治疗负担与自我护理的时间关系及其对收缩压和高血压控制的影响。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S517281
Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang
{"title":"治疗负担与自我护理的时间关系及其对收缩压和高血压控制的影响。","authors":"Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S517281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, <i>P</i><0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all <i>P</i><0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (<i>P</i><0.001) and 11.1% (<i>P</i><0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"3597-3607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Relationship Between Treatment Burden and Self-Care and Its Impact on Systolic Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control.\",\"authors\":\"Zhihui Jia, Zimin Niu, Yao Jie Xie, Zhiran Su, Jia Ji Wang, Jose Hernandez, Yu Ting Li, Harry H X Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S517281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, <i>P</i><0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all <i>P</i><0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (<i>P</i><0.001) and 11.1% (<i>P</i><0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"3597-3607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S517281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S517281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有效的血压控制需要持续坚持自我保健制度;然而,过度的治疗负担可能损害依从性。治疗负担和自我保健行为之间的纵向动态关系尚不清楚,特别是对时间关系如何影响血压控制的理解有限。目的:本研究旨在探讨治疗负担与自我护理之间的时间关系,同时调查它们对收缩压水平和高血压控制的集体纵向影响。方法:对1718例高血压患者(平均年龄54.6±11.9岁;28.5%合并糖尿病)。在两个时间点(T1和T2)测量治疗负担和自我护理,间隔约11个月,并在随后的14个月(T3)测量血压。我们采用交叉滞后面板模型和中介分析来检验治疗负担和自我护理之间的时间关系(从T1到T2)以及它们对收缩压和高血压控制(T3)的共同影响。结果:在调整协变量后,我们观察到总样本中治疗负担(T1)和自我照顾(T2)之间存在显著的交叉滞后路径系数(路径系数= -0.089,ppppp)。结论:我们的研究结果建立了一个时间序列,即治疗负担升高导致自我照顾能力次优,而次优又对随后的血压控制产生不利影响。这种关联的性质为进一步的初级保健研究打开了大门,以制定更可持续的高血压管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Relationship Between Treatment Burden and Self-Care and Its Impact on Systolic Blood Pressure and Hypertension Control.

Background: Effective blood pressure (BP) control necessitates sustained adherence to self-care regimes; however, adherence can be undermined by excessive treatment burden. The longitudinal dynamics between treatment burden and self-care behaviours remain less understood, with particularly limited understanding of how the temporal relationship may influence BP control.

Objective: This study sought to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care while investigating their collective longitudinal impact on both systolic BP levels and hypertension control.

Methods: We investigated a community-based longitudinal cohort of 1718 hypertensive patients (mean age 54.6 ± 11.9 years; 28.5% with coexisting diabetes). Treatment burden and self-care were measured at two time points (T1 and T2), separated by an approximate 11-month period, with BP measured in the subsequent 14 months (T3). We employed cross-lagged panel modelling and mediation analysis to examine the temporal relationship between treatment burden and self-care (from T1 to T2) and their collective influence on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3).

Results: After adjusting for covariates, we observed a significant cross-lagged path coefficient between treatment burden (T1) and self-care (T2) in the total sample (path coefficient = -0.089, P<0.001). The association remained consistent across subgroups-including individuals aged less than 60 years (path coefficient = -0.083), aged 60 years and above (path coefficient = -0.113), diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.103), and non-diabetic patients (path coefficient = -0.085), with all P<0.001. The mediation analyses demonstrated that self-care (T2) accounted for 10.7% (P<0.001) and 11.1% (P<0.001) of the total effect of treatment burden (T1) on systolic BP and hypertension control (T3), respectively.

Conclusion: Our study findings establish a temporal sequence wherein elevated treatment burden precedes suboptimal self-care capacity, which in turn adversely affects subsequent BP control. The nature of such association opens the door for further primary care research on developing more sustainable hypertension management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信