理解认知-运动双任务表现中的年龄相关干扰:一种新方法。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Béraud-Peigné Néva, Perrot Alexandra, Maquestiaux François, Maillot Pauline
{"title":"理解认知-运动双任务表现中的年龄相关干扰:一种新方法。","authors":"Béraud-Peigné Néva, Perrot Alexandra, Maquestiaux François, Maillot Pauline","doi":"10.1080/0361073X.2025.2528580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cognitive tasks in dual-task (DT) tests can be either driven mainly by the environmental demands (an\" environment-driven\" mode of control) or guided mainly by the individual (a \"self-generated\" mode of control). Two new DT tests were conducted to determine the effect of cognitive task types (self-generated vs. environment-driven) on cognitive and motor interference in DT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory study was conducted with 17 older adults (OLD) and 15 adults (YOUNG) who completed three single-task (ST) tests - motor, cognitive environment-driven, cognitive self-generated - and 2 DT tests. Cognitive and motor DT Effect (DTE) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-generated DTE was greater in the motor task than in cognitive tasks, especially for the OLD group. There was no difference for the environment-driven DTE. In the motor task, the self-generated task created more interference than the environment-driven task for all groups, but this was not the case for the cognitive task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some ideas were devised for creating interference-efficient tests, like using cognitive self-generated and motor complex tasks. The study confirmed previous results on gait tasks with new information on motor complex tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12240,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Aging Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Age-Related Interference in Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Performance: A Novel Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Béraud-Peigné Néva, Perrot Alexandra, Maquestiaux François, Maillot Pauline\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0361073X.2025.2528580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cognitive tasks in dual-task (DT) tests can be either driven mainly by the environmental demands (an\\\" environment-driven\\\" mode of control) or guided mainly by the individual (a \\\"self-generated\\\" mode of control). Two new DT tests were conducted to determine the effect of cognitive task types (self-generated vs. environment-driven) on cognitive and motor interference in DT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory study was conducted with 17 older adults (OLD) and 15 adults (YOUNG) who completed three single-task (ST) tests - motor, cognitive environment-driven, cognitive self-generated - and 2 DT tests. Cognitive and motor DT Effect (DTE) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-generated DTE was greater in the motor task than in cognitive tasks, especially for the OLD group. There was no difference for the environment-driven DTE. In the motor task, the self-generated task created more interference than the environment-driven task for all groups, but this was not the case for the cognitive task.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some ideas were devised for creating interference-efficient tests, like using cognitive self-generated and motor complex tasks. The study confirmed previous results on gait tasks with new information on motor complex tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Aging Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Aging Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2025.2528580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2025.2528580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双任务测试中的认知任务可以主要由环境需求驱动(一种“环境驱动”的控制模式),也可以主要由个人引导(一种“自我产生”的控制模式)。为了确定认知任务类型(自我生成与环境驱动)对认知和运动干扰的影响,我们进行了两个新的DT测试。方法:对17名老年人(OLD)和15名成年人(YOUNG)进行了一项探索性研究,他们完成了3项单任务(ST)测试——运动测试、认知环境驱动测试、认知自我生成测试和2项DT测试。计算认知和运动DT效应(DTE)。结果:在运动任务中自我产生的DTE大于认知任务,特别是在OLD组。对于环境驱动的DTE,没有差异。在运动任务中,自发任务比环境驱动任务产生更多的干扰,但在认知任务中并非如此。结论:设计了一些想法来创建干扰有效的测试,如使用认知自我生成和运动复杂任务。这项研究证实了先前关于步态任务的结果,并提供了关于运动复杂任务的新信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Age-Related Interference in Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task Performance: A Novel Approach.

Objectives: Cognitive tasks in dual-task (DT) tests can be either driven mainly by the environmental demands (an" environment-driven" mode of control) or guided mainly by the individual (a "self-generated" mode of control). Two new DT tests were conducted to determine the effect of cognitive task types (self-generated vs. environment-driven) on cognitive and motor interference in DT.

Methods: An exploratory study was conducted with 17 older adults (OLD) and 15 adults (YOUNG) who completed three single-task (ST) tests - motor, cognitive environment-driven, cognitive self-generated - and 2 DT tests. Cognitive and motor DT Effect (DTE) were calculated.

Results: The self-generated DTE was greater in the motor task than in cognitive tasks, especially for the OLD group. There was no difference for the environment-driven DTE. In the motor task, the self-generated task created more interference than the environment-driven task for all groups, but this was not the case for the cognitive task.

Conclusions: Some ideas were devised for creating interference-efficient tests, like using cognitive self-generated and motor complex tasks. The study confirmed previous results on gait tasks with new information on motor complex tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Aging Research
Experimental Aging Research 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental Aging Research is a life span developmental and aging journal dealing with research on the aging process from a psychological and psychobiological perspective. It meets the need for a scholarly journal with refereed scientific papers dealing with age differences and age changes at any point in the adult life span. Areas of major focus include experimental psychology, neuropsychology, psychobiology, work research, ergonomics, and behavioral medicine. Original research, book reviews, monographs, and papers covering special topics are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信