地点的意义:交通领域基于地点的研究的新框架

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Liton Kamruzzaman , Matthew J. Diemer , Graham Currie , Allan Pimenta , Chris De Gruyter , Ian Hopkins
{"title":"地点的意义:交通领域基于地点的研究的新框架","authors":"Liton Kamruzzaman ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Diemer ,&nbsp;Graham Currie ,&nbsp;Allan Pimenta ,&nbsp;Chris De Gruyter ,&nbsp;Ian Hopkins","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2025.2494025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transitional process from “space” to the more complex “place”, through human-assigned locational significance, has garnered significant interest in various disciplines including psychology (e.g. place attachment, place identity), urban planning (e.g. new urbanism, placemaking), and transport (e.g. transit-oriented development, complete street). This interest has yielded valuable yet fragmented insights and definitional inconsistencies in place-based terminologies resulting in perceived disorganisation of the literature and hindrance to transdisciplinary scholarship. This study aims to bring these disciplinary scholarships into a unified conceptual framework to foster interdisciplinary discourse, understanding, and collaboration. Based on a scoping review of 194 journal articles and conference papers, 13 books, and 2 reports, the study found that places are studied from the perspective of “interpreters”, “shapers”, and “connecters”. The place-based vocabularies and methodologies as used within each of these perspectives are synthesised, defined, and framed to enable cross-disciplinary discourse. The framework outlines the strength of interlinkages among the three perspectives, with shapers serving as an intermediary between interpreters and connecters, borrowing concepts and methods from both ends of the spectrum (e.g. subjective vs. objective analysis of places). Significant gaps in research among the linkages are presented, paving the way for future collaboration and understanding of places in the context of transport research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"45 4","pages":"Pages 573-604"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making sense of place: a new framework for place-based research in the transport realm\",\"authors\":\"Liton Kamruzzaman ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Diemer ,&nbsp;Graham Currie ,&nbsp;Allan Pimenta ,&nbsp;Chris De Gruyter ,&nbsp;Ian Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01441647.2025.2494025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The transitional process from “space” to the more complex “place”, through human-assigned locational significance, has garnered significant interest in various disciplines including psychology (e.g. place attachment, place identity), urban planning (e.g. new urbanism, placemaking), and transport (e.g. transit-oriented development, complete street). This interest has yielded valuable yet fragmented insights and definitional inconsistencies in place-based terminologies resulting in perceived disorganisation of the literature and hindrance to transdisciplinary scholarship. This study aims to bring these disciplinary scholarships into a unified conceptual framework to foster interdisciplinary discourse, understanding, and collaboration. Based on a scoping review of 194 journal articles and conference papers, 13 books, and 2 reports, the study found that places are studied from the perspective of “interpreters”, “shapers”, and “connecters”. The place-based vocabularies and methodologies as used within each of these perspectives are synthesised, defined, and framed to enable cross-disciplinary discourse. The framework outlines the strength of interlinkages among the three perspectives, with shapers serving as an intermediary between interpreters and connecters, borrowing concepts and methods from both ends of the spectrum (e.g. subjective vs. objective analysis of places). Significant gaps in research among the linkages are presented, paving the way for future collaboration and understanding of places in the context of transport research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 573-604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000157\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从“空间”到更复杂的“地点”的过渡过程,通过人为分配的位置意义,已经引起了各种学科的极大兴趣,包括心理学(如地点依恋、地点认同)、城市规划(如新城市主义、场所营造)和交通(如公共交通导向发展、完整街道)。这种兴趣产生了有价值但支离破碎的见解和基于地点的术语的定义不一致,导致了文献的混乱和跨学科学术的障碍。本研究旨在将这些学科奖学金纳入一个统一的概念框架,以促进跨学科的话语、理解和合作。基于对194篇期刊论文和会议论文、13本书和2份报告的范围审查,该研究发现,人们从“解释者”、“塑造者”和“连接者”的角度对地方进行了研究。在这些观点中使用的基于地点的词汇和方法被综合、定义和框架,以实现跨学科的话语。该框架概述了三种视角之间相互联系的强度,塑造者充当了解释者和连接者之间的中介,借用了光谱两端的概念和方法(例如,对地点的主观与客观分析)。这些联系之间的研究存在重大差距,为未来在交通研究背景下的合作和对地方的理解铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Making sense of place: a new framework for place-based research in the transport realm
The transitional process from “space” to the more complex “place”, through human-assigned locational significance, has garnered significant interest in various disciplines including psychology (e.g. place attachment, place identity), urban planning (e.g. new urbanism, placemaking), and transport (e.g. transit-oriented development, complete street). This interest has yielded valuable yet fragmented insights and definitional inconsistencies in place-based terminologies resulting in perceived disorganisation of the literature and hindrance to transdisciplinary scholarship. This study aims to bring these disciplinary scholarships into a unified conceptual framework to foster interdisciplinary discourse, understanding, and collaboration. Based on a scoping review of 194 journal articles and conference papers, 13 books, and 2 reports, the study found that places are studied from the perspective of “interpreters”, “shapers”, and “connecters”. The place-based vocabularies and methodologies as used within each of these perspectives are synthesised, defined, and framed to enable cross-disciplinary discourse. The framework outlines the strength of interlinkages among the three perspectives, with shapers serving as an intermediary between interpreters and connecters, borrowing concepts and methods from both ends of the spectrum (e.g. subjective vs. objective analysis of places). Significant gaps in research among the linkages are presented, paving the way for future collaboration and understanding of places in the context of transport research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信