探讨we-talk作为家庭遗传风险沟通动机转化的关系测度

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jingsong Zhao , Yue Guan , Weihua An , Kevin Ward , Colleen M. McBride
{"title":"探讨we-talk作为家庭遗传风险沟通动机转化的关系测度","authors":"Jingsong Zhao ,&nbsp;Yue Guan ,&nbsp;Weihua An ,&nbsp;Kevin Ward ,&nbsp;Colleen M. McBride","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Transformation of motivation” (TM) and communal coping are interrelated social psychological concepts. TM occurs when an individual’s motivation to protect the self is expanded to include the well-being of important others. TM has largely been assessed by we-talk, that is, counts of the use of we pronouns during conversations about shared experiences. The extent to which we-talk adequately captures TM is underexplored. Family cancer genetic risk communication offers an ideal context for expanded understanding of TM.</div><div>We conducted think-aloud interviews with 20 ovarian cancer survivors. We assessed counts of we-talk by survivors, matched with qualitative insights describing relational motives for sharing inherited risk information using deductive thematic analysis. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data from survivors as they navigated through a website developed to foster family cancer genetic risk communication in real-time. Indicators of relational thinking (i.e. thoughts and feelings) that was prompted during this process were assessed to indicate we-problem- and we-responsibility sentiments.</div><div>We found that we-talk was used infrequently (1.0 %; SD=0.4) compared to I-talk (8.6 %; SD=1.0), which is consistent with prior studies. We-problem expanded when there was a known family history of cancer but lessened when survivors perceived relatives had competing life priorities. We-responsibility emerged when considering younger relatives but decreased when survivors perceived that it was others’ responsibility to share the information. This is the first study to match pronoun counts with real-time qualitative insights to explore TM. Future studies are needed to further investigate operationalization of TM in relational-motivation research and family-centered interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring we-talk as a relational measure for transformation of motivation in family genetic risk communication\",\"authors\":\"Jingsong Zhao ,&nbsp;Yue Guan ,&nbsp;Weihua An ,&nbsp;Kevin Ward ,&nbsp;Colleen M. McBride\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>“Transformation of motivation” (TM) and communal coping are interrelated social psychological concepts. TM occurs when an individual’s motivation to protect the self is expanded to include the well-being of important others. TM has largely been assessed by we-talk, that is, counts of the use of we pronouns during conversations about shared experiences. The extent to which we-talk adequately captures TM is underexplored. Family cancer genetic risk communication offers an ideal context for expanded understanding of TM.</div><div>We conducted think-aloud interviews with 20 ovarian cancer survivors. We assessed counts of we-talk by survivors, matched with qualitative insights describing relational motives for sharing inherited risk information using deductive thematic analysis. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data from survivors as they navigated through a website developed to foster family cancer genetic risk communication in real-time. Indicators of relational thinking (i.e. thoughts and feelings) that was prompted during this process were assessed to indicate we-problem- and we-responsibility sentiments.</div><div>We found that we-talk was used infrequently (1.0 %; SD=0.4) compared to I-talk (8.6 %; SD=1.0), which is consistent with prior studies. We-problem expanded when there was a known family history of cancer but lessened when survivors perceived relatives had competing life priorities. We-responsibility emerged when considering younger relatives but decreased when survivors perceived that it was others’ responsibility to share the information. This is the first study to match pronoun counts with real-time qualitative insights to explore TM. Future studies are needed to further investigate operationalization of TM in relational-motivation research and family-centered interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“动机转换”(TM)与共同应对是相互关联的社会心理学概念。当个人保护自我的动机扩展到包括重要他人的幸福时,超觉静坐就会发生。冥想在很大程度上是通过we-talk来评估的,也就是说,在谈论共同经历的谈话中,我们代词的使用次数。“we-talk”在多大程度上充分捕捉到TM还没有得到充分的探索。家庭癌症遗传风险交流为扩大对TM的理解提供了一个理想的环境。我们对20名卵巢癌幸存者进行了思考访谈。我们评估了幸存者的自言自语数量,并使用演绎主题分析描述了分享遗传风险信息的关系动机的定性见解。一份半结构化的访谈指南被用来收集幸存者在浏览一个旨在促进家庭癌症遗传风险实时交流的网站时的数据。在这一过程中产生的关系思维指标(即思想和感觉)被评估为“我们有问题”和“我们有责任”的情绪。我们发现We -talk很少被使用(1.0%;SD=0.4),与I-talk相比(8.6%;SD=1.0),与前人研究一致。当有已知的癌症家族史时,我们的问题会扩大,但当幸存者意识到亲属有竞争的生活优先权时,我们的问题就会减少。当考虑到年轻的亲属时,我们的责任出现了,但当幸存者意识到分享信息是其他人的责任时,我们的责任就减少了。这是第一个将代词计数与实时定性洞察相匹配以探索TM的研究。在关系动机研究和以家庭为中心的干预中,需要进一步研究TM的操作化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring we-talk as a relational measure for transformation of motivation in family genetic risk communication
“Transformation of motivation” (TM) and communal coping are interrelated social psychological concepts. TM occurs when an individual’s motivation to protect the self is expanded to include the well-being of important others. TM has largely been assessed by we-talk, that is, counts of the use of we pronouns during conversations about shared experiences. The extent to which we-talk adequately captures TM is underexplored. Family cancer genetic risk communication offers an ideal context for expanded understanding of TM.
We conducted think-aloud interviews with 20 ovarian cancer survivors. We assessed counts of we-talk by survivors, matched with qualitative insights describing relational motives for sharing inherited risk information using deductive thematic analysis. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect data from survivors as they navigated through a website developed to foster family cancer genetic risk communication in real-time. Indicators of relational thinking (i.e. thoughts and feelings) that was prompted during this process were assessed to indicate we-problem- and we-responsibility sentiments.
We found that we-talk was used infrequently (1.0 %; SD=0.4) compared to I-talk (8.6 %; SD=1.0), which is consistent with prior studies. We-problem expanded when there was a known family history of cancer but lessened when survivors perceived relatives had competing life priorities. We-responsibility emerged when considering younger relatives but decreased when survivors perceived that it was others’ responsibility to share the information. This is the first study to match pronoun counts with real-time qualitative insights to explore TM. Future studies are needed to further investigate operationalization of TM in relational-motivation research and family-centered interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信