肺癌靶体积在PET-CT和基于ct的剂量计规划中的定义。

IF 1.3
Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain
{"title":"肺癌靶体积在PET-CT和基于ct的剂量计规划中的定义。","authors":"Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 3","pages":"547-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target volume definition of lung cancer between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning.\",\"authors\":\"Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"547-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌是世界上最常见的癌症,发病率和死亡率分别为12.4%和18.7%。正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)通过检测远处胸外或非区域淋巴结转移,有助于降低分期T标准和提高分期。目的:比较PET-CT与基于ct的剂量计划在肺癌患者肿瘤体积、受病灶淋巴结数量及位置等具体治疗计划参数上的靶体积定义。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,对50例组织学证实的非小细胞肺癌患者进行了研究。两组目标体分别独立轮廓,一组基于融合的PET-CT图像,另一组基于单独的CT。结果:基于CT的总肿瘤体积为130.84 cc, PET的总肿瘤体积为95.84 cc, PET-CT总体平均比CT缩小35 cc, P值为0.004,差异有统计学意义。临床靶体积也有类似的趋势,P值为0.005。PET-CT与ct衍生方案的正常组织剂量V20 (P = 0.418)、肺平均剂量(P = 0.185)、食管平均剂量(P = 0.142)差异均无统计学意义。结论:FDG-F18 PET-CT是治疗非小细胞肺癌的一种有价值的工具。与CT相比,它在减少对关键器官的辐射剂量方面具有优势,表明在保持有效肿瘤靶向的同时,可以改善对正常组织的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target volume definition of lung cancer between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning.

Background: Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.

Aim: The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.

Methodology: It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.

Results: The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.

Conclusion: FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信