Mohammad Mousavi, Pari Saeidi, Parisa Kazemi, Vahid Rakhshan
{"title":"固定正畸治疗前后前磨牙拔除对男女牙龈显示指数的影响。","authors":"Mohammad Mousavi, Pari Saeidi, Parisa Kazemi, Vahid Rakhshan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-10233-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fixing a gummy smile is a crucial esthetic treatment. It is unclear if the modality of orthodontic treatment (i.e., premolar extraction versus non-extraction) can affect the extent of gingival show. There is a lack of literature on this topic. Therefore, this retrospective 2-year study was conducted. This retrospective cohort study was performed on 468 observations of 234 patients. Fixed orthodontic treatment of 234 patients was performed using 22-MBT edgewise applications during a period of 1.5 to 2 years. Of these, 117 patients had extraction treatment protocols and 117 had non-extraction ones. Gingival displays of patients were measured on their smile photographs, once before beginning the orthodontic treatment and once after finishing the treatment. The index of gingival display was calculated as the ratio of the gingiva-to-tooth heights. It was calculated by measuring the extent of gingival appearance of each maxillary anterior tooth, averaging these six measurements, and dividing this average appearance by the clinical height of the right maxillary central. These values were analyzed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and paired and unpaired t-tests (α = 0.05, α = 0.025). There were 56 and 59 females in the extraction and non-extraction groups, respectively (chi-square, P = 0.794). In the non-extraction group, Gingival Show Index reduced from 50.2 to 39.7% (P = 0.0000, paired t-test), while in the extraction group, it increased from 20.1 to 26.8% (P = 0.0371, t-test). The repeated-measures two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of treatment modalities (non-extraction group showing greater gingival display, P = 0.000) and sexes (women showing greater gingival displays, P = 0.001) were significant. The interaction of treatment by sex was significant (P = 0.045). The test detected different effects for both treatment, since the interaction of treatment type with the repeated-measures factor 'time' was significant (P = 0.0000). However, the interaction of the repeated-measures factor 'time' with gender was not significant (P = 0.587). The interaction of the factors 'time by treatment by sex' was significant (P = 0.034). Premolar extraction can increase the gingival display index for about 7%, while non-extraction treatment can reduce gingival show ratio for about 11%. Women have a greater percent of gingival display index (both before and after the treatment) compared to men.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228707/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of fixed orthodontic treatment with and without premolar extraction on gingival display index in men and women.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Mousavi, Pari Saeidi, Parisa Kazemi, Vahid Rakhshan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-10233-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fixing a gummy smile is a crucial esthetic treatment. It is unclear if the modality of orthodontic treatment (i.e., premolar extraction versus non-extraction) can affect the extent of gingival show. There is a lack of literature on this topic. Therefore, this retrospective 2-year study was conducted. This retrospective cohort study was performed on 468 observations of 234 patients. Fixed orthodontic treatment of 234 patients was performed using 22-MBT edgewise applications during a period of 1.5 to 2 years. Of these, 117 patients had extraction treatment protocols and 117 had non-extraction ones. Gingival displays of patients were measured on their smile photographs, once before beginning the orthodontic treatment and once after finishing the treatment. The index of gingival display was calculated as the ratio of the gingiva-to-tooth heights. It was calculated by measuring the extent of gingival appearance of each maxillary anterior tooth, averaging these six measurements, and dividing this average appearance by the clinical height of the right maxillary central. These values were analyzed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and paired and unpaired t-tests (α = 0.05, α = 0.025). There were 56 and 59 females in the extraction and non-extraction groups, respectively (chi-square, P = 0.794). In the non-extraction group, Gingival Show Index reduced from 50.2 to 39.7% (P = 0.0000, paired t-test), while in the extraction group, it increased from 20.1 to 26.8% (P = 0.0371, t-test). The repeated-measures two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of treatment modalities (non-extraction group showing greater gingival display, P = 0.000) and sexes (women showing greater gingival displays, P = 0.001) were significant. The interaction of treatment by sex was significant (P = 0.045). The test detected different effects for both treatment, since the interaction of treatment type with the repeated-measures factor 'time' was significant (P = 0.0000). However, the interaction of the repeated-measures factor 'time' with gender was not significant (P = 0.587). The interaction of the factors 'time by treatment by sex' was significant (P = 0.034). Premolar extraction can increase the gingival display index for about 7%, while non-extraction treatment can reduce gingival show ratio for about 11%. Women have a greater percent of gingival display index (both before and after the treatment) compared to men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228707/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10233-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10233-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of fixed orthodontic treatment with and without premolar extraction on gingival display index in men and women.
Fixing a gummy smile is a crucial esthetic treatment. It is unclear if the modality of orthodontic treatment (i.e., premolar extraction versus non-extraction) can affect the extent of gingival show. There is a lack of literature on this topic. Therefore, this retrospective 2-year study was conducted. This retrospective cohort study was performed on 468 observations of 234 patients. Fixed orthodontic treatment of 234 patients was performed using 22-MBT edgewise applications during a period of 1.5 to 2 years. Of these, 117 patients had extraction treatment protocols and 117 had non-extraction ones. Gingival displays of patients were measured on their smile photographs, once before beginning the orthodontic treatment and once after finishing the treatment. The index of gingival display was calculated as the ratio of the gingiva-to-tooth heights. It was calculated by measuring the extent of gingival appearance of each maxillary anterior tooth, averaging these six measurements, and dividing this average appearance by the clinical height of the right maxillary central. These values were analyzed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and paired and unpaired t-tests (α = 0.05, α = 0.025). There were 56 and 59 females in the extraction and non-extraction groups, respectively (chi-square, P = 0.794). In the non-extraction group, Gingival Show Index reduced from 50.2 to 39.7% (P = 0.0000, paired t-test), while in the extraction group, it increased from 20.1 to 26.8% (P = 0.0371, t-test). The repeated-measures two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of treatment modalities (non-extraction group showing greater gingival display, P = 0.000) and sexes (women showing greater gingival displays, P = 0.001) were significant. The interaction of treatment by sex was significant (P = 0.045). The test detected different effects for both treatment, since the interaction of treatment type with the repeated-measures factor 'time' was significant (P = 0.0000). However, the interaction of the repeated-measures factor 'time' with gender was not significant (P = 0.587). The interaction of the factors 'time by treatment by sex' was significant (P = 0.034). Premolar extraction can increase the gingival display index for about 7%, while non-extraction treatment can reduce gingival show ratio for about 11%. Women have a greater percent of gingival display index (both before and after the treatment) compared to men.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.