Qingzhu Zhang, Yunfei Mu, Hongjie Jia, Xiaodan Yu, Kai Hou
{"title":"岛屿微电网优化混合氢电池储能规划:TSA-THC方法解决多时间尺度失衡","authors":"Qingzhu Zhang, Yunfei Mu, Hongjie Jia, Xiaodan Yu, Kai Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The high volatility of renewable energy presents significant challenges for electricity balancing in off-grid island microgrids (OGIM) across multiple time scales. Hybrid hydrogen-battery storage (HHBS) offers an effective solution to mitigate electricity imbalances over various time horizons. However, planning HHBS typically requires year-round operational considerations, leading to substantial computational complexity due to the large number of variables. To address this challenge, a novel planning method that integrates time series aggregation (TSA) and time horizon compression (THC) is proposed to optimize computational efficiency without compromising planning accuracy. This method preserves the long operational cycle characteristics of hydrogen storage (HS) while minimizing battery-related variables, thus ensuring a balance between computational feasibility and accuracy. The THC method reduces the battery operation time scale to increase computational efficiency, whereas the TSA guides the operation sequence, ensuring precise battery planning. An HHBS planning model is developed to co-optimize HHBS capacity across different time scales, minimizing combined costs, including investment, operation, maintenance, curtailment, load shedding, and fuel costs. Source-load uncertainty on islands is modelled using intervals, and the uncertain planning model is converted into a deterministic model via the interval optimization (IO) method. Case studies on the OGIM in the South China Sea validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, reducing the computational time by 50.33 % and limiting the HHBS capacity error to no more than 0.87 % compared with the year-round time scale method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"398 ","pages":"Article 126405"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimized hybrid hydrogen-battery storage planning for Island microgrids: A TSA-THC approach for addressing multi-time-scale imbalances\",\"authors\":\"Qingzhu Zhang, Yunfei Mu, Hongjie Jia, Xiaodan Yu, Kai Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The high volatility of renewable energy presents significant challenges for electricity balancing in off-grid island microgrids (OGIM) across multiple time scales. Hybrid hydrogen-battery storage (HHBS) offers an effective solution to mitigate electricity imbalances over various time horizons. However, planning HHBS typically requires year-round operational considerations, leading to substantial computational complexity due to the large number of variables. To address this challenge, a novel planning method that integrates time series aggregation (TSA) and time horizon compression (THC) is proposed to optimize computational efficiency without compromising planning accuracy. This method preserves the long operational cycle characteristics of hydrogen storage (HS) while minimizing battery-related variables, thus ensuring a balance between computational feasibility and accuracy. The THC method reduces the battery operation time scale to increase computational efficiency, whereas the TSA guides the operation sequence, ensuring precise battery planning. An HHBS planning model is developed to co-optimize HHBS capacity across different time scales, minimizing combined costs, including investment, operation, maintenance, curtailment, load shedding, and fuel costs. Source-load uncertainty on islands is modelled using intervals, and the uncertain planning model is converted into a deterministic model via the interval optimization (IO) method. Case studies on the OGIM in the South China Sea validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, reducing the computational time by 50.33 % and limiting the HHBS capacity error to no more than 0.87 % compared with the year-round time scale method.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"398 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925011353\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925011353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimized hybrid hydrogen-battery storage planning for Island microgrids: A TSA-THC approach for addressing multi-time-scale imbalances
The high volatility of renewable energy presents significant challenges for electricity balancing in off-grid island microgrids (OGIM) across multiple time scales. Hybrid hydrogen-battery storage (HHBS) offers an effective solution to mitigate electricity imbalances over various time horizons. However, planning HHBS typically requires year-round operational considerations, leading to substantial computational complexity due to the large number of variables. To address this challenge, a novel planning method that integrates time series aggregation (TSA) and time horizon compression (THC) is proposed to optimize computational efficiency without compromising planning accuracy. This method preserves the long operational cycle characteristics of hydrogen storage (HS) while minimizing battery-related variables, thus ensuring a balance between computational feasibility and accuracy. The THC method reduces the battery operation time scale to increase computational efficiency, whereas the TSA guides the operation sequence, ensuring precise battery planning. An HHBS planning model is developed to co-optimize HHBS capacity across different time scales, minimizing combined costs, including investment, operation, maintenance, curtailment, load shedding, and fuel costs. Source-load uncertainty on islands is modelled using intervals, and the uncertain planning model is converted into a deterministic model via the interval optimization (IO) method. Case studies on the OGIM in the South China Sea validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, reducing the computational time by 50.33 % and limiting the HHBS capacity error to no more than 0.87 % compared with the year-round time scale method.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.