导航治疗方案:一项质性研究,探讨澳大利亚妇女的决策经验和对治疗月经大量出血的满意度。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jennifer Ramsay, Matilda Riek, Bec Jenkinson, Tessa Copp, Joan Carlini, Jenny Doust
{"title":"导航治疗方案:一项质性研究,探讨澳大利亚妇女的决策经验和对治疗月经大量出血的满意度。","authors":"Jennifer Ramsay, Matilda Riek, Bec Jenkinson, Tessa Copp, Joan Carlini, Jenny Doust","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03884-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A wide range of management options exist for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Australian clinical standards emphasise the need for shared decision-making to ensure women receive comprehensive, reliable information about their options. However, the high variation in the usage of treatments, such as hysterectomy and endometrial ablation, across Australia suggests inconsistent access to quality care. This study aims to gain insights into Australian women's perceptions of current practices, their experiences of HMB care and treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Australian women who sought treatment for HMB within the past two years. Women were recruited via social media advertising. The interviews took place online between July and September 2024. Women were asked about (1) their experiences with HMB, (2) their interactions with clinicians (3) experiences of shared decision making and (4) what other resources they consulted in their treatment decision-making. Transcribed audio recordings were analysed thematically using Framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four participants between the ages of 35 and 55 were interviewed. Five main themes emerged: \"Why Women Seek Treatment\", \"Efforts and Obstacles in Securing Quality Care\", \"Women's Perceptions of Their Treatment Options\", \"The Role of Clinicians in Treatment Decision-making\" and \"Women consult various sources of information to make treatment decisions\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Australian women face significant barriers in accessing quality care and appropriate effective treatment for HMB. Women are often uncertain about what is considered a normal menstrual experience and receive inadequate information from clinicians. Women seek balanced, comprehensive information on all available treatment options and clear guidance on how treatment success is monitored. Tools that support shared decision-making have been identified as a potential method to improve HMB treatment journeys.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating treatment options: a qualitative study exploring Australian women's decision-making experiences and satisfaction with treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Ramsay, Matilda Riek, Bec Jenkinson, Tessa Copp, Joan Carlini, Jenny Doust\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03884-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A wide range of management options exist for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Australian clinical standards emphasise the need for shared decision-making to ensure women receive comprehensive, reliable information about their options. However, the high variation in the usage of treatments, such as hysterectomy and endometrial ablation, across Australia suggests inconsistent access to quality care. This study aims to gain insights into Australian women's perceptions of current practices, their experiences of HMB care and treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Australian women who sought treatment for HMB within the past two years. Women were recruited via social media advertising. The interviews took place online between July and September 2024. Women were asked about (1) their experiences with HMB, (2) their interactions with clinicians (3) experiences of shared decision making and (4) what other resources they consulted in their treatment decision-making. Transcribed audio recordings were analysed thematically using Framework analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four participants between the ages of 35 and 55 were interviewed. Five main themes emerged: \\\"Why Women Seek Treatment\\\", \\\"Efforts and Obstacles in Securing Quality Care\\\", \\\"Women's Perceptions of Their Treatment Options\\\", \\\"The Role of Clinicians in Treatment Decision-making\\\" and \\\"Women consult various sources of information to make treatment decisions\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Australian women face significant barriers in accessing quality care and appropriate effective treatment for HMB. Women are often uncertain about what is considered a normal menstrual experience and receive inadequate information from clinicians. Women seek balanced, comprehensive information on all available treatment options and clear guidance on how treatment success is monitored. Tools that support shared decision-making have been identified as a potential method to improve HMB treatment journeys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228148/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03884-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03884-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量月经出血(HMB)有多种治疗选择。澳大利亚临床标准强调共同决策的必要性,以确保妇女获得有关其选择的全面、可靠的信息。然而,治疗方法的使用差异很大,如子宫切除术和子宫内膜消融,在澳大利亚各地表明获得高质量护理的机会不一致。本研究旨在深入了解澳大利亚妇女对当前做法的看法,她们在HMB护理和治疗决策方面的经验。方法:采用半结构化访谈对过去两年内寻求HMB治疗的澳大利亚妇女进行定性研究。女性是通过社交媒体广告招募的。这些采访于2024年7月至9月在网上进行。女性被问及以下问题:(1)她们患HMB的经历;(2)她们与临床医生的互动;(3)共同决策的经历;(4)她们在治疗决策时咨询了哪些其他资源。使用框架分析对转录的录音进行主题分析。结果:24名年龄在35岁至55岁之间的参与者接受了访谈。出现了五个主要主题:“妇女为什么寻求治疗”、“确保优质护理的努力和障碍”、“妇女对其治疗选择的看法”、“临床医生在治疗决策中的作用”和“妇女在做出治疗决定时咨询各种信息来源”。结论:澳大利亚妇女在获得高质量护理和适当有效治疗HMB方面面临重大障碍。女性往往不确定什么是正常的月经经历,从临床医生那里得到的信息也不充分。妇女寻求关于所有可用治疗方案的均衡、全面的信息,以及关于如何监测治疗成功的明确指导。支持共同决策的工具已被确定为改善HMB治疗过程的潜在方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating treatment options: a qualitative study exploring Australian women's decision-making experiences and satisfaction with treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Background: A wide range of management options exist for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Australian clinical standards emphasise the need for shared decision-making to ensure women receive comprehensive, reliable information about their options. However, the high variation in the usage of treatments, such as hysterectomy and endometrial ablation, across Australia suggests inconsistent access to quality care. This study aims to gain insights into Australian women's perceptions of current practices, their experiