复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的认知功能

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S. Liesto, T. Aho, S. K. Jääskeläinen, M. Hietanen, E. Kalso
{"title":"复杂局部疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的认知功能","authors":"S. Liesto,&nbsp;T. Aho,&nbsp;S. K. Jääskeläinen,&nbsp;M. Hietanen,&nbsp;E. Kalso","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is characterised by pain, sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor, and trophic symptoms, with cognitive symptoms also reported. This study aimed to examine the neuropsychological profile of patients with meticulously diagnosed CRPS 1 and 2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A neuropsychological examination was conducted in 54 CRPS patients. The test battery included Block Design and Similarities from Wechsler Adult Intelligence-IV, word list learning and delayed recall, and Digit Span from Wechsler Memory Scale-III, Trail Making Test (TMT), verbal and drawing fluency, Brixton, Manikin and Bourdon–Wiersma tests. Patients performing below −0.67 SD of the performance of a healthy Finnish population in ≥ 3 tests were classified as having cognitive decline. Questionnaires included Insomnia Severity Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, CRPS Severity Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Resilience Scale-14, Brief Pain Inventory, Insomnia Severity Index and State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Patients were asked about subjective cognitive difficulties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A subgroup comprising 30% of the CRPS patients showed cognitive decline. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with poorer test performance in TMT Part A. There were no differences between left and right sides on the visual attention test. Subjective cognitive difficulties were not associated with objective cognitive test performance. Cognitive functioning did not differ between CRPS 1 and 2 patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study elucidates how CRPS affects cognitive functioning, important information when tailoring multidisciplinary rehabilitation to CRPS patients. Psychological factors may have a stronger impact on subjective cognitive difficulties than on objective test performances.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>CRPS is an enigmatic syndrome with multifactorial origins, leading to chronic, disabling pain due to progressing neuroplastic alterations in the central nervous system. This study adds comprehensive novel information about cognitive function in CRPS, as, except for lateralised cognitions and body perception, cognitive domains have not previously been extensively studied in CRPS patients. Cognitive decline in 30% of patients indicates that neuropsychological assessment should be included in the diagnostics, and results considered in the rehabilitation of CRPS patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04439669</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)\",\"authors\":\"S. Liesto,&nbsp;T. Aho,&nbsp;S. K. Jääskeläinen,&nbsp;M. Hietanen,&nbsp;E. Kalso\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.70070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is characterised by pain, sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor, and trophic symptoms, with cognitive symptoms also reported. This study aimed to examine the neuropsychological profile of patients with meticulously diagnosed CRPS 1 and 2.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A neuropsychological examination was conducted in 54 CRPS patients. The test battery included Block Design and Similarities from Wechsler Adult Intelligence-IV, word list learning and delayed recall, and Digit Span from Wechsler Memory Scale-III, Trail Making Test (TMT), verbal and drawing fluency, Brixton, Manikin and Bourdon–Wiersma tests. Patients performing below −0.67 SD of the performance of a healthy Finnish population in ≥ 3 tests were classified as having cognitive decline. Questionnaires included Insomnia Severity Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, CRPS Severity Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Resilience Scale-14, Brief Pain Inventory, Insomnia Severity Index and State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Patients were asked about subjective cognitive difficulties.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A subgroup comprising 30% of the CRPS patients showed cognitive decline. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with poorer test performance in TMT Part A. There were no differences between left and right sides on the visual attention test. Subjective cognitive difficulties were not associated with objective cognitive test performance. Cognitive functioning did not differ between CRPS 1 and 2 patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study elucidates how CRPS affects cognitive functioning, important information when tailoring multidisciplinary rehabilitation to CRPS patients. Psychological factors may have a stronger impact on subjective cognitive difficulties than on objective test performances.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\\n \\n <p>CRPS is an enigmatic syndrome with multifactorial origins, leading to chronic, disabling pain due to progressing neuroplastic alterations in the central nervous system. This study adds comprehensive novel information about cognitive function in CRPS, as, except for lateralised cognitions and body perception, cognitive domains have not previously been extensively studied in CRPS patients. Cognitive decline in 30% of patients indicates that neuropsychological assessment should be included in the diagnostics, and results considered in the rehabilitation of CRPS patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04439669</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复杂区域性疼痛综合征(CRPS)的特征是疼痛、感觉、血管舒缩、支配性运动、运动和营养症状,也有认知症状的报道。本研究旨在检查精心诊断为CRPS 1和2的患者的神经心理学特征。方法对54例CRPS患者进行神经心理检查。测试单元包括韦氏成人智力- iv的块设计和相似度,单词列表学习和延迟回忆,韦氏记忆量表- iii的数字广度,线索制作测试(TMT),言语和绘画流畅性,Brixton, Manikin和Bourdon-Wiersma测试。在≥3项测试中表现低于芬兰健康人群- 0.67 SD的患者被归类为认知能力下降。问卷包括失眠严重程度指数、Beck抑郁量表- ii、CRPS严重程度量表、手臂、肩膀和手的残疾、疼痛灾难量表、恢复力量表-14、短暂疼痛量表、失眠严重程度指数和状态特质焦虑量表。患者被问及主观认知困难。结果30%的CRPS患者出现认知能力下降。疼痛灾难化程度越高,TMT Part a的测试成绩越差。在视觉注意测试中,左右侧受试者之间没有差异。主观认知困难与客观认知测试成绩无关。认知功能在CRPS 1和2患者之间没有差异。结论本研究阐明了CRPS如何影响认知功能,这是为CRPS患者量身定制多学科康复的重要信息。心理因素对主观认知困难的影响可能比对客观测试成绩的影响更大。CRPS是一种多因素起源的神秘综合征,由于中枢神经系统进展性神经可塑性改变导致慢性致残性疼痛。本研究为CRPS患者的认知功能提供了全面的新信息,因为除了侧化认知和身体感知外,认知领域此前尚未在CRPS患者中得到广泛研究。30%的患者认知能力下降,提示诊断中应纳入神经心理学评估,并将结果纳入CRPS患者的康复治疗中。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT04439669
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Cognitive Function in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Background

