Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo , Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran , Thi-Viet-Huong Dao , Cong-Sac Tran , Chi-Tuan Mai , Mai-Nhu Hoang , Nhu-Nguyet Phan , Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo , Piet N.L. Lens , Xuan-Thanh Bui
{"title":"利用浮动处理湿地进行运河修复:以越南胡志明市为例","authors":"Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo , Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran , Thi-Viet-Huong Dao , Cong-Sac Tran , Chi-Tuan Mai , Mai-Nhu Hoang , Nhu-Nguyet Phan , Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo , Piet N.L. Lens , Xuan-Thanh Bui","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The <em>Escherichia coli</em> concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce <em>E. coli</em> concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104354"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing floating treatment wetlands for canal remediation: A case study from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo , Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran , Thi-Viet-Huong Dao , Cong-Sac Tran , Chi-Tuan Mai , Mai-Nhu Hoang , Nhu-Nguyet Phan , Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo , Piet N.L. Lens , Xuan-Thanh Bui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The <em>Escherichia coli</em> concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce <em>E. coli</em> concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003402\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilizing floating treatment wetlands for canal remediation: A case study from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The Escherichia coli concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL−1 and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL−1 in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce E. coli concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.