{"title":"渔业系统概念化:定义分析","authors":"Theodora Sam, Melania Borit","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing fishery systems: An analysis of definitions\",\"authors\":\"Theodora Sam, Melania Borit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002362\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conceptualizing fishery systems: An analysis of definitions
Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.