为什么研究人员应该谨慎使用PLS-SEM

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jörg Henseler , Florian Schuberth , Nick Lee , Ildikó Kemény
{"title":"为什么研究人员应该谨慎使用PLS-SEM","authors":"Jörg Henseler ,&nbsp;Florian Schuberth ,&nbsp;Nick Lee ,&nbsp;Ildikó Kemény","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A recent contribution to Industrial Marketing Management by Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian, and Cartwright (2023) aims at “[i]mproving PLS-SEM use.” It assumes that the use of PLS-SEM could be improved by more strictly following existing PLS-SEM guidelines and using advanced techniques. Unfortunately, such “improved” use of PLS-SEM does not necessarily translate into more rigorous scientific analyses. In this commentary, we show that the PLS-SEM guidelines themselves are problematic and that using PLS-SEM can lead to erroneous conclusions. It is, therefore, not so much the use of PLS-SEM that needs improvement, but the literature on PLS-SEM itself, particularly its guidelines. The commentary concludes with recommendations for analysts and questions for PLS-SEM proponents to stimulate further research on PLS-SEM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages A8-A15"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why researchers should be cautious about using PLS-SEM\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Henseler ,&nbsp;Florian Schuberth ,&nbsp;Nick Lee ,&nbsp;Ildikó Kemény\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A recent contribution to Industrial Marketing Management by Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian, and Cartwright (2023) aims at “[i]mproving PLS-SEM use.” It assumes that the use of PLS-SEM could be improved by more strictly following existing PLS-SEM guidelines and using advanced techniques. Unfortunately, such “improved” use of PLS-SEM does not necessarily translate into more rigorous scientific analyses. In this commentary, we show that the PLS-SEM guidelines themselves are problematic and that using PLS-SEM can lead to erroneous conclusions. It is, therefore, not so much the use of PLS-SEM that needs improvement, but the literature on PLS-SEM itself, particularly its guidelines. The commentary concludes with recommendations for analysts and questions for PLS-SEM proponents to stimulate further research on PLS-SEM.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages A8-A15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000178\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian和Cartwright(2023)最近对工业营销管理的贡献旨在“改善PLS-SEM的使用”。假设PLS-SEM的使用可以通过更严格地遵循现有的PLS-SEM指南和使用先进的技术来改进。不幸的是,这种“改进”的PLS-SEM使用并不一定转化为更严格的科学分析。在这篇评论中,我们表明PLS-SEM指南本身是有问题的,使用PLS-SEM可能导致错误的结论。因此,需要改进的不是PLS-SEM的使用,而是关于PLS-SEM本身的文献,特别是其指南。评论总结了对分析师的建议和对PLS-SEM支持者的问题,以促进PLS-SEM的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why researchers should be cautious about using PLS-SEM
A recent contribution to Industrial Marketing Management by Guenther, Guenther, Ringle, Zaefarian, and Cartwright (2023) aims at “[i]mproving PLS-SEM use.” It assumes that the use of PLS-SEM could be improved by more strictly following existing PLS-SEM guidelines and using advanced techniques. Unfortunately, such “improved” use of PLS-SEM does not necessarily translate into more rigorous scientific analyses. In this commentary, we show that the PLS-SEM guidelines themselves are problematic and that using PLS-SEM can lead to erroneous conclusions. It is, therefore, not so much the use of PLS-SEM that needs improvement, but the literature on PLS-SEM itself, particularly its guidelines. The commentary concludes with recommendations for analysts and questions for PLS-SEM proponents to stimulate further research on PLS-SEM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信