Keylla Hörbe Steffen dos Santos , Larissa Bennett de Avellar , Daniel Guimarães Gerardi
{"title":"红外热成像在犬肿瘤分类中的可靠性评价","authors":"Keylla Hörbe Steffen dos Santos , Larissa Bennett de Avellar , Daniel Guimarães Gerardi","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infrared thermography (IRT) has been explored as a complementary diagnostic tool in dogs, particularly in oncology. However, few studies have assessed its applicability to non-neoplastic skin tumors or compared thermal patterns between malignant and benign tumors. This study evaluated IRT as a method for distinguishing thermal patterns between healthy skin and cutaneous tumoral lesions in dogs. A total of 103 skin lesions from 57 dogs, either male or female, of different breeds, and average age of 10 years, were analyzed and classified into benign neoplasms, malignant neoplasms, and non-neoplastic tumors. Mean surface temperatures were obtained for three areas: tumoral (El1), transitional (LiM), and healthy adjacent skin (El2). Rectal temperature was also assessed using a digital thermometer. Results showed that, in the malignant neoplasm group, the temperature of El1 was significantly lower when compared to both El2 and LiM within the same group (<em>p</em>= 0.008). Additionally, El1 exhibited slightly higher average temperatures (0.5‐0.6 °C) in the malignant neoplasm (33.2 ± 2.4 °C) and non-neoplastic group (33.5 ± 1.5 °C) compared to benign neoplasms (32.6 ± 2.5 °C), although this difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em>=0.301). In conclusion, IRT is a promising tool for differentiating thermal emissions between skin tumors/lesions and healthy skin in dogs. Healthy areas were significantly warmer than affected tissue. Malignant neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions showed higher thermal means in the tumoral area compared to benign neoplasms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the reliability of the use of infrared thermography in the categorization of tumors in dogs\",\"authors\":\"Keylla Hörbe Steffen dos Santos , Larissa Bennett de Avellar , Daniel Guimarães Gerardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Infrared thermography (IRT) has been explored as a complementary diagnostic tool in dogs, particularly in oncology. However, few studies have assessed its applicability to non-neoplastic skin tumors or compared thermal patterns between malignant and benign tumors. This study evaluated IRT as a method for distinguishing thermal patterns between healthy skin and cutaneous tumoral lesions in dogs. A total of 103 skin lesions from 57 dogs, either male or female, of different breeds, and average age of 10 years, were analyzed and classified into benign neoplasms, malignant neoplasms, and non-neoplastic tumors. Mean surface temperatures were obtained for three areas: tumoral (El1), transitional (LiM), and healthy adjacent skin (El2). Rectal temperature was also assessed using a digital thermometer. Results showed that, in the malignant neoplasm group, the temperature of El1 was significantly lower when compared to both El2 and LiM within the same group (<em>p</em>= 0.008). Additionally, El1 exhibited slightly higher average temperatures (0.5‐0.6 °C) in the malignant neoplasm (33.2 ± 2.4 °C) and non-neoplastic group (33.5 ± 1.5 °C) compared to benign neoplasms (32.6 ± 2.5 °C), although this difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em>=0.301). In conclusion, IRT is a promising tool for differentiating thermal emissions between skin tumors/lesions and healthy skin in dogs. Healthy areas were significantly warmer than affected tissue. Malignant neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions showed higher thermal means in the tumoral area compared to benign neoplasms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in veterinary science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825002590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825002590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the reliability of the use of infrared thermography in the categorization of tumors in dogs
Infrared thermography (IRT) has been explored as a complementary diagnostic tool in dogs, particularly in oncology. However, few studies have assessed its applicability to non-neoplastic skin tumors or compared thermal patterns between malignant and benign tumors. This study evaluated IRT as a method for distinguishing thermal patterns between healthy skin and cutaneous tumoral lesions in dogs. A total of 103 skin lesions from 57 dogs, either male or female, of different breeds, and average age of 10 years, were analyzed and classified into benign neoplasms, malignant neoplasms, and non-neoplastic tumors. Mean surface temperatures were obtained for three areas: tumoral (El1), transitional (LiM), and healthy adjacent skin (El2). Rectal temperature was also assessed using a digital thermometer. Results showed that, in the malignant neoplasm group, the temperature of El1 was significantly lower when compared to both El2 and LiM within the same group (p= 0.008). Additionally, El1 exhibited slightly higher average temperatures (0.5‐0.6 °C) in the malignant neoplasm (33.2 ± 2.4 °C) and non-neoplastic group (33.5 ± 1.5 °C) compared to benign neoplasms (32.6 ± 2.5 °C), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.301). In conclusion, IRT is a promising tool for differentiating thermal emissions between skin tumors/lesions and healthy skin in dogs. Healthy areas were significantly warmer than affected tissue. Malignant neoplasms and non-neoplastic lesions showed higher thermal means in the tumoral area compared to benign neoplasms.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.