{"title":"翻转技术对侧卧位患者使用便携式髋关节导航系统测量髋臼杯位置精度的影响","authors":"Hiromasa Tanino MD, PhD, Ryo Mitsutake MD, PhD, Hiroshi Ito MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate cup placement is performed for achieving satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative tools for accurate cup placement. Several factors have been reported to affect their accuracy, including the flip technique, in which the pelvic reference plane is registered in the supine position and the patient is subsequently repositioned to the lateral decubitus position for surgery. The effectiveness of the flip technique remains a subject of debate. Therefore, this study assessed and compared the accuracy of cup position measurements using an inertial portable hip navigation system in the lateral decubitus position.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Measurement accuracy was assessed in 78 hips. The accuracy of the system was compared with and without the flip technique, employing an identical method for registering the pelvic reference plane. Cup angles displayed on the system during surgery were compared with those measured postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Measurement errors with and without the flip technique were 3.7° ± 2.8° and 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction (<em>P</em> = .029) and 2.9° ± 2.5° and 3.9° ± 2.9° for cup anteversion (<em>P</em> = .037). The system achieved measurement errors within 10° in 97 and 98% of hips for cup abduction (<em>P</em> = .636), and 99 and 96% of hips for cup anteversion (<em>P</em> = .364) with and without the flip technique.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This system provided reliable intraoperative measurements of cup positions, irrespective of the use of the flip technique. However, cup abduction measurements were more accurate without the flip technique, while cup anteversion measurements were more accurate with the flip technique.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 101769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Flip Technique on Measurement Accuracy of the Acetabular Cup Position Using a Portable Hip Navigation System With Patients in the Lateral Decubitus Position\",\"authors\":\"Hiromasa Tanino MD, PhD, Ryo Mitsutake MD, PhD, Hiroshi Ito MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate cup placement is performed for achieving satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative tools for accurate cup placement. Several factors have been reported to affect their accuracy, including the flip technique, in which the pelvic reference plane is registered in the supine position and the patient is subsequently repositioned to the lateral decubitus position for surgery. The effectiveness of the flip technique remains a subject of debate. Therefore, this study assessed and compared the accuracy of cup position measurements using an inertial portable hip navigation system in the lateral decubitus position.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Measurement accuracy was assessed in 78 hips. The accuracy of the system was compared with and without the flip technique, employing an identical method for registering the pelvic reference plane. Cup angles displayed on the system during surgery were compared with those measured postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Measurement errors with and without the flip technique were 3.7° ± 2.8° and 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction (<em>P</em> = .029) and 2.9° ± 2.5° and 3.9° ± 2.9° for cup anteversion (<em>P</em> = .037). The system achieved measurement errors within 10° in 97 and 98% of hips for cup abduction (<em>P</em> = .636), and 99 and 96% of hips for cup anteversion (<em>P</em> = .364) with and without the flip technique.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This system provided reliable intraoperative measurements of cup positions, irrespective of the use of the flip technique. However, cup abduction measurements were more accurate without the flip technique, while cup anteversion measurements were more accurate with the flip technique.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of the Flip Technique on Measurement Accuracy of the Acetabular Cup Position Using a Portable Hip Navigation System With Patients in the Lateral Decubitus Position
Background
Accurate cup placement is performed for achieving satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative tools for accurate cup placement. Several factors have been reported to affect their accuracy, including the flip technique, in which the pelvic reference plane is registered in the supine position and the patient is subsequently repositioned to the lateral decubitus position for surgery. The effectiveness of the flip technique remains a subject of debate. Therefore, this study assessed and compared the accuracy of cup position measurements using an inertial portable hip navigation system in the lateral decubitus position.
Methods
Measurement accuracy was assessed in 78 hips. The accuracy of the system was compared with and without the flip technique, employing an identical method for registering the pelvic reference plane. Cup angles displayed on the system during surgery were compared with those measured postoperatively.
Results
Measurement errors with and without the flip technique were 3.7° ± 2.8° and 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction (P = .029) and 2.9° ± 2.5° and 3.9° ± 2.9° for cup anteversion (P = .037). The system achieved measurement errors within 10° in 97 and 98% of hips for cup abduction (P = .636), and 99 and 96% of hips for cup anteversion (P = .364) with and without the flip technique.
Conclusions
This system provided reliable intraoperative measurements of cup positions, irrespective of the use of the flip technique. However, cup abduction measurements were more accurate without the flip technique, while cup anteversion measurements were more accurate with the flip technique.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.