胎儿作为病人:当代围产期医学的职业责任。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frank A Chervenak, Asim Kurjak, Milan Stajonevic, Joachim Dudenhausen, Amos Grünebaum
{"title":"胎儿作为病人:当代围产期医学的职业责任。","authors":"Frank A Chervenak, Asim Kurjak, Milan Stajonevic, Joachim Dudenhausen, Amos Grünebaum","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2025-0338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of the fetus as a patient has evolved over the past several decades, driven by advances in fetal medicine, neonatology, and bioethics. Pioneering international work by Erich Saling, Ian Donald, William Liley, L. Stanley James, and Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia transformed the fetus from a passive presence into an active subject of medical diagnosis and intervention, laying the groundwork for a dual-patient ethical model in obstetric care. The Society \"The Fetus as a Patient,\" established in the early 1990s, galvanized international collaboration among clinicians and ethicists, promoting the recognition of the fetus as a patient. Since its inception, the <i>Journal of Perinatal Medicine</i> has served as the official and essential publication of the Society for the Fetus as a Patient, disseminating many of its most influential papers. Central to this evolution is the professional responsibility model, which delineates clinicians' ethical obligations to both pregnant and fetal patients, emphasizing evidence-based advocacy and beneficence while respecting maternal autonomy. The model defines the fetus as a patient when the pregnant woman seeks care and when interventions can reasonably benefit the fetus, with viability as an inflection point serving as a key ethical threshold. Technological advances in the 21st century, such as fetal surgery and gene therapy, have further advanced the ethical landscape, necessitating nuanced, preventive ethics and transparent communication. The 2009 and 2024 International Academy of Perinatal Medicine New York declarations have reinforced the global commitment to equitable, ethically sound perinatal care, balancing maternal rights and fetal interests. As maternal-fetal medicine continues to advance, ongoing ethical reflection, institutional support, and interdisciplinary international collaboration remain essential for aligning clinical innovation with professional integrity and justice in perinatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fetus as a patient: professional responsibility in contemporary Perinatal Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Frank A Chervenak, Asim Kurjak, Milan Stajonevic, Joachim Dudenhausen, Amos Grünebaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2025-0338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of the fetus as a patient has evolved over the past several decades, driven by advances in fetal medicine, neonatology, and bioethics. Pioneering international work by Erich Saling, Ian Donald, William Liley, L. Stanley James, and Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia transformed the fetus from a passive presence into an active subject of medical diagnosis and intervention, laying the groundwork for a dual-patient ethical model in obstetric care. The Society \\\"The Fetus as a Patient,\\\" established in the early 1990s, galvanized international collaboration among clinicians and ethicists, promoting the recognition of the fetus as a patient. Since its inception, the <i>Journal of Perinatal Medicine</i> has served as the official and essential publication of the Society for the Fetus as a Patient, disseminating many of its most influential papers. Central to this evolution is the professional responsibility model, which delineates clinicians' ethical obligations to both pregnant and fetal patients, emphasizing evidence-based advocacy and beneficence while respecting maternal autonomy. The model defines the fetus as a patient when the pregnant woman seeks care and when interventions can reasonably benefit the fetus, with viability as an inflection point serving as a key ethical threshold. Technological advances in the 21st century, such as fetal surgery and gene therapy, have further advanced the ethical landscape, necessitating nuanced, preventive ethics and transparent communication. The 2009 and 2024 International Academy of Perinatal Medicine New York declarations have reinforced the global commitment to equitable, ethically sound perinatal care, balancing maternal rights and fetal interests. As maternal-fetal medicine continues to advance, ongoing ethical reflection, institutional support, and interdisciplinary international collaboration remain essential for aligning clinical innovation with professional integrity and justice in perinatal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,胎儿作为病人的概念在胎儿医学、新生儿学和生物伦理学的进步的推动下不断发展。Erich Saling, Ian Donald, William Liley, L. Stanley James和Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia的开创性国际工作将胎儿从被动存在转变为医学诊断和干预的主动主体,为产科护理中的双患者伦理模式奠定了基础。“胎儿作为患者”协会成立于20世纪90年代初,它激发了临床医生和伦理学家之间的国际合作,促进了对胎儿作为患者的认识。自创刊以来,《围产期医学杂志》一直是胎儿患者协会的官方和基本出版物,传播了该协会许多最有影响力的论文。这一演变的核心是职业责任模式,它描述了临床医生对孕妇和胎儿患者的道德义务,强调基于证据的倡导和慈善,同时尊重母亲的自主权。该模型将孕妇寻求护理以及干预措施对胎儿合理有利时的胎儿定义为患者,并将生存能力作为一个拐点,作为关键的伦理门槛。21世纪的技术进步,如胎儿手术和基因治疗,进一步推动了伦理景观,需要细致入微的预防性伦理和透明的沟通。2009年和2024年《国际围产期医学学会纽约宣言》加强了对公平、合乎伦理的围产期护理、平衡孕产妇权利和胎儿利益的全球承诺。随着母胎医学的不断发展,持续的伦理反思、机构支持和跨学科的国际合作对于使临床创新与围产期护理的专业诚信和公正保持一致至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fetus as a patient: professional responsibility in contemporary Perinatal Medicine.

The concept of the fetus as a patient has evolved over the past several decades, driven by advances in fetal medicine, neonatology, and bioethics. Pioneering international work by Erich Saling, Ian Donald, William Liley, L. Stanley James, and Roberto Caldeyro-Barcia transformed the fetus from a passive presence into an active subject of medical diagnosis and intervention, laying the groundwork for a dual-patient ethical model in obstetric care. The Society "The Fetus as a Patient," established in the early 1990s, galvanized international collaboration among clinicians and ethicists, promoting the recognition of the fetus as a patient. Since its inception, the Journal of Perinatal Medicine has served as the official and essential publication of the Society for the Fetus as a Patient, disseminating many of its most influential papers. Central to this evolution is the professional responsibility model, which delineates clinicians' ethical obligations to both pregnant and fetal patients, emphasizing evidence-based advocacy and beneficence while respecting maternal autonomy. The model defines the fetus as a patient when the pregnant woman seeks care and when interventions can reasonably benefit the fetus, with viability as an inflection point serving as a key ethical threshold. Technological advances in the 21st century, such as fetal surgery and gene therapy, have further advanced the ethical landscape, necessitating nuanced, preventive ethics and transparent communication. The 2009 and 2024 International Academy of Perinatal Medicine New York declarations have reinforced the global commitment to equitable, ethically sound perinatal care, balancing maternal rights and fetal interests. As maternal-fetal medicine continues to advance, ongoing ethical reflection, institutional support, and interdisciplinary international collaboration remain essential for aligning clinical innovation with professional integrity and justice in perinatal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信