Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain
{"title":"肺癌靶体积在PET-CT和基于ct的剂量计规划中的定义。","authors":"Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"21 3","pages":"547-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target volume definition of lung cancer between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning.\",\"authors\":\"Priya Tawri, Shankar L Jakhar, Guman Singh, Neeti Sharma, H S Kumar, M Athiyaman, A Hemalatha, Rajshekhar Agnivashya, Kanika Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"547-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1448_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Target volume definition of lung cancer between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning.
Background: Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with an incidence and mortality of 12.4% and 18.7%, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) helps in both downstaging T criteria and upstaging disease by detection of distant extrathoracic or nonregional nodal metastases.
Aim: The study is intended to compare target volume definitions between PET-CT and CT-based dosimetric planning for lung carcinoma patients on specific treatment planning parameters like tumor volumes and the number and location of involved nodes.
Methodology: It was a prospective observational study done on 50 histologically proven, non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Two sets of target volumes were contoured independently - one based on the fused PET-CT images and the other based on CT alone.
Results: The gross tumor volume on CT-based contours was 130.84 cc and that with PET was 95.84 cc, with an overall mean reduction of 35 cc on PET-CT as compared to CT, which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.004. A similar trend was seen with clinical target volume with a P value of 0.005. There was no significant difference seen in the normal tissue dose, represented by V20 (P = 0.418), mean lung dose (P = 0.185), and mean esophageal dose (P = 0.142) between PET-CT and CT-derived plans.
Conclusion: FDG-F18 PET-CT is a valuable tool in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation doses to critical organs compared to CT, suggesting improved sparing of normal tissues while maintaining effective tumor targeting.