利用浮动处理湿地进行运河修复:以越南胡志明市为例

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo , Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran , Thi-Viet-Huong Dao , Cong-Sac Tran , Chi-Tuan Mai , Mai-Nhu Hoang , Nhu-Nguyet Phan , Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo , Piet N.L. Lens , Xuan-Thanh Bui
{"title":"利用浮动处理湿地进行运河修复:以越南胡志明市为例","authors":"Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo ,&nbsp;Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran ,&nbsp;Thi-Viet-Huong Dao ,&nbsp;Cong-Sac Tran ,&nbsp;Chi-Tuan Mai ,&nbsp;Mai-Nhu Hoang ,&nbsp;Nhu-Nguyet Phan ,&nbsp;Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo ,&nbsp;Piet N.L. Lens ,&nbsp;Xuan-Thanh Bui","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The <em>Escherichia coli</em> concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce <em>E. coli</em> concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104354"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing floating treatment wetlands for canal remediation: A case study from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Thi-Kim-Quyen Vo ,&nbsp;Pham-Yen-Nhi Tran ,&nbsp;Thi-Viet-Huong Dao ,&nbsp;Cong-Sac Tran ,&nbsp;Chi-Tuan Mai ,&nbsp;Mai-Nhu Hoang ,&nbsp;Nhu-Nguyet Phan ,&nbsp;Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo ,&nbsp;Piet N.L. Lens ,&nbsp;Xuan-Thanh Bui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The <em>Escherichia coli</em> concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL<sup>−1</sup> in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce <em>E. coli</em> concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003402\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浮式处理湿地(FTW)技术在处理运河水方面具有巨大的潜力。大多数研究的系统都是实验室规模的,因此很难评估将FTW系统应用于实际运河或其他水体的可行性。本研究将三种不同配置的FTW-advanced(采用竹茎制作浮力框架,安装在塑料机架单元上)、FTW-PVC(采用聚氯乙烯管制作浮力框架,安装在塑料网上)和FTW-bamboo(采用竹茎制作浮力框架,安装在塑料网上)分别安装在动水通道(Hang Bang-A)和静态通道(Hang Bang-B)中。结果表明,FTW系统在Hang Bang-B渠的有机物去除率为23% %,总氮去除率为34% %,而在Hang Bang-A渠的有机物去除率为19% %,总氮去除率为17% %。恒邦a管大肠杆菌浓度为4.6 ~ 4.9 log CFU 100 mL−1,恒邦b管大肠杆菌浓度约为4.3 log CFU 100 mL−1。在操作过程中未能降低大肠杆菌浓度表明FTW系统在治疗病原体方面存在局限性。此外,FTWs还有助于城市绿地和区域生态系统的生物多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing floating treatment wetlands for canal remediation: A case study from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
The floating treatment wetland (FTW) technology has significant potential for treating canal water. Most studied systems are lab-scale, so it is difficult to evaluate the feasibility of applying FTW systems to real canals or other water bodies. In this study, three FTWs with different configurations including FTW–advanced (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic rack units), FTW–PVC (with buoyant frames made by polyvinylchloride pipes and planted on plastic nets), and FTW–bamboo (with buoyant frames made by bamboo stems and planted on plastic nets) were installed in a canal with hydrodynamic flow (Hang Bang–A) and in a static canal (Hang Bang–B). The results indicated that FTW systems achieved a better performance in the Hang Bang–B canal with removal efficiencies of 23 % of organic matter, and 34 % of total nitrogen, compared to 19 % of organic matter, and 17 % of total nitrogen in the Hang Bang–A canal. The Escherichia coli concentration measured in Hang Bang–A canal was 4.6 – 4.9 log CFU 100 mL−1 and around 4.3 log CFU 100 mL−1 in Hang Bang–B canal. The failure to reduce E. coli concentrations during operation demonstrates that the FTW system has a limitation in treating pathogens. Additionally, the FTWs contribute to urban green space and the biodiversity of regional ecosystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信