两类农林业废弃物垫层材料:微环境动态、微生物群落结构及其对小母牛生长性能的影响

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Bin Wu, Chongchong Zhao, Qiusheng Lv, Weiguang Hao, Guowen Li, Shengjuan Wei
{"title":"两类农林业废弃物垫层材料:微环境动态、微生物群落结构及其对小母牛生长性能的影响","authors":"Bin Wu,&nbsp;Chongchong Zhao,&nbsp;Qiusheng Lv,&nbsp;Weiguang Hao,&nbsp;Guowen Li,&nbsp;Shengjuan Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The economic and ecological benefits of recycled manure solids (RMS) make them a popular choice for bovine bedding. The stable operation of the fermentation-based RMS beds hinges on understanding their internal dynamics. This study utilized sawdust (SD) and fermented cow manure (FCM) as bedding materials to investigate the microenvironmental changes during in situ fermentation and their impacts on heifers. Results demonstrated FCM exhibited lower fermentation temperature, higher nitrate-nitrogen, smaller pH variation rate, and reduced ammonia concentrations, but higher electrical conductivity (EC) and methane emissions compared to SD. Bedding type significantly influenced the composition of both bacterial and fungal communities, whereas bedding duration affected only bacterial community structure. Key physicochemical factors shaping microbial communities included EC, C/N ratio, total nitrogen, water content, temperature, pH, organic matter and nitrate-nitrogen; ammonium nitrogen exclusively impacted fungal communities. Predictive functional analysis of bacteria revealed higher relative abundances of metabolic pathways related to nucleotide metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and genetic information processing in FCM bedding. Notably, bedding type had no significant effects on heifers’ growth performance and serum parameters. This research provides a theoretical foundation for the resource utilization of cattle manure and scientific management of bedding materials in livestock systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104364"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two types of agroforestry wastes as bedding materials: Microenvironmental dynamics, microbial community structure, and impacts on growth performance of heifers\",\"authors\":\"Bin Wu,&nbsp;Chongchong Zhao,&nbsp;Qiusheng Lv,&nbsp;Weiguang Hao,&nbsp;Guowen Li,&nbsp;Shengjuan Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The economic and ecological benefits of recycled manure solids (RMS) make them a popular choice for bovine bedding. The stable operation of the fermentation-based RMS beds hinges on understanding their internal dynamics. This study utilized sawdust (SD) and fermented cow manure (FCM) as bedding materials to investigate the microenvironmental changes during in situ fermentation and their impacts on heifers. Results demonstrated FCM exhibited lower fermentation temperature, higher nitrate-nitrogen, smaller pH variation rate, and reduced ammonia concentrations, but higher electrical conductivity (EC) and methane emissions compared to SD. Bedding type significantly influenced the composition of both bacterial and fungal communities, whereas bedding duration affected only bacterial community structure. Key physicochemical factors shaping microbial communities included EC, C/N ratio, total nitrogen, water content, temperature, pH, organic matter and nitrate-nitrogen; ammonium nitrogen exclusively impacted fungal communities. Predictive functional analysis of bacteria revealed higher relative abundances of metabolic pathways related to nucleotide metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and genetic information processing in FCM bedding. Notably, bedding type had no significant effects on heifers’ growth performance and serum parameters. This research provides a theoretical foundation for the resource utilization of cattle manure and scientific management of bedding materials in livestock systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回收粪便固体(RMS)的经济和生态效益使它们成为牛垫料的热门选择。基于发酵的RMS床的稳定运行取决于对其内部动力学的了解。以木屑(SD)和发酵牛粪(FCM)为垫料,研究原位发酵过程中微环境的变化及其对犊牛的影响。结果表明,与SD相比,FCM具有更低的发酵温度、更高的硝酸盐氮、更小的pH变化率和更低的氨浓度,但更高的电导率和甲烷排放量。层理类型对细菌和真菌群落组成均有显著影响,而层理时间仅影响细菌群落结构。形成微生物群落的关键理化因素包括EC、C/N比、总氮、含水量、温度、pH、有机质和硝酸盐氮;铵态氮只影响真菌群落。细菌预测功能分析显示,FCM垫层中与核苷酸代谢、碳水化合物代谢和遗传信息处理相关的代谢途径相对丰度较高。床褥类型对犊牛生长性能和血清指标影响不显著。本研究为畜禽系统中牛粪资源化利用和垫料科学管理提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two types of agroforestry wastes as bedding materials: Microenvironmental dynamics, microbial community structure, and impacts on growth performance of heifers
The economic and ecological benefits of recycled manure solids (RMS) make them a popular choice for bovine bedding. The stable operation of the fermentation-based RMS beds hinges on understanding their internal dynamics. This study utilized sawdust (SD) and fermented cow manure (FCM) as bedding materials to investigate the microenvironmental changes during in situ fermentation and their impacts on heifers. Results demonstrated FCM exhibited lower fermentation temperature, higher nitrate-nitrogen, smaller pH variation rate, and reduced ammonia concentrations, but higher electrical conductivity (EC) and methane emissions compared to SD. Bedding type significantly influenced the composition of both bacterial and fungal communities, whereas bedding duration affected only bacterial community structure. Key physicochemical factors shaping microbial communities included EC, C/N ratio, total nitrogen, water content, temperature, pH, organic matter and nitrate-nitrogen; ammonium nitrogen exclusively impacted fungal communities. Predictive functional analysis of bacteria revealed higher relative abundances of metabolic pathways related to nucleotide metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and genetic information processing in FCM bedding. Notably, bedding type had no significant effects on heifers’ growth performance and serum parameters. This research provides a theoretical foundation for the resource utilization of cattle manure and scientific management of bedding materials in livestock systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信