白杨阻碍野火在美国西南部的蔓延。

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Matthew P. Harris, Jonathan D. Coop, Jared A. Balik, Jessika R. McFarland, Sean A. Parks, Camille S. Stevens-Rumann
{"title":"白杨阻碍野火在美国西南部的蔓延。","authors":"Matthew P. Harris,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Coop,&nbsp;Jared A. Balik,&nbsp;Jessika R. McFarland,&nbsp;Sean A. Parks,&nbsp;Camille S. Stevens-Rumann","doi":"10.1002/eap.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aspen (<i>Populus tremuloides</i>) forests are generally thought to impede fire spread, yet the extent of this effect is not well quantified in relation to other vegetation types. We examined the influence of aspen cover on interpolated daily fire spread rates, the relative abundance of aspen at fire perimeters versus burn interiors, and whether these relationships shifted under more fire-conducive atmospheric conditions. Our study incorporated 314 fires occurring between 2001 and 2020 in the southwestern United States and a suite of gridded vegetation, topography, and fire weather predictor variables. We found that aspen slows fire progression: as aspen cover on the landscape increased, daily area burned and linear spread rate decreased. Where aspen cover was &lt;10%, daily fire growth averaged 1112 ha/day and maximum linear spread was 2.1 km/day; where aspen exceeded 25%, these values dropped to 368 ha/day and 1.3 km/day. Aspen also serves as a barrier to fire spread, demonstrated through a higher proportion of aspen cover at fire perimeters than in burn interiors. Finally, though favorable fire weather conditions increased fire growth rates, differences between aspens and conifers persisted. Our results affirm that aspen stands can act as a firebreak, with clear applications for vegetation management. For example, interventions that shift conifer to aspen cover could lessen the risk of fire for nearby values at risk (e.g., communities, infrastructure) but still support forest ecosystem function. Further, wildfire-driven conversion from conifer to aspen forest types in some landscapes may produce a negative feedback that could dampen expected increases in fire activity under a warmer and drier climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspen impedes wildfire spread in southwestern United States landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Matthew P. Harris,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Coop,&nbsp;Jared A. Balik,&nbsp;Jessika R. McFarland,&nbsp;Sean A. Parks,&nbsp;Camille S. Stevens-Rumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aspen (<i>Populus tremuloides</i>) forests are generally thought to impede fire spread, yet the extent of this effect is not well quantified in relation to other vegetation types. We examined the influence of aspen cover on interpolated daily fire spread rates, the relative abundance of aspen at fire perimeters versus burn interiors, and whether these relationships shifted under more fire-conducive atmospheric conditions. Our study incorporated 314 fires occurring between 2001 and 2020 in the southwestern United States and a suite of gridded vegetation, topography, and fire weather predictor variables. We found that aspen slows fire progression: as aspen cover on the landscape increased, daily area burned and linear spread rate decreased. Where aspen cover was &lt;10%, daily fire growth averaged 1112 ha/day and maximum linear spread was 2.1 km/day; where aspen exceeded 25%, these values dropped to 368 ha/day and 1.3 km/day. Aspen also serves as a barrier to fire spread, demonstrated through a higher proportion of aspen cover at fire perimeters than in burn interiors. Finally, though favorable fire weather conditions increased fire growth rates, differences between aspens and conifers persisted. Our results affirm that aspen stands can act as a firebreak, with clear applications for vegetation management. For example, interventions that shift conifer to aspen cover could lessen the risk of fire for nearby values at risk (e.g., communities, infrastructure) but still support forest ecosystem function. Further, wildfire-driven conversion from conifer to aspen forest types in some landscapes may produce a negative feedback that could dampen expected increases in fire activity under a warmer and drier climate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们通常认为白杨(白杨)森林可以阻止火灾蔓延,但这种影响的程度与其他植被类型的关系还没有很好地量化。我们研究了白杨覆盖对插值的每日火灾蔓延率的影响,白杨在火灾周长与燃烧内部的相对丰度,以及这些关系是否在更有利于火灾的大气条件下发生变化。我们的研究纳入了2001年至2020年间发生在美国西南部的314起火灾,以及一套网格化的植被、地形和火灾天气预测变量。我们发现白杨减缓了火灾的发展:随着白杨在景观上的覆盖增加,日燃烧面积和线性蔓延率下降。当白杨盖度<10%时,日平均生长量为1112 ha/d,最大线性扩展为2.1 km/d;当白杨超过25%时,这些值下降到368 ha/d和1.3 km/d。杨木还可以作为火灾蔓延的屏障,通过在火灾周边比在燃烧内部覆盖更高比例的杨木来证明。最后,尽管有利的火灾天气条件增加了火灾生长速率,但白杨和针叶树之间的差异仍然存在。我们的研究结果证实,白杨林可以作为防火屏障,在植被管理中具有明确的应用。例如,将针叶树覆盖转移到白杨覆盖的干预措施可以减少附近处于危险中的价值(例如,社区,基础设施)的火灾风险,但仍然支持森林生态系统功能。此外,在一些景观中,野火驱动的从针叶林到白杨林类型的转换可能产生负反馈,这可能会抑制在更温暖和更干燥的气候下预期的火灾活动增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Aspen impedes wildfire spread in southwestern United States landscapes

Aspen impedes wildfire spread in southwestern United States landscapes

Aspen (Populus tremuloides) forests are generally thought to impede fire spread, yet the extent of this effect is not well quantified in relation to other vegetation types. We examined the influence of aspen cover on interpolated daily fire spread rates, the relative abundance of aspen at fire perimeters versus burn interiors, and whether these relationships shifted under more fire-conducive atmospheric conditions. Our study incorporated 314 fires occurring between 2001 and 2020 in the southwestern United States and a suite of gridded vegetation, topography, and fire weather predictor variables. We found that aspen slows fire progression: as aspen cover on the landscape increased, daily area burned and linear spread rate decreased. Where aspen cover was <10%, daily fire growth averaged 1112 ha/day and maximum linear spread was 2.1 km/day; where aspen exceeded 25%, these values dropped to 368 ha/day and 1.3 km/day. Aspen also serves as a barrier to fire spread, demonstrated through a higher proportion of aspen cover at fire perimeters than in burn interiors. Finally, though favorable fire weather conditions increased fire growth rates, differences between aspens and conifers persisted. Our results affirm that aspen stands can act as a firebreak, with clear applications for vegetation management. For example, interventions that shift conifer to aspen cover could lessen the risk of fire for nearby values at risk (e.g., communities, infrastructure) but still support forest ecosystem function. Further, wildfire-driven conversion from conifer to aspen forest types in some landscapes may produce a negative feedback that could dampen expected increases in fire activity under a warmer and drier climate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信