Caroline L Ward,Ann C Childress,Na Jin,Osman Turkoglu,Taisa Skubiak,Timothy E Wilens
{"title":"西他那定治疗青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Caroline L Ward,Ann C Childress,Na Jin,Osman Turkoglu,Taisa Skubiak,Timothy E Wilens","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of centanafadine-a norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin reuptake inhibitor-in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nAdolescents (ages 13-17 years, inclusive) with a primary diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to once-daily centanafadine 164.4 mg, 328.8 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Dosing was not titrated. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the ADHD Rating Scale, version 5 (ADHD-RS-5) symptoms total raw score at Week 6. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05257265).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 459 participants (centanafadine 164.4 mg, n=155; 328.8 mg, n=155; placebo, n=149), 451 received ≥1 dose of study drug and 371 (80.8%) completed the trial. At Week 6, improvements in ADHD-RS-5 symptoms total raw score were significantly greater with centanafadine 328.8 mg than with placebo (-18.50 [0.93] vs -14.15 [0.93]; p=0.0006); centanafadine 164.4 mg did not meet the primary endpoint. Centanafadine 328.8 mg showed separation from placebo at Week 1, the first post-baseline timepoint, with the effect maintained throughout the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 48/153 (31.4%, 164.4 mg), 76/151 (50.3%, 328.8 mg), and 35/147 (23.8%, placebo) participants. The most common (≥5% any group) TEAEs were decreased appetite, nausea, headache, and rash. Most TEAEs were of mild or moderate severity; 3 events were severe: liver function test increased (n=1, 164.4 mg); aggression (n=1, 164.4 mg); and somnolence (n=1, placebo).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nCentanafadine 328.8 mg was efficacious for ADHD treatment in adolescents. Both doses were generally safe and well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centanafadine for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline L Ward,Ann C Childress,Na Jin,Osman Turkoglu,Taisa Skubiak,Timothy E Wilens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of centanafadine-a norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin reuptake inhibitor-in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nAdolescents (ages 13-17 years, inclusive) with a primary diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to once-daily centanafadine 164.4 mg, 328.8 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Dosing was not titrated. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the ADHD Rating Scale, version 5 (ADHD-RS-5) symptoms total raw score at Week 6. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05257265).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 459 participants (centanafadine 164.4 mg, n=155; 328.8 mg, n=155; placebo, n=149), 451 received ≥1 dose of study drug and 371 (80.8%) completed the trial. At Week 6, improvements in ADHD-RS-5 symptoms total raw score were significantly greater with centanafadine 328.8 mg than with placebo (-18.50 [0.93] vs -14.15 [0.93]; p=0.0006); centanafadine 164.4 mg did not meet the primary endpoint. Centanafadine 328.8 mg showed separation from placebo at Week 1, the first post-baseline timepoint, with the effect maintained throughout the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 48/153 (31.4%, 164.4 mg), 76/151 (50.3%, 328.8 mg), and 35/147 (23.8%, placebo) participants. The most common (≥5% any group) TEAEs were decreased appetite, nausea, headache, and rash. Most TEAEs were of mild or moderate severity; 3 events were severe: liver function test increased (n=1, 164.4 mg); aggression (n=1, 164.4 mg); and somnolence (n=1, placebo).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nCentanafadine 328.8 mg was efficacious for ADHD treatment in adolescents. Both doses were generally safe and well tolerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Centanafadine for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
OBJECTIVE
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of centanafadine-a norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin reuptake inhibitor-in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents.
METHOD
Adolescents (ages 13-17 years, inclusive) with a primary diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to once-daily centanafadine 164.4 mg, 328.8 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Dosing was not titrated. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the ADHD Rating Scale, version 5 (ADHD-RS-5) symptoms total raw score at Week 6. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05257265).
RESULTS
Of 459 participants (centanafadine 164.4 mg, n=155; 328.8 mg, n=155; placebo, n=149), 451 received ≥1 dose of study drug and 371 (80.8%) completed the trial. At Week 6, improvements in ADHD-RS-5 symptoms total raw score were significantly greater with centanafadine 328.8 mg than with placebo (-18.50 [0.93] vs -14.15 [0.93]; p=0.0006); centanafadine 164.4 mg did not meet the primary endpoint. Centanafadine 328.8 mg showed separation from placebo at Week 1, the first post-baseline timepoint, with the effect maintained throughout the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 48/153 (31.4%, 164.4 mg), 76/151 (50.3%, 328.8 mg), and 35/147 (23.8%, placebo) participants. The most common (≥5% any group) TEAEs were decreased appetite, nausea, headache, and rash. Most TEAEs were of mild or moderate severity; 3 events were severe: liver function test increased (n=1, 164.4 mg); aggression (n=1, 164.4 mg); and somnolence (n=1, placebo).
CONCLUSION
Centanafadine 328.8 mg was efficacious for ADHD treatment in adolescents. Both doses were generally safe and well tolerated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families.
We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings.
In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health.
At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.