Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang
{"title":"治疗负担与自我护理的时间关系及其对收缩压和高血压控制的影响。","authors":"Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S517281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, <i>P</i><0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all <i>P</i><0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (<i>P</i><0.001) and 11.1% (<i>P</i><0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"3597-3607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Relationship Between Treatment Burden and Self-Care and Its Impact on Systolic Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control.\",\"authors\":\"Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S517281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, <i>P</i><0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all <i>P</i><0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (<i>P</i><0.001) and 11.1% (<i>P</i><0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3597-3607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S517281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S517281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal Relationship Between Treatment Burden and Self-Care and Its Impact on Systolic Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control.
Background: Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.
Objective: This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.
Methods: We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).
Results: After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, P<0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all P<0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (P<0.001) and 11.1% (P<0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.
Conclusion: Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.