来自世界各地自然保护区公平治理评估的见解。

IF 5.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Naira Dehmel, Kate Schreckenberg, Phil Franks, Nikoleta Jones, Francesca Booker, Cosmas Lambini, Ruth Pinto, Alejandra Cely-Gómez, Ishmael Chaukura, Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi, Phanith Chou, Ioli Christopoulou, Retche P Colegado, Juliana Echeverri, Emelda Miyanda Hachoofwe, Kalyan Hou, Corinne Samantha Julie, Reuben Lendira, Rodgers Lubilo, Bertille Mayen, Joyce Nyaruai Mbataru, Teresa Morales, Nguyen Viet Dung, Vincent Oduka Oluoch, Jean-Aimé Razafindra-Paul, Natalie J Robinson, Constance M Schéré, Samwel Shaba, Medard Twinamatsiko
{"title":"来自世界各地自然保护区公平治理评估的见解。","authors":"Naira Dehmel, Kate Schreckenberg, Phil Franks, Nikoleta Jones, Francesca Booker, Cosmas Lambini, Ruth Pinto, Alejandra Cely-Gómez, Ishmael Chaukura, Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi, Phanith Chou, Ioli Christopoulou, Retche P Colegado, Juliana Echeverri, Emelda Miyanda Hachoofwe, Kalyan Hou, Corinne Samantha Julie, Reuben Lendira, Rodgers Lubilo, Bertille Mayen, Joyce Nyaruai Mbataru, Teresa Morales, Nguyen Viet Dung, Vincent Oduka Oluoch, Jean-Aimé Razafindra-Paul, Natalie J Robinson, Constance M Schéré, Samwel Shaba, Medard Twinamatsiko","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors' views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70101"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world.\",\"authors\":\"Naira Dehmel, Kate Schreckenberg, Phil Franks, Nikoleta Jones, Francesca Booker, Cosmas Lambini, Ruth Pinto, Alejandra Cely-Gómez, Ishmael Chaukura, Donald Chilengwe Chikumbi, Phanith Chou, Ioli Christopoulou, Retche P Colegado, Juliana Echeverri, Emelda Miyanda Hachoofwe, Kalyan Hou, Corinne Samantha Julie, Reuben Lendira, Rodgers Lubilo, Bertille Mayen, Joyce Nyaruai Mbataru, Teresa Morales, Nguyen Viet Dung, Vincent Oduka Oluoch, Jean-Aimé Razafindra-Paul, Natalie J Robinson, Constance M Schéré, Samwel Shaba, Medard Twinamatsiko\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.70101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors' views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保保护区和保护区(PCAs)得到公平治理的全球政策承诺增加了对经验性评估和分析社会公平的兴趣。虽然在个别的国别行动方案中进行了许多评估,但对作为场址一级以外的多维概念的公平的经验见解有限。我们调查了与pca治理相关的分配、程序和承认的公平挑战,并确定所识别的挑战是否根据治理类型和参与者群体而有所不同。我们对19个国家的37个PCAs进行的公平治理评估进行了元水平分析,这些评估构成了新的SAGE(治理与公平现场级评估)数据库的一部分。SAGE是一种参与性工具,供现场级行为者系统地讨论和评估其PCAs的公平动态。我们发现不同地点的评估结果差异很大。减轻自然保护对当地社区的负面影响通常被认为是最大的挑战。一般来说,对由土著人民和当地社区管理和与之合作的共同行动纲领的公平评价往往比那些纯粹由政府机构管理的行动纲领的评价稍微积极一些。对不同行为者的评估常常揭示出在具体治理问题上意见的实质性差异。特别是,PCA决策者的评价往往比PCA使用者的评价更积极。作为对不断增长的SAGE数据库的早期探索,我们的发现证明了评估和改进PCA治理的工具从采用多维方法中获得价值,并且需要考虑不同参与者的观点。尽管不断增长的SAGE数据库具有进一步了解如何在治理类型、生态系统和地理区域之间感知公平的潜力,SAGE的主要目标需要保持在站点级别理解和推进公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from equitable governance assessments in conservation areas around the world.

Global policy commitments to ensure that protected and conserved areas (PCAs) are equitably governed have increased interest in empirically assessing and analyzing social equity. Although numerous assessments have been conducted in individual PCAs, there is limited empirical insight into equity as a multidimensional concept beyond the site level. We investigated the distributional, procedural, and recognitional equity challenges associated with the governance of PCAs and determined whether the identified challenges differed according to governance type and actor group. We conducted a meta-level analysis of equitable governance assessments conducted at 37 PCAs in 19 countries that form part of the new SAGE (Site-level Assessment of Governance and Equity) database. SAGE is a participatory tool for site-level actors to systematically discuss and assess equity dynamics at their PCAs. We found a large variation in assessment results across the sites. Mitigating the negative impacts of conservation on local communities was most often identified as the biggest challenge. In general, equity assessments tended to be slightly more positive for PCAs governed by and with Indigenous Peoples and local communities than those governed purely by government agencies. Evaluations of different actors often revealed substantial differences in opinion on specific governance issues. In particular, evaluations of PCA decision-makers tended to be more positive than those of PCA users. As an early-stage exploration of the growing SAGE database, our findings provide proof of concept that tools for assessing and improving PCA governance gain value from taking multidimensional approaches and need to consider different actors' views. Although the growing SAGE database holds potential for further insights on how equity is perceived across governance types, ecosystems, and geographical regions, the primary objective of SAGE needs to remain understanding and advancing equity at the site level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信