Yan Shen, Hongmin Qin, Xiaosu Liu, Lu Liu, Shuang Chen, Yuqi Yang, Jing Yuan, Yan Zha
{"title":"小腿围预测接受维持性血液透析的老年患者的肌肉减少症和全因死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yan Shen, Hongmin Qin, Xiaosu Liu, Lu Liu, Shuang Chen, Yuqi Yang, Jing Yuan, Yan Zha","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of calf circumference (CC) in predicting sarcopenia and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains debated. This study assessed CC's predictive value, optimal threshold, and mortality association in older patients undergoing MHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted on older adult patients undergoing MHD. Sarcopenia was defined by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to explore the relationship between CC and sarcopenia. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed survival over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 979 older adult patients undergoing MHD treatment, with an average age of 73.4 years, were included in this study. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 61.1%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; P = 0.017) and CC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for sarcopenia through multifactorial logistic regression analysis. ROC curves for CC and sarcopenia indicated that the optimal cutoff value for men was 32.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.904; sensitivity, 0.958; specificity, 0.841), whereas for women, it was 31.9 cm (AUC, 0.884; sensitivity, 0.922; specificity: 0.756). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated lower survival probabilities in patients with sarcopenia and low CC. After adjustment for multiple factors, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients in the sarcopenia group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.411; P = 0.017) and those in the low-CC group (HR = 2.045; P = 0.046) had significantly shorter overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CC is an independent predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in older patients undergoing MHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calf circumference predicts sarcopenia and all-cause mortality in older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: A prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Shen, Hongmin Qin, Xiaosu Liu, Lu Liu, Shuang Chen, Yuqi Yang, Jing Yuan, Yan Zha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.11337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of calf circumference (CC) in predicting sarcopenia and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains debated. This study assessed CC's predictive value, optimal threshold, and mortality association in older patients undergoing MHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted on older adult patients undergoing MHD. Sarcopenia was defined by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to explore the relationship between CC and sarcopenia. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed survival over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 979 older adult patients undergoing MHD treatment, with an average age of 73.4 years, were included in this study. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 61.1%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; P = 0.017) and CC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for sarcopenia through multifactorial logistic regression analysis. ROC curves for CC and sarcopenia indicated that the optimal cutoff value for men was 32.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.904; sensitivity, 0.958; specificity, 0.841), whereas for women, it was 31.9 cm (AUC, 0.884; sensitivity, 0.922; specificity: 0.756). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated lower survival probabilities in patients with sarcopenia and low CC. After adjustment for multiple factors, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients in the sarcopenia group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.411; P = 0.017) and those in the low-CC group (HR = 2.045; P = 0.046) had significantly shorter overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CC is an independent predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in older patients undergoing MHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Calf circumference predicts sarcopenia and all-cause mortality in older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: A prospective cohort study.
Background: The role of calf circumference (CC) in predicting sarcopenia and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains debated. This study assessed CC's predictive value, optimal threshold, and mortality association in older patients undergoing MHD.
Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted on older adult patients undergoing MHD. Sarcopenia was defined by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to explore the relationship between CC and sarcopenia. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed survival over 2 years.
Results: A total of 979 older adult patients undergoing MHD treatment, with an average age of 73.4 years, were included in this study. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 61.1%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; P = 0.017) and CC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for sarcopenia through multifactorial logistic regression analysis. ROC curves for CC and sarcopenia indicated that the optimal cutoff value for men was 32.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.904; sensitivity, 0.958; specificity, 0.841), whereas for women, it was 31.9 cm (AUC, 0.884; sensitivity, 0.922; specificity: 0.756). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated lower survival probabilities in patients with sarcopenia and low CC. After adjustment for multiple factors, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients in the sarcopenia group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.411; P = 0.017) and those in the low-CC group (HR = 2.045; P = 0.046) had significantly shorter overall survival.
Conclusions: CC is an independent predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in older patients undergoing MHD.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).