国际比较视角下的英国生产力“困惑”

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
John Fernald, Robert Inklaar
{"title":"国际比较视角下的英国生产力“困惑”","authors":"John Fernald,&nbsp;Robert Inklaar","doi":"10.1111/obes.12660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The UK's slow productivity growth since 2007 has been referred to as a “puzzle,” as if it were a particularly UK-specific problem. We highlight how the United States and northern Europe experienced very similar slowdowns. In all three regions, the slowdown in total factor productivity (TFP) growth accounts for the slowdown in labor productivity growth. We find no evidence in capital-output ratios, investment rates, or internal rates of return that something substantive changed in the capital-formation process after 2007—other than a slowdown in TFP and output growth that induced slower capital formation. Hence, capital formation is not an important independent factor in the post-2007 productivity slowdown. For the UK, weak investment is a longstanding concern going back to the 1990s, though considerations of non-national accounts intangible assets somewhat ameliorate the investment shortfalls. The common slowdown in TFP growth is fairly broad-based across industry groups. Industry-specific issues, such as in mining, account for some of relative ground lost after 2007 rather than indicating a systematic UK competitiveness problem.</p>","PeriodicalId":54654,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","volume":"87 4","pages":"691-710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obes.12660","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The UK Productivity “Puzzle” in an International Comparative Perspective\",\"authors\":\"John Fernald,&nbsp;Robert Inklaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obes.12660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The UK's slow productivity growth since 2007 has been referred to as a “puzzle,” as if it were a particularly UK-specific problem. We highlight how the United States and northern Europe experienced very similar slowdowns. In all three regions, the slowdown in total factor productivity (TFP) growth accounts for the slowdown in labor productivity growth. We find no evidence in capital-output ratios, investment rates, or internal rates of return that something substantive changed in the capital-formation process after 2007—other than a slowdown in TFP and output growth that induced slower capital formation. Hence, capital formation is not an important independent factor in the post-2007 productivity slowdown. For the UK, weak investment is a longstanding concern going back to the 1990s, though considerations of non-national accounts intangible assets somewhat ameliorate the investment shortfalls. The common slowdown in TFP growth is fairly broad-based across industry groups. Industry-specific issues, such as in mining, account for some of relative ground lost after 2007 rather than indicating a systematic UK competitiveness problem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"691-710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obes.12660\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obes.12660\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obes.12660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2007年以来,英国的生产率增长缓慢一直被称为一个“谜”,仿佛这是一个英国特有的问题。我们强调美国和北欧经历了非常相似的经济放缓。在这三个地区,全要素生产率(TFP)增长放缓是劳动生产率增长放缓的原因。在资本产出率、投资率或内部回报率方面,我们没有发现证据表明2007年后资本形成过程发生了实质性变化——除了TFP和产出增长放缓导致资本形成放缓之外。因此,资本形成并不是2007年后生产率放缓的一个重要独立因素。对英国来说,投资疲软是一个可以追溯到上世纪90年代的长期问题,尽管考虑到非国民账户无形资产,在一定程度上缓解了投资不足的问题。全要素生产率增长的普遍放缓在各个行业群体中都相当普遍。行业特有的问题(如采矿业)是2007年之后相对失地的部分原因,而不是表明英国存在系统性的竞争力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The UK Productivity “Puzzle” in an International Comparative Perspective

The UK Productivity “Puzzle” in an International Comparative Perspective

The UK's slow productivity growth since 2007 has been referred to as a “puzzle,” as if it were a particularly UK-specific problem. We highlight how the United States and northern Europe experienced very similar slowdowns. In all three regions, the slowdown in total factor productivity (TFP) growth accounts for the slowdown in labor productivity growth. We find no evidence in capital-output ratios, investment rates, or internal rates of return that something substantive changed in the capital-formation process after 2007—other than a slowdown in TFP and output growth that induced slower capital formation. Hence, capital formation is not an important independent factor in the post-2007 productivity slowdown. For the UK, weak investment is a longstanding concern going back to the 1990s, though considerations of non-national accounts intangible assets somewhat ameliorate the investment shortfalls. The common slowdown in TFP growth is fairly broad-based across industry groups. Industry-specific issues, such as in mining, account for some of relative ground lost after 2007 rather than indicating a systematic UK competitiveness problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 管理科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Whilst the Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics publishes papers in all areas of applied economics, emphasis is placed on the practical importance, theoretical interest and policy-relevance of their substantive results, as well as on the methodology and technical competence of the research. Contributions on the topical issues of economic policy and the testing of currently controversial economic theories are encouraged, as well as more empirical research on both developed and developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信