让我们谈谈声音:一项支持精神卫生工作者支持声音听者的资源的随机对照交叉研究。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock
{"title":"让我们谈谈声音:一项支持精神卫生工作者支持声音听者的资源的随机对照交叉研究。","authors":"Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (<i>F</i> = 40.2, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (<i>F</i> = 22.9, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 4","pages":"e139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's Talk About Voices: randomised controlled crossover study of a resource to support mental health workers in supporting voice-hearers.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Honey, Justin Newton Scanlan, Lyndal Sherwin, Haylee Zink, Karen Wells, Glenda Jessup, Nicola Hancock\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (<i>F</i> = 40.2, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (<i>F</i> = 22.9, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要容易获得的、有影响力的、以证据为基础的资源,以帮助精神卫生工作者最好地支持声音听者管理声音并与之良好相处。“让我们谈谈声音”(LTAV)是一套创新的资源,专为精神卫生工作者设计,用于支持声音听众。目的:本研究旨在评估LTAV对心理健康工作者自我报告的与听声者合作能力的影响。方法:采用随机对照交叉设计,在三个时间点进行评估。这项评估方法是由研究人员、临床医生、同行工作者和声音听众根据LTAV的目标和计划行为理论共同开发的。参与者被随机分为两组。在第一次评估后,最直接的群体获得了进入LTAV的机会;延迟组在第二次评估后获得访问权。共有256名精神卫生工作者开始了这项研究,其中120人完成了所有评估。结果:组间比较第1次和第2次的变化发现差异显著且效应量较大(F = 40.2, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.19)。意向治疗分析仍具有显著性(F = 22.9, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.08)。两两重复测量比较发现,在获得LTAV后,两组的得分均显著增加,并在随访中持续。24个单项中有14个有显著变化。这些变化在不同的职业、工作环境和与听声者共事的经历中都是一致的,但那些对与听声者共事缺乏信心的人表现出明显更强的改善。结论:本研究表明,LTAV有可能显著改善心理卫生工作者支持听话者的态度和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let's Talk About Voices: randomised controlled crossover study of a resource to support mental health workers in supporting voice-hearers.

Background: Easily accessible, impactful, evidence-based resources are needed to assist mental health workers to best support voice-hearers in managing and living well with voices. Let's Talk About Voices (LTAV) is an innovative suite of resources designed for mental health workers to use in supporting voice-hearers.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of LTAV on mental health workers' self-reported capacity to work with voice-hearers.

Method: A randomised, controlled crossover design was used, with assessment at three time points. The assessment measure was co-developed by researchers, clinicians, peer workers and voice-hearers based on the aims of LTAV and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Participants were randomised into two groups. The immediate group received access to LTAV following the first assessment; the delayed group received access following the second assessment. In total, 256 mental health workers commenced the study, with 120 completing all assessments.

Results: Between-group comparisons for change between times 1 and 2 found a significant difference with a large effect size (F = 40.2, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.19). Significance remained on intention-to-treat analysis (F = 22.9, P < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.08). Pairwise repeated-measures comparisons found a significant increase in scores for both groups following access to LTAV, which was sustained at follow-up. Fourteen of 24 individual items showed significant change. Changes were consistent across professions, work settings and experience working with voice-hearers, but those with less confidence in working with voice-hearers on intake showed significantly stronger improvements.

Conclusions: This research indicates that LTAV has the potential to substantially improve mental health workers' attitudes and confidence in supporting voice-hearers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信