从政策到盘子:畜禽监管对中国农村肉类消费的影响

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Zhen Yan, Hao Feng, Ziwei Li, Wen Lin
{"title":"从政策到盘子:畜禽监管对中国农村肉类消费的影响","authors":"Zhen Yan,&nbsp;Hao Feng,&nbsp;Ziwei Li,&nbsp;Wen Lin","doi":"10.1111/agec.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Given the negative externalities generated by pollution from livestock and poultry production, governments have implemented environmental regulations targeting the agricultural sector. This study uses China's livestock and poultry regulation (LPR) as a quasiexperiment and evaluates its impacts on rural residents’ meat consumption. Utilizing the data from China Health and Nutrition Surveys, our findings reveal an average reduction of 15.1 g in daily meat consumption per rural resident, primarily attributed to meat price increases. However, nonfarm employment would alleviate the negative impact of LPR on meat consumption. Residents with higher income, engaging in nonfarm jobs, and higher dietary knowledge exhibit lower mean intake reduction. Furthermore, for individuals with excessive meat intake, the regulation reduces their meat consumption, while exerting little effects on those with inadequate or moderate meat consumption. Our findings have important policy implications regarding the trade-offs between food security and nutrition and environmental protection, in particular in rural areas.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"56 4","pages":"574-586"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Policy to Plate: The Impact of Livestock and Poultry Regulation on Meat Consumption in Rural China\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Yan,&nbsp;Hao Feng,&nbsp;Ziwei Li,&nbsp;Wen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/agec.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Given the negative externalities generated by pollution from livestock and poultry production, governments have implemented environmental regulations targeting the agricultural sector. This study uses China's livestock and poultry regulation (LPR) as a quasiexperiment and evaluates its impacts on rural residents’ meat consumption. Utilizing the data from China Health and Nutrition Surveys, our findings reveal an average reduction of 15.1 g in daily meat consumption per rural resident, primarily attributed to meat price increases. However, nonfarm employment would alleviate the negative impact of LPR on meat consumption. Residents with higher income, engaging in nonfarm jobs, and higher dietary knowledge exhibit lower mean intake reduction. Furthermore, for individuals with excessive meat intake, the regulation reduces their meat consumption, while exerting little effects on those with inadequate or moderate meat consumption. Our findings have important policy implications regarding the trade-offs between food security and nutrition and environmental protection, in particular in rural areas.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"574-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于牲畜和家禽生产污染所产生的负面外部性,各国政府已针对农业部门实施了环境法规。本研究以中国畜禽监管(LPR)为准实验,评估其对农村居民肉类消费的影响。利用中国健康与营养调查的数据,我们的研究结果显示,由于肉类价格上涨,农村居民人均每日肉类消费量平均减少了15.1克。然而,非农就业将缓解LPR对肉类消费的负面影响。收入较高、从事非农工作和饮食知识水平较高的居民平均摄入量减少幅度较小。此外,对于肉类摄入过量的个人,该规定减少了他们的肉类消费,而对肉类消费不足或适度的人影响不大。我们的研究结果对粮食安全、营养和环境保护之间的权衡具有重要的政策意义,特别是在农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Policy to Plate: The Impact of Livestock and Poultry Regulation on Meat Consumption in Rural China

Given the negative externalities generated by pollution from livestock and poultry production, governments have implemented environmental regulations targeting the agricultural sector. This study uses China's livestock and poultry regulation (LPR) as a quasiexperiment and evaluates its impacts on rural residents’ meat consumption. Utilizing the data from China Health and Nutrition Surveys, our findings reveal an average reduction of 15.1 g in daily meat consumption per rural resident, primarily attributed to meat price increases. However, nonfarm employment would alleviate the negative impact of LPR on meat consumption. Residents with higher income, engaging in nonfarm jobs, and higher dietary knowledge exhibit lower mean intake reduction. Furthermore, for individuals with excessive meat intake, the regulation reduces their meat consumption, while exerting little effects on those with inadequate or moderate meat consumption. Our findings have important policy implications regarding the trade-offs between food security and nutrition and environmental protection, in particular in rural areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信