重度抑郁发作期间积极情绪、快感缺乏和生活意义的双向关联:单极和双相个体及健康对照的生态瞬时评估研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Heidi Ka Ying Lo, Roger S McIntyre, Iris Wai Tung Tsui, Fiona Yan Yee Ho, Ting Kin Ng, Corine Sau Man Wong, Suet Ying Yuen, Chit Tat Lee, Chun Yin Poon, Inez Myin-Germeys, Ka Fai Chung
{"title":"重度抑郁发作期间积极情绪、快感缺乏和生活意义的双向关联:单极和双相个体及健康对照的生态瞬时评估研究","authors":"Heidi Ka Ying Lo, Roger S McIntyre, Iris Wai Tung Tsui, Fiona Yan Yee Ho, Ting Kin Ng, Corine Sau Man Wong, Suet Ying Yuen, Chit Tat Lee, Chun Yin Poon, Inez Myin-Germeys, Ka Fai Chung","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy is an unmet need for major depressive disorder (MDD) and major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar disorder. Very limited research has evaluated bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) time-series data.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to examine differentiating phenomenological characteristics in positive affect dynamics, and temporal relationships with pleasure towards current activity and meaning in life (MIL), among MDD, MDE/bipolar disorder and healthy controls using EMA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 88, mean age 28.7 years, 69% female), including individuals with MDD (<i>n</i> = 29) and MDE/bipolar disorder (<i>n</i> = 29) and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 30), were assessed for positive affect, pleasure and MIL 5 times daily over a 2-week period. Multilevel modelling analysis was conducted, with estimation of first-order autoregressive model structure and time-lagged relationship between pleasure and positive affect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 4632 EMA observations, positive affect dynamics (inertia, variability and instability) did not differ significantly across groups (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Although all groups demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between positive affect and pleasure, for MDE/bipolar disorder, both pleasure<sub><i>t</i> - 1</sub> (<i>β</i> = -0.11, <i>t</i>[51.09] = -2.31, <i>P</i> = 0.025) and positive affect<sub><i>t</i> - 1</sub> (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>t</i>[56.54] = -2.30, <i>P</i> = 0.025) predicted subsequent MIL less significantly than for MDD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with MDE/bipolar disorder, but not MDD, had less self-reported MIL from positive affect and pleasure. There is little evidence that emotional experience alone characterises the pathophysiology between MDD and MDE/bipolar disorder; such investigation may be limited by within-group heterogeneity. Our findings provide a new perspective on using a time-series approach beyond bimodal measures in EMA to differentiate bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 4","pages":"e141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bidirectional associations among positive affect, anhedonia and meaning in life during major depressive episode: ecological momentary assessment study in unipolar and bipolar individuals and healthy controls.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Ka Ying Lo, Roger S McIntyre, Iris Wai Tung Tsui, Fiona Yan Yee Ho, Ting Kin Ng, Corine Sau Man Wong, Suet Ying Yuen, Chit Tat Lee, Chun Yin Poon, Inez Myin-Germeys, Ka Fai Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy is an unmet need for major depressive disorder (MDD) and major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar disorder. Very limited research has evaluated bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) time-series data.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to examine differentiating phenomenological characteristics in positive affect dynamics, and temporal relationships with pleasure towards current activity and meaning in life (MIL), among MDD, MDE/bipolar disorder and healthy controls using EMA.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 88, mean age 28.7 years, 69% female), including individuals with MDD (<i>n</i> = 29) and MDE/bipolar disorder (<i>n</i> = 29) and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 30), were assessed for positive affect, pleasure and MIL 5 times daily over a 2-week period. Multilevel modelling analysis was conducted, with estimation of first-order autoregressive model structure and time-lagged relationship between pleasure and positive affect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 4632 EMA observations, positive affect dynamics (inertia, variability and instability) did not differ significantly across groups (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). Although all groups demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between positive affect and pleasure, for MDE/bipolar disorder, both pleasure<sub><i>t</i> - 1</sub> (<i>β</i> = -0.11, <i>t</i>[51.09] = -2.31, <i>P</i> = 0.025) and positive affect<sub><i>t</i> - 1</sub> (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>t</i>[56.54] = -2.30, <i>P</i> = 0.025) predicted subsequent MIL less significantly than for MDD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with MDE/bipolar disorder, but not MDD, had less self-reported MIL from positive affect and pleasure. There is little evidence that emotional experience alone characterises the pathophysiology between MDD and MDE/bipolar disorder; such investigation may be limited by within-group heterogeneity. Our findings provide a new perspective on using a time-series approach beyond bimodal measures in EMA to differentiate bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:诊断准确性是双相情感障碍中重度抑郁障碍(MDD)和重度抑郁发作(MDE)的未满足需求。使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)时间序列数据评估双相情感障碍/MDE和MDD的研究非常有限。目的:我们旨在研究MDD、MDE/双相情感障碍和使用EMA的健康对照中,积极情感动力学的不同现象学特征,以及对当前活动和生活意义(MIL)的愉悦感的时间关系。方法:参与者(N = 88,平均年龄28.7岁,69%为女性),包括重度抑郁症(N = 29)和重度抑郁症/双相情感障碍(N = 29)以及健康对照(N = 30),在2周的时间内每天5次评估积极情绪、愉悦感和MIL。进行多层次模型分析,估计一阶自回归模型结构和愉悦与积极情绪之间的时滞关系。结果:从4632个EMA观察结果来看,积极情绪动态(惯性、变异性和不稳定性)在各组之间没有显著差异(均P < 0.05)。虽然所有组均表现出积极情感与快乐之间的双向关系,但对于MDE/双相情感障碍,快乐- 1 (β = -0.11, t[51.09] = -2.31, P = 0.025)和积极情感- 1 (β = -0.13, t[56.54] = -2.30, P = 0.025)对随后的MIL的预测均低于MDD和健康对照组。结论:MDE/双相情感障碍患者,而非MDD患者,自我报告的积极情绪和愉悦的MIL较少。很少有证据表明情绪体验本身是重度抑郁症和重度抑郁症/双相情感障碍之间的病理生理特征;这种调查可能受到组内异质性的限制。我们的研究结果为在EMA中使用时间序列方法来区分双相情感障碍/MDE和MDD提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bidirectional associations among positive affect, anhedonia and meaning in life during major depressive episode: ecological momentary assessment study in unipolar and bipolar individuals and healthy controls.