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is characterised by pain, sensory, vasomotor, sudomotor, motor, and trophic symptoms, with cognitive symptoms also reported. This study aimed to examine the neuropsychological profile of patients with meticulously diagnosed CRPS 1 and 2.

Methods

A neuropsychological examination was conducted in 54 CRPS patients. The test battery included Block Design and Similarities from Wechsler Adult Intelligence-IV, word list learning and delayed recall, and Digit Span from Wechsler Memory Scale-III, Trail Making Test (TMT), verbal and drawing fluency, Brixton, Manikin and Bourdon–Wiersma tests. Patients performing below −0.67 SD of the performance of a healthy Finnish population in ≥ 3 tests were classified as having cognitive decline. Questionnaires included Insomnia Severity Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, CRPS Severity Scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Resilience Scale-14, Brief Pain Inventory, Insomnia Severity Index and State Trait Anxiety Inventory. Patients were asked about subjective cognitive difficulties.

Results

A subgroup comprising 30% of the CRPS patients showed cognitive decline. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with poorer test performance in TMT Part A. There were no differences between left and right sides on the visual attention test. Subjective cognitive difficulties were not associated with objective cognitive test performance. Cognitive functioning did not differ between CRPS 1 and 2 patients.

Conclusions

This study elucidates how CRPS affects cognitive functioning, important information when tailoring multidisciplinary rehabilitation to CRPS patients. Psychological factors may have a stronger impact on subjective cognitive difficulties than on objective test performances.

Significance Statement

CRPS is an enigmatic syndrome with multifactorial origins, leading to chronic, disabling pain due to progressing neuroplastic alterations in the central nervous system. This study adds comprehensive novel information about cognitive function in CRPS, as, except for lateralised cognitions and body perception, cognitive domains have not previously been extensively studied in CRPS patients. Cognitive decline in 30% of patients indicates that neuropsychological assessment should be included in the diagnostics, and results considered in the rehabilitation of CRPS patients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04439669

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信