Xiaodan Xu, Sandra Gołębiowska, Teresa de los Arcos, Guido Grundmeier and Adrian Keller
{"title":"DNA折纸吸附在单晶TiO2表面†","authors":"Xiaodan Xu, Sandra Gołębiowska, Teresa de los Arcos, Guido Grundmeier and Adrian Keller","doi":"10.1039/D5LF00109A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The immobilization of DNA origami nanostructures on solid surfaces is an important prerequisite for their application in many biosensors. So far, DNA origami immobilization has been investigated in detail only on a few surfaces such as mica, SiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and graphite. TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> is a conductive oxide with extensive applications in photocatalysis, energy conversion, and (bio)sensing. Despite its great importance, however, TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> has not been investigated as a substrate for DNA origami immobilization yet. Here, we systematically investigate the adsorption of 2D DNA origami triangles on single-crystalline TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces under various experimental conditions. Interestingly, the effect of the Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration on DNA origami surface coverage is found to depend on the orientation of the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surface. On TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(110) and TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(111), 10 mM Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> yields a higher surface coverage than 5 mM. However, the inverse is observed for the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(001) surface, where the lower Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration leads to an increase in surface coverage by up to 75%. This is explained by the interplay between Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> binding to the DNA phosphates and Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> adsorption at the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces, which in the case of TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(001) results in a maximum density of Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> salt bridges already at a low Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration. At higher concentrations, both the surface and the DNA phosphates are getting saturated with Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> ions, which introduces electrostatic repulsion at the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–DNA interface and thus lowers the surface coverage. Our results demonstrate that DNA origami surface coverage at different TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces can be controlled by the Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration. However, the same mechanism may also play a role in DNA origami adsorption at other single-crystalline oxide surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":101138,"journal":{"name":"RSC Applied Interfaces","volume":" 4","pages":" 931-939"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/lf/d5lf00109a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DNA origami adsorption at single-crystalline TiO2 surfaces†\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodan Xu, Sandra Gołębiowska, Teresa de los Arcos, Guido Grundmeier and Adrian Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5LF00109A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The immobilization of DNA origami nanostructures on solid surfaces is an important prerequisite for their application in many biosensors. So far, DNA origami immobilization has been investigated in detail only on a few surfaces such as mica, SiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>, and graphite. TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> is a conductive oxide with extensive applications in photocatalysis, energy conversion, and (bio)sensing. Despite its great importance, however, TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> has not been investigated as a substrate for DNA origami immobilization yet. Here, we systematically investigate the adsorption of 2D DNA origami triangles on single-crystalline TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces under various experimental conditions. Interestingly, the effect of the Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration on DNA origami surface coverage is found to depend on the orientation of the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surface. On TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(110) and TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(111), 10 mM Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> yields a higher surface coverage than 5 mM. However, the inverse is observed for the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(001) surface, where the lower Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration leads to an increase in surface coverage by up to 75%. This is explained by the interplay between Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> binding to the DNA phosphates and Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> adsorption at the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces, which in the case of TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>(001) results in a maximum density of Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> salt bridges already at a low Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration. At higher concentrations, both the surface and the DNA phosphates are getting saturated with Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> ions, which introduces electrostatic repulsion at the TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small>–DNA interface and thus lowers the surface coverage. Our results demonstrate that DNA origami surface coverage at different TiO<small><sub>2</sub></small> surfaces can be controlled by the Mg<small><sup>2+</sup></small> concentration. However, the same mechanism may also play a role in DNA origami adsorption at other single-crystalline oxide surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSC Applied Interfaces\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 931-939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/lf/d5lf00109a?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSC Applied Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/lf/d5lf00109a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Applied Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/lf/d5lf00109a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
将DNA折纸纳米结构固定在固体表面是其应用于许多生物传感器的重要前提。到目前为止,DNA折纸固定只在云母、二氧化硅和石墨等几种表面上进行了详细的研究。TiO2是一种导电氧化物,在光催化、能量转换和(生物)传感等方面有着广泛的应用。然而,尽管TiO2具有重要的意义,但尚未研究过TiO2作为DNA折纸固定的底物。在这里,我们系统地研究了二维DNA折纸三角形在不同实验条件下在单晶TiO2表面的吸附。有趣的是,Mg2+浓度对DNA折纸表面覆盖率的影响与TiO2表面的取向有关。在TiO2(110)和TiO2(111)上,10 mM Mg2+的表面覆盖率高于5 mM。然而,在TiO2(001)表面上观察到相反的情况,其中较低的Mg2+浓度导致表面覆盖率增加高达75%。这可以通过Mg2+与DNA磷酸盐的结合和Mg2+在TiO2表面的吸附之间的相互作用来解释,在TiO2(001)的情况下,Mg2+盐桥的最大密度已经在低Mg2+浓度下。在较高浓度下,表面和DNA磷酸盐都被Mg2+离子饱和,这会在TiO2-DNA界面上引入静电斥力,从而降低表面覆盖率。我们的研究结果表明,DNA折纸表面覆盖在不同的TiO2表面可以由Mg2+浓度控制。然而,同样的机制也可能在其他单晶氧化物表面的DNA折纸吸附中起作用。
DNA origami adsorption at single-crystalline TiO2 surfaces†
The immobilization of DNA origami nanostructures on solid surfaces is an important prerequisite for their application in many biosensors. So far, DNA origami immobilization has been investigated in detail only on a few surfaces such as mica, SiO2, and graphite. TiO2 is a conductive oxide with extensive applications in photocatalysis, energy conversion, and (bio)sensing. Despite its great importance, however, TiO2 has not been investigated as a substrate for DNA origami immobilization yet. Here, we systematically investigate the adsorption of 2D DNA origami triangles on single-crystalline TiO2 surfaces under various experimental conditions. Interestingly, the effect of the Mg2+ concentration on DNA origami surface coverage is found to depend on the orientation of the TiO2 surface. On TiO2(110) and TiO2(111), 10 mM Mg2+ yields a higher surface coverage than 5 mM. However, the inverse is observed for the TiO2(001) surface, where the lower Mg2+ concentration leads to an increase in surface coverage by up to 75%. This is explained by the interplay between Mg2+ binding to the DNA phosphates and Mg2+ adsorption at the TiO2 surfaces, which in the case of TiO2(001) results in a maximum density of Mg2+ salt bridges already at a low Mg2+ concentration. At higher concentrations, both the surface and the DNA phosphates are getting saturated with Mg2+ ions, which introduces electrostatic repulsion at the TiO2–DNA interface and thus lowers the surface coverage. Our results demonstrate that DNA origami surface coverage at different TiO2 surfaces can be controlled by the Mg2+ concentration. However, the same mechanism may also play a role in DNA origami adsorption at other single-crystalline oxide surfaces.