使用重复低水平红光治疗近视管理装置后短期色觉变化的评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-06 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2025.2523912
Baasimah Batool, Christopher Davey, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Declan Mckeefry, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad
{"title":"使用重复低水平红光治疗近视管理装置后短期色觉变化的评价。","authors":"Baasimah Batool, Christopher Davey, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Declan Mckeefry, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2025.2523912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is an emerging technique for managing myopia progression. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, but uncertainties remain on its effect on immediate vision perception. This study evaluated the impact of RLRL on short-term color vision perception and choroidal thickness. Attitudes towards RLRL were also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty participants underwent color vision assessment using the Colour Assessment Diagnosis (CAD) test and macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine their eligibility and establish baseline measures for color vision perception threshold and choroidal thickness, with color vision perception measured using chromatic displacement (CD). Participants then underwent three sessions of RLRL, at the required time intervals as per manufacturer guidance. After each session, the CAD test was performed immediately, and repeated after a 5-minute interval. At the final visit, the OCT scan was retaken, and participants were asked about their experience of using RLRL. CD was measured and compared before and after RLRL exposure, to identify if there was any differences following usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in color perception sensitivity was observed immediately after exposure to RLRL at each visit (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for all), which returned to baseline levels after 5 min. Three sessions of RLRL caused no change compared to baseline color perception (<i>p</i> = 0.054). There was no significant difference in the mean choroidal thickness in the left eye; the right eye showed a small reduction in macular choroidal thickness 5.1 µm (± 8.551 µm SD, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Participant feedback demonstrated a generally positive response, indicating people would consider using RLRL for myopia management if recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There appears to be only a temporary impact of RLRL on color vision perception, which returns to baseline after 5 min. Furthermore, feedback suggests that UK populations may be receptive to RLRL if prescribed to them by an eye care practitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1173-1180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Short-Term Color Vision Perception Changes After Using a Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy Myopia Management Device.\",\"authors\":\"Baasimah Batool, Christopher Davey, Annegret Dahlmann-Noor, Declan Mckeefry, Neema Ghorbani-Mojarrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02713683.2025.2523912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is an emerging technique for managing myopia progression. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, but uncertainties remain on its effect on immediate vision perception. This study evaluated the impact of RLRL on short-term color vision perception and choroidal thickness. Attitudes towards RLRL were also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty participants underwent color vision assessment using the Colour Assessment Diagnosis (CAD) test and macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine their eligibility and establish baseline measures for color vision perception threshold and choroidal thickness, with color vision perception measured using chromatic displacement (CD). Participants then underwent three sessions of RLRL, at the required time intervals as per manufacturer guidance. After each session, the CAD test was performed immediately, and repeated after a 5-minute interval. At the final visit, the OCT scan was retaken, and participants were asked about their experience of using RLRL. CD was measured and compared before and after RLRL exposure, to identify if there was any differences following usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in color perception sensitivity was observed immediately after exposure to RLRL at each visit (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for all), which returned to baseline levels after 5 min. Three sessions of RLRL caused no change compared to baseline color perception (<i>p</i> = 0.054). There was no significant difference in the mean choroidal thickness in the left eye; the right eye showed a small reduction in macular choroidal thickness 5.1 µm (± 8.551 µm SD, <i>p</i> = 0.015). Participant feedback demonstrated a generally positive response, indicating people would consider using RLRL for myopia management if recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There appears to be only a temporary impact of RLRL on color vision perception, which returns to baseline after 5 min. Furthermore, feedback suggests that UK populations may be receptive to RLRL if prescribed to them by an eye care practitioner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1173-1180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2523912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2523912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:重复低水平红灯(RLRL)治疗是一种控制近视进展的新兴技术。临床试验已证明其有效性,但其对即时视觉感知的影响仍不确定。本研究评估了RLRL对短期色觉和脉络膜厚度的影响。还探讨了对RLRL的态度。方法:采用色彩评估诊断(CAD)测试和黄斑光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对20名参与者进行色觉评估,以确定他们的资格,并建立色觉感知阈值和脉络膜厚度的基线测量,色觉感知使用色位移(CD)测量。然后,参与者按照制造商指导要求的时间间隔进行三次RLRL。每次治疗结束后,立即进行CAD测试,每隔5分钟重复一次。在最后一次访问时,重新进行OCT扫描,并询问参与者使用RLRL的体验。在接触RLRL前后测量并比较CD,以确定使用后是否有任何差异。结果:每次就诊时暴露于RLRL后立即观察到显着降低的颜色感知灵敏度(p p = 0.054)。两组患者左眼脉络膜平均厚度差异无统计学意义;右眼黄斑脉络膜厚度减小5.1µm(±8.551µm SD, p = 0.015)。参与者的反馈显示出普遍的积极反应,表明如果推荐,人们会考虑使用RLRL治疗近视。结论:RLRL对色觉知觉的影响似乎只是暂时的,在5分钟后恢复到基线。此外,反馈表明,如果由眼科医生开处方,英国人可能会接受RLRL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Short-Term Color Vision Perception Changes After Using a Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy Myopia Management Device.

Purpose: Repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is an emerging technique for managing myopia progression. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy, but uncertainties remain on its effect on immediate vision perception. This study evaluated the impact of RLRL on short-term color vision perception and choroidal thickness. Attitudes towards RLRL were also explored.

Methods: Twenty participants underwent color vision assessment using the Colour Assessment Diagnosis (CAD) test and macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) to determine their eligibility and establish baseline measures for color vision perception threshold and choroidal thickness, with color vision perception measured using chromatic displacement (CD). Participants then underwent three sessions of RLRL, at the required time intervals as per manufacturer guidance. After each session, the CAD test was performed immediately, and repeated after a 5-minute interval. At the final visit, the OCT scan was retaken, and participants were asked about their experience of using RLRL. CD was measured and compared before and after RLRL exposure, to identify if there was any differences following usage.

Results: A significant reduction in color perception sensitivity was observed immediately after exposure to RLRL at each visit (p < 0.001 for all), which returned to baseline levels after 5 min. Three sessions of RLRL caused no change compared to baseline color perception (p = 0.054). There was no significant difference in the mean choroidal thickness in the left eye; the right eye showed a small reduction in macular choroidal thickness 5.1 µm (± 8.551 µm SD, p = 0.015). Participant feedback demonstrated a generally positive response, indicating people would consider using RLRL for myopia management if recommended.

Conclusions: There appears to be only a temporary impact of RLRL on color vision perception, which returns to baseline after 5 min. Furthermore, feedback suggests that UK populations may be receptive to RLRL if prescribed to them by an eye care practitioner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信