Medha Barbhaiya, Stephane Zuily, Deanna Jannat-Khah, Mary-Carmen Amigo, Danieli Andrade, Tadej Avcin, Maria L Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Guilherme Ramires de Jesús, Katrien M J Devreese, David Garcia, Jose A Gomez Puerta, Francis Guillemin, Steven R Levine, Roger A Levy, Michael D Lockshin, Thomas L Ortel, Michelle Petri, Giovanni Sanna, Savino Sciascia, Surya V Seshan, Maria Tektonidou, Denis Wahl, Rohan Willis, Cecile Yelnik, Alison Hendry, Ray Naden, Karen H Costenbader, Doruk Erkan
{"title":"2023年ACR/EULAR抗磷脂综合征分类标准的制定,III-C期报告:患者情景评估(衍生队列)和定义的改进。","authors":"Medha Barbhaiya, Stephane Zuily, Deanna Jannat-Khah, Mary-Carmen Amigo, Danieli Andrade, Tadej Avcin, Maria L Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Guilherme Ramires de Jesús, Katrien M J Devreese, David Garcia, Jose A Gomez Puerta, Francis Guillemin, Steven R Levine, Roger A Levy, Michael D Lockshin, Thomas L Ortel, Michelle Petri, Giovanni Sanna, Savino Sciascia, Surya V Seshan, Maria Tektonidou, Denis Wahl, Rohan Willis, Cecile Yelnik, Alison Hendry, Ray Naden, Karen H Costenbader, Doruk Erkan","doi":"10.1002/acr.25599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Classification criteria aim to identify patients with high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodological approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize Phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive cases referred for \"suspected APS\". Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert Scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with \"highly likely\" versus \"equivocal or unlikely\" APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely, 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboses (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95%CI 2.11-8.78] to RR 1.56 [95%CI 0.89-2.75] for VTE, and RR 3.48 [95%CI 1.91-6.32] to RR 1.64 [95%CI 0.77-3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody >40U, and anti-β<sub>2</sub>-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody >40U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all p<0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. Risk ratio analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-C Report: Assessment of Patient Scenarios (Derivation Cohort) and Refinement of Definitions.\",\"authors\":\"Medha Barbhaiya, Stephane Zuily, Deanna Jannat-Khah, Mary-Carmen Amigo, Danieli Andrade, Tadej Avcin, Maria L Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Guilherme Ramires de Jesús, Katrien M J Devreese, David Garcia, Jose A Gomez Puerta, Francis Guillemin, Steven R Levine, Roger A Levy, Michael D Lockshin, Thomas L Ortel, Michelle Petri, Giovanni Sanna, Savino Sciascia, Surya V Seshan, Maria Tektonidou, Denis Wahl, Rohan Willis, Cecile Yelnik, Alison Hendry, Ray Naden, Karen H Costenbader, Doruk Erkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Classification criteria aim to identify patients with high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodological approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize Phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive cases referred for \\\"suspected APS\\\". Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert Scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with \\\"highly likely\\\" versus \\\"equivocal or unlikely\\\" APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely, 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboses (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95%CI 2.11-8.78] to RR 1.56 [95%CI 0.89-2.75] for VTE, and RR 3.48 [95%CI 1.91-6.32] to RR 1.64 [95%CI 0.77-3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody >40U, and anti-β<sub>2</sub>-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody >40U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all p<0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. Risk ratio analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria, Phase III-C Report: Assessment of Patient Scenarios (Derivation Cohort) and Refinement of Definitions.
Objective: The 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Classification criteria aim to identify patients with high likelihood of APS for research. Phases I/II of our four-phase methodological approach resulted in 27 candidate criteria organized in clinical and laboratory domains. Here, we summarize Phase III efforts to reduce and refine criteria using patient scenarios.
Methods: Using standardized definitions for candidate criteria, the Steering Committee collected antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive cases referred for "suspected APS". Treating physicians assessed APS case likelihood using a Likert Scale. Poisson regression calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals to quantify the direction and size of the association of candidate criteria with "highly likely" versus "equivocal or unlikely" APS, which guided Steering Committee candidate criteria refinement and organization.
Results: We collected 314 suspected APS cases (137 [44%] highly likely, 177 [56%] equivocal/unlikely APS). Provoking venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboses (AT) risk factors reduced the size of the association with highly likely APS (RR 4.31 [95%CI 2.11-8.78] to RR 1.56 [95%CI 0.89-2.75] for VTE, and RR 3.48 [95%CI 1.91-6.32] to RR 1.64 [95%CI 0.77-3.51] for AT). Persistent lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG antibody >40U, and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgG antibody >40U were positively associated with highly likely APS (all p<0.05). Eventually, items within eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains were refined.
Conclusion: Referred suspected APS cases provided insight into associations of individual candidate criteria with APS likelihood. Risk ratio analyses helped refine items and organize the draft classification system into eight additive and independent clinical and laboratory domains.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.