Sarah M. Coyne , Megan Van Alfen , Phia James , Talise Hirschi , Rebecca Lin Densley , Chenae Christensen-Duerden , Jane Shawcroft , Drew P. Cingel , Joseph Olsen
{"title":"谁在使用社交媒体后最有可能出现身体自尊问题?青少年的差异易感性方法","authors":"Sarah M. Coyne , Megan Van Alfen , Phia James , Talise Hirschi , Rebecca Lin Densley , Chenae Christensen-Duerden , Jane Shawcroft , Drew P. Cingel , Joseph Olsen","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A growing body of research indicates a negative association between adolescent social media use and body esteem. However, the factors that increase differential susceptibility to adverse outcomes remain underexplored. This study employs the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model and Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to examine individual differences (n = 1) in the impact of social media on body esteem and body positivity. The sample consisted of 183 adolescents aged 12–17 who completed a series of short questionnaires up to four times a day over a 17-day period. Findings indicate that time spent on social media alone was not associated with body esteem. There was substantial variability in the impact of social media on body esteem, with 47 % experiencing neutral effects, 36 % experiencing negative effects, and 17 % experiencing positive effects. Similar results were found for body positivity. Additionally, being female, exhibiting problematic media use behaviors, and having perfectionist tendencies predicted membership in the negative body esteem and body positivity groups. Furthermore, adolescents reporting higher eating disorder symptoms were more likely to experience decreased body positivity after using social media. Collectively, these results support taking a differential view to social media effects on adolescents which may inform educators, parents, and policymakers as they help guide adolescents and their use of social media.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100737"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is most at risk for body esteem problems after being on social media? A differential susceptibility approach with adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M. Coyne , Megan Van Alfen , Phia James , Talise Hirschi , Rebecca Lin Densley , Chenae Christensen-Duerden , Jane Shawcroft , Drew P. Cingel , Joseph Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A growing body of research indicates a negative association between adolescent social media use and body esteem. However, the factors that increase differential susceptibility to adverse outcomes remain underexplored. This study employs the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model and Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to examine individual differences (n = 1) in the impact of social media on body esteem and body positivity. The sample consisted of 183 adolescents aged 12–17 who completed a series of short questionnaires up to four times a day over a 17-day period. Findings indicate that time spent on social media alone was not associated with body esteem. There was substantial variability in the impact of social media on body esteem, with 47 % experiencing neutral effects, 36 % experiencing negative effects, and 17 % experiencing positive effects. Similar results were found for body positivity. Additionally, being female, exhibiting problematic media use behaviors, and having perfectionist tendencies predicted membership in the negative body esteem and body positivity groups. Furthermore, adolescents reporting higher eating disorder symptoms were more likely to experience decreased body positivity after using social media. Collectively, these results support taking a differential view to social media effects on adolescents which may inform educators, parents, and policymakers as they help guide adolescents and their use of social media.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的研究表明,青少年使用社交媒体与身体自尊之间存在负相关。然而,增加对不良结果的不同易感性的因素仍未得到充分探讨。本研究采用媒介效应差异敏感性模型(Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model)和生态瞬间评估(Ecological transient Assessment, EMA)来检验社交媒体对身体自尊和身体积极度影响的个体差异(n = 1)。样本由183名12-17岁的青少年组成,他们在17天的时间里每天完成四次简短的问卷调查。研究结果表明,只花在社交媒体上的时间与身体自尊无关。社交媒体对身体自尊的影响存在很大差异,47%的人有中性影响,36%的人有负面影响,17%的人有积极影响。身体呈阳性也有类似的结果。此外,作为女性,表现出有问题的媒体使用行为,以及有完美主义倾向,都预示着她们会加入消极的身体自尊组和积极的身体自尊组。此外,报告饮食失调症状较高的青少年在使用社交媒体后更有可能经历身体积极性下降。总的来说,这些结果支持对社交媒体对青少年的影响采取不同的看法,这可能会为教育工作者、父母和政策制定者提供信息,因为他们有助于指导青少年及其使用社交媒体。
Who is most at risk for body esteem problems after being on social media? A differential susceptibility approach with adolescents
A growing body of research indicates a negative association between adolescent social media use and body esteem. However, the factors that increase differential susceptibility to adverse outcomes remain underexplored. This study employs the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model and Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to examine individual differences (n = 1) in the impact of social media on body esteem and body positivity. The sample consisted of 183 adolescents aged 12–17 who completed a series of short questionnaires up to four times a day over a 17-day period. Findings indicate that time spent on social media alone was not associated with body esteem. There was substantial variability in the impact of social media on body esteem, with 47 % experiencing neutral effects, 36 % experiencing negative effects, and 17 % experiencing positive effects. Similar results were found for body positivity. Additionally, being female, exhibiting problematic media use behaviors, and having perfectionist tendencies predicted membership in the negative body esteem and body positivity groups. Furthermore, adolescents reporting higher eating disorder symptoms were more likely to experience decreased body positivity after using social media. Collectively, these results support taking a differential view to social media effects on adolescents which may inform educators, parents, and policymakers as they help guide adolescents and their use of social media.