Austin Henderson, Krista Schaefer, Richard Maclehose, Spero M Manson, Dedra Buchwald
{"title":"美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民中COVID-19检测的障碍:比较患者和提供者的观点。","authors":"Austin Henderson, Krista Schaefer, Richard Maclehose, Spero M Manson, Dedra Buchwald","doi":"10.1177/00333549251341242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>COVID-19 testing is an important strategy to limit the spread of COVID-19 and improve health outcomes. Although health care providers (hereinafter, providers) decide which strategies to implement to improve access to testing, they may not have fully accurate impressions of the barriers faced by patients. We examined patient and provider perspectives on barriers to COVID-19 testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 788 patients and 77 providers working at 5 health care organizations in the United States that served urban American Indian and Alaska Native people from January through May 2021. We asked patients and providers about barriers to COVID-19 testing and possible strategies that could improve access to testing. We compared patient and provider perspectives by using descriptive statistics and logistic regression; percentages were weighted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we observed a high level of congruence among patients and providers regarding perceived efficacy of strategies to increase testing. Difficulty finding transportation to the clinic was the least commonly reported barrier by patients (14%) but was the most frequently cited barrier by providers (73%). The most commonly reported barrier by patients was concern for contracting COVID-19 during an in-person appointment (43%). Two strategies, providing mobile testing units (76%) and offering monetary incentives (57%), were not commonly used but were endorsed by most patients and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, patient and provider perspectives were highly congruent on perceived barriers to and strategies to facilitate COVID-19 testing. Research on barriers to testing for communicable diseases such as COVID-19 should systematically examine perspectives of both patients and providers to identify potentially effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"333549251341242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to COVID-19 Testing Among American Indian and Alaska Native People: Comparing Perspectives of Patients and Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Austin Henderson, Krista Schaefer, Richard Maclehose, Spero M Manson, Dedra Buchwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00333549251341242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>COVID-19 testing is an important strategy to limit the spread of COVID-19 and improve health outcomes. Although health care providers (hereinafter, providers) decide which strategies to implement to improve access to testing, they may not have fully accurate impressions of the barriers faced by patients. We examined patient and provider perspectives on barriers to COVID-19 testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 788 patients and 77 providers working at 5 health care organizations in the United States that served urban American Indian and Alaska Native people from January through May 2021. We asked patients and providers about barriers to COVID-19 testing and possible strategies that could improve access to testing. We compared patient and provider perspectives by using descriptive statistics and logistic regression; percentages were weighted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we observed a high level of congruence among patients and providers regarding perceived efficacy of strategies to increase testing. Difficulty finding transportation to the clinic was the least commonly reported barrier by patients (14%) but was the most frequently cited barrier by providers (73%). The most commonly reported barrier by patients was concern for contracting COVID-19 during an in-person appointment (43%). Two strategies, providing mobile testing units (76%) and offering monetary incentives (57%), were not commonly used but were endorsed by most patients and providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, patient and provider perspectives were highly congruent on perceived barriers to and strategies to facilitate COVID-19 testing. Research on barriers to testing for communicable diseases such as COVID-19 should systematically examine perspectives of both patients and providers to identify potentially effective interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333549251341242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251341242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251341242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers to COVID-19 Testing Among American Indian and Alaska Native People: Comparing Perspectives of Patients and Providers.
Objectives: COVID-19 testing is an important strategy to limit the spread of COVID-19 and improve health outcomes. Although health care providers (hereinafter, providers) decide which strategies to implement to improve access to testing, they may not have fully accurate impressions of the barriers faced by patients. We examined patient and provider perspectives on barriers to COVID-19 testing.
Methods: We surveyed 788 patients and 77 providers working at 5 health care organizations in the United States that served urban American Indian and Alaska Native people from January through May 2021. We asked patients and providers about barriers to COVID-19 testing and possible strategies that could improve access to testing. We compared patient and provider perspectives by using descriptive statistics and logistic regression; percentages were weighted.
Results: Overall, we observed a high level of congruence among patients and providers regarding perceived efficacy of strategies to increase testing. Difficulty finding transportation to the clinic was the least commonly reported barrier by patients (14%) but was the most frequently cited barrier by providers (73%). The most commonly reported barrier by patients was concern for contracting COVID-19 during an in-person appointment (43%). Two strategies, providing mobile testing units (76%) and offering monetary incentives (57%), were not commonly used but were endorsed by most patients and providers.
Conclusions: Overall, patient and provider perspectives were highly congruent on perceived barriers to and strategies to facilitate COVID-19 testing. Research on barriers to testing for communicable diseases such as COVID-19 should systematically examine perspectives of both patients and providers to identify potentially effective interventions.
期刊介绍:
Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health.
The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.