渔业系统概念化:定义分析

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Theodora Sam, Melania Borit
{"title":"渔业系统概念化:定义分析","authors":"Theodora Sam,&nbsp;Melania Borit","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106821"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing fishery systems: An analysis of definitions\",\"authors\":\"Theodora Sam,&nbsp;Melania Borit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002362\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25002362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将渔业视为一个社会生态系统是渔业科学和渔业管理的一种相对较新的方法。作为对这一观点的新颖贡献的一部分,本研究使用心理模型分析作为一种新方法来深入了解渔业如何概念化。根据已建立的分析心理模型的方法,我们建立了渔业系统的参考模型。然后,将该参考模型与从决策者、对渔业管理影响最大的国际机构以及公众广泛使用的参考材料制定的19个渔业定义中提取的概念化进行比较。通过内容分析,我们调查了这些定义的构成要素是否支持、促进或阻碍了对渔业作为社会生态系统的理解。我们的研究结果表明,虽然这些定义彻底解决了系统生态组成部分的所有已知方面,但所有这些定义都或多或少地缺乏对人和管理组成部分的参考,以及组成部分之间的相互作用。我们希望这项研究将鼓励关于如何定义渔业的进一步讨论,从而使社会生态思维成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualizing fishery systems: An analysis of definitions
Thinking of fisheries as a social-ecological system is a relatively new approach in fisheries science and management. As part of a novel contribution to this perspective, this study uses mental models analysis as a new approach to gain insights into how fisheries might be conceptualized. Following an established methodology for analyzing mental models, we established a reference model of fishery systems. This reference model was then compared with the conceptualization extracted from 19 definitions of fisheries formulated by policy makers, international agencies with the highest influence in fisheries management, and reference material widely used by the general public. By means of content analysis, we investigated whether the constitutive elements of these definitions support, promote, or hinder an understanding of fisheries as social-ecological systems. Our results indicate that, while they thoroughly address all the known aspects of the ecological component of the system, all these definitions lack to a lesser or greater extent references to the human and management components, as well as to interactions among components. We hope that this study will encourage further discussion regarding how to define fisheries so that social-ecological thinking is enabled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信