Background: Diagnostic accuracy is an unmet need for major depressive disorder (MDD) and major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar disorder. Very limited research has evaluated bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) time-series data.

Aims: We aimed to examine differentiating phenomenological characteristics in positive affect dynamics, and temporal relationships with pleasure towards current activity and meaning in life (MIL), among MDD, MDE/bipolar disorder and healthy controls using EMA.

Method: Participants (N = 88, mean age 28.7 years, 69% female), including individuals with MDD (n = 29) and MDE/bipolar disorder (n = 29) and healthy controls (n = 30), were assessed for positive affect, pleasure and MIL 5 times daily over a 2-week period. Multilevel modelling analysis was conducted, with estimation of first-order autoregressive model structure and time-lagged relationship between pleasure and positive affect.

Results: From 4632 EMA observations, positive affect dynamics (inertia, variability and instability) did not differ significantly across groups (all P > 0.05). Although all groups demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between positive affect and pleasure, for MDE/bipolar disorder, both pleasuret - 1 (β = -0.11, t[51.09] = -2.31, P = 0.025) and positive affectt - 1 (β = -0.13, t[56.54] = -2.30, P = 0.025) predicted subsequent MIL less significantly than for MDD and healthy controls.

Conclusion: Individuals with MDE/bipolar disorder, but not MDD, had less self-reported MIL from positive affect and pleasure. There is little evidence that emotional experience alone characterises the pathophysiology between MDD and MDE/bipolar disorder; such investigation may be limited by within-group heterogeneity. Our findings provide a new perspective on using a time-series approach beyond bimodal measures in EMA to differentiate bipolar disorder/MDE and MDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信