Moreno, Enrique Quevedo-Fernández, Everardo Valdés-Flores, Yanko Castro-Govea, Cynthia Minerva-González Cantú
{"title":"非网状分厚移植物的止血网促进移植物的融合和愈合。","authors":"José Ignacio Fonseca-Sada, Alan Amado Méndez-Pérez, Daniel Salas-Treviño, Hernán Jesus Chacón-Moreno, Enrique Quevedo-Fernández, Everardo Valdés-Flores, Yanko Castro-Govea, Cynthia Minerva-González Cantú","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin grafts are essential in reconstructive surgery, although complications such as hematomas, seromas, infections, and shear forces can compromise their success. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a hemostatic net fixation technique to improve graft integration and reduce complications. Fifteen patients treated with non-meshed split-thickness grafts fixed using continuous sutures forming a hemostatic net were compared to meshed grafts fixed with staples or sutures along the edges (traditional technique). Both treatments were applied to split wound areas in the same patient. Six months of follow-up, assessing graft integration, aesthetic appearance, and complications, were reported. No patients experienced hematomas, seromas, or infections, and all grafts integrated successfully. Additionally, a blinded panel of plastic surgeons rated the aesthetic appearance of the two techniques. The aesthetic appearance was evaluated with higher scores in the grafts fixed with a hemostatic net. In conclusion, the fixation of skin grafts using a hemostatic net improves integration and aesthetic outcomes while minimizing complications such as hematoma or seroma. Further studies with more surgical areas are needed to confirm these benefits. The technique could represent a significant advancement in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, optimizing clinical and cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemostatic Net in Non-Meshed Split-Thickness Grafts Enhances Graft Integration and Healing.\",\"authors\":\"José Ignacio Fonseca-Sada, Alan Amado Méndez-Pérez, Daniel Salas-Treviño, Hernán Jesus Chacón-Moreno, Enrique Quevedo-Fernández, Everardo Valdés-Flores, Yanko Castro-Govea, Cynthia Minerva-González Cantú\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skin grafts are essential in reconstructive surgery, although complications such as hematomas, seromas, infections, and shear forces can compromise their success. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a hemostatic net fixation technique to improve graft integration and reduce complications. Fifteen patients treated with non-meshed split-thickness grafts fixed using continuous sutures forming a hemostatic net were compared to meshed grafts fixed with staples or sutures along the edges (traditional technique). Both treatments were applied to split wound areas in the same patient. Six months of follow-up, assessing graft integration, aesthetic appearance, and complications, were reported. No patients experienced hematomas, seromas, or infections, and all grafts integrated successfully. Additionally, a blinded panel of plastic surgeons rated the aesthetic appearance of the two techniques. The aesthetic appearance was evaluated with higher scores in the grafts fixed with a hemostatic net. In conclusion, the fixation of skin grafts using a hemostatic net improves integration and aesthetic outcomes while minimizing complications such as hematoma or seroma. Further studies with more surgical areas are needed to confirm these benefits. The technique could represent a significant advancement in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, optimizing clinical and cosmetic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤移植在重建手术中是必不可少的,尽管血肿、血清肿、感染和剪切力等并发症会影响手术的成功。本研究评估了止血网固定技术在改善移植物融合和减少并发症方面的有效性。我们将15例采用连续缝合形成止血网的无网裂厚移植物与采用钉钉固定或沿边缘缝合(传统技术)的有网移植物进行比较。两种治疗方法均应用于同一患者的裂开伤口区域。随访6个月,评估移植物融合、美观和并发症。没有患者出现血肿、血清肿或感染,所有移植物均成功整合。此外,一个由整形外科医生组成的盲法小组对这两种技术的美学外观进行了评分。用止血网固定的移植物的美观评分较高。总之,使用止血网固定皮肤移植物可以改善整合和美观效果,同时减少血肿或血肿等并发症。需要更多手术区域的进一步研究来证实这些益处。这项技术可以代表重建和美容手术的重大进步,优化临床和美容结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemostatic Net in Non-Meshed Split-Thickness Grafts Enhances Graft Integration and Healing.

Skin grafts are essential in reconstructive surgery, although complications such as hematomas, seromas, infections, and shear forces can compromise their success. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a hemostatic net fixation technique to improve graft integration and reduce complications. Fifteen patients treated with non-meshed split-thickness grafts fixed using continuous sutures forming a hemostatic net were compared to meshed grafts fixed with staples or sutures along the edges (traditional technique). Both treatments were applied to split wound areas in the same patient. Six months of follow-up, assessing graft integration, aesthetic appearance, and complications, were reported. No patients experienced hematomas, seromas, or infections, and all grafts integrated successfully. Additionally, a blinded panel of plastic surgeons rated the aesthetic appearance of the two techniques. The aesthetic appearance was evaluated with higher scores in the grafts fixed with a hemostatic net. In conclusion, the fixation of skin grafts using a hemostatic net improves integration and aesthetic outcomes while minimizing complications such as hematoma or seroma. Further studies with more surgical areas are needed to confirm these benefits. The technique could represent a significant advancement in reconstructive and aesthetic surgery, optimizing clinical and cosmetic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信