乳腺癌术后化疗患者情绪表达冲突的潜在特征分析及其影响因素

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Management and Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S509857
Zhaoxia Tian, Ruishan Sheng, Yutong Zhang, Hongmei Li
{"title":"乳腺癌术后化疗患者情绪表达冲突的潜在特征分析及其影响因素","authors":"Zhaoxia Tian, Ruishan Sheng, Yutong Zhang, Hongmei Li","doi":"10.2147/CMAR.S509857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emotional expression conflicts, characterized by approach-avoidance dilemmas in self-disclosure, are prevalent among breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. This study identifies emotional expression conflict subtypes and their predictors to inform targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study employed convenience sampling to recruit 238 postoperative breast cancer patients. The assessment protocol comprised three validated instruments: the Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire-G28 for emotional conflict evaluation, the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire for cognitive assessment, and the Family Resilience Assessment Scale for family dynamics measurement. Latent profile analysis was conducted to characterize distinct emotional expression conflict subtypes, with subsequent multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct emotional expression conflict profiles emerged: (a) Low conflict-emotion expression (33.6%): Proactive emotional sharing with minimal ambivalence. (b) Medium conflict-emotion expression (42.4%): Context-dependent disclosure with moderate ambivalence. (c) High conflict-expression blocked (23.9%): Suppression-dominated behavior with severe ambivalence. Younger age, lower education, reduced income, poor sleep quality, and higher cognitive fusion significantly increased the likelihood of high emotional conflict. Conversely, stronger family resilience was associated with reduced conflict risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the clinical significance of heterogeneity in emotional expression conflicts among breast cancer patients. By targeting modifiable factors (such as sleep quality, cognitive fusion), oncology nursing may advance personalized psychosocial support to address these conflicts. Such strategies demonstrate global applicability for effectively alleviating patient distress and enhancing patient-centered care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9479,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Management and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"1259-1269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latent Profile Analysis of Emotional Expression Conflicts and Associated Influencing Factors in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postoperative Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoxia Tian, Ruishan Sheng, Yutong Zhang, Hongmei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CMAR.S509857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emotional expression conflicts, characterized by approach-avoidance dilemmas in self-disclosure, are prevalent among breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. This study identifies emotional expression conflict subtypes and their predictors to inform targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study employed convenience sampling to recruit 238 postoperative breast cancer patients. The assessment protocol comprised three validated instruments: the Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire-G28 for emotional conflict evaluation, the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire for cognitive assessment, and the Family Resilience Assessment Scale for family dynamics measurement. Latent profile analysis was conducted to characterize distinct emotional expression conflict subtypes, with subsequent multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct emotional expression conflict profiles emerged: (a) Low conflict-emotion expression (33.6%): Proactive emotional sharing with minimal ambivalence. (b) Medium conflict-emotion expression (42.4%): Context-dependent disclosure with moderate ambivalence. (c) High conflict-expression blocked (23.9%): Suppression-dominated behavior with severe ambivalence. Younger age, lower education, reduced income, poor sleep quality, and higher cognitive fusion significantly increased the likelihood of high emotional conflict. Conversely, stronger family resilience was associated with reduced conflict risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the clinical significance of heterogeneity in emotional expression conflicts among breast cancer patients. By targeting modifiable factors (such as sleep quality, cognitive fusion), oncology nursing may advance personalized psychosocial support to address these conflicts. Such strategies demonstrate global applicability for effectively alleviating patient distress and enhancing patient-centered care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1259-1269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Management and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S509857\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Management and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S509857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:情绪表达冲突在乳腺癌术后化疗患者中普遍存在,表现为自我表露中的逃避困境。本研究确定了情绪表达冲突亚型及其预测因子,为有针对性的干预提供信息。方法:采用方便抽样方法,对238例乳腺癌术后患者进行横断面研究。评估方案包括三种有效工具:用于情绪冲突评估的矛盾情绪量表(g28)、用于认知评估的认知融合问卷(g28)和用于家庭动态测量的家庭弹性评估量表(g28)。进行潜在剖面分析以表征不同的情绪表达冲突亚型,随后进行多变量逻辑回归建模以确定显著的预测因子。结果:出现了三种不同的情绪表达冲突特征:(a)低冲突情绪表达(33.6%):具有最小矛盾心理的主动情绪分享。(b)中度冲突情绪表达(42.4%):情境依赖披露伴中度矛盾心理。(c)冲突表达高度受阻(23.9%):压抑主导行为伴严重矛盾心理。年龄较小、受教育程度较低、收入减少、睡眠质量差和认知融合程度较高显著增加了高情绪冲突的可能性。相反,更强的家庭弹性与更低的冲突风险相关。结论:本研究突出了乳腺癌患者情绪表达冲突异质性的临床意义。通过针对可改变的因素(如睡眠质量,认知融合),肿瘤护理可以推进个性化的社会心理支持来解决这些冲突。这样的策略证明全球适用性,有效减轻病人的痛苦和提高以病人为中心的护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Latent Profile Analysis of Emotional Expression Conflicts and Associated Influencing Factors in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postoperative Chemotherapy.

Latent Profile Analysis of Emotional Expression Conflicts and Associated Influencing Factors in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Postoperative Chemotherapy.

Purpose: Emotional expression conflicts, characterized by approach-avoidance dilemmas in self-disclosure, are prevalent among breast cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy. This study identifies emotional expression conflict subtypes and their predictors to inform targeted interventions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study employed convenience sampling to recruit 238 postoperative breast cancer patients. The assessment protocol comprised three validated instruments: the Ambivalence over Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire-G28 for emotional conflict evaluation, the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire for cognitive assessment, and the Family Resilience Assessment Scale for family dynamics measurement. Latent profile analysis was conducted to characterize distinct emotional expression conflict subtypes, with subsequent multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify significant predictors.

Results: Three distinct emotional expression conflict profiles emerged: (a) Low conflict-emotion expression (33.6%): Proactive emotional sharing with minimal ambivalence. (b) Medium conflict-emotion expression (42.4%): Context-dependent disclosure with moderate ambivalence. (c) High conflict-expression blocked (23.9%): Suppression-dominated behavior with severe ambivalence. Younger age, lower education, reduced income, poor sleep quality, and higher cognitive fusion significantly increased the likelihood of high emotional conflict. Conversely, stronger family resilience was associated with reduced conflict risk.

Conclusion: This study highlights the clinical significance of heterogeneity in emotional expression conflicts among breast cancer patients. By targeting modifiable factors (such as sleep quality, cognitive fusion), oncology nursing may advance personalized psychosocial support to address these conflicts. Such strategies demonstrate global applicability for effectively alleviating patient distress and enhancing patient-centered care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Management and Research
Cancer Management and Research Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
448
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival, and quality of life for cancer patients. Specific topics covered in the journal include: ◦Epidemiology, detection and screening ◦Cellular research and biomarkers ◦Identification of biotargets and agents with novel mechanisms of action ◦Optimal clinical use of existing anticancer agents, including combination therapies ◦Radiation and surgery ◦Palliative care ◦Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science, clinical & epidemiological studies, reviews & evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and case series that shed novel insights on a disease or disease subtype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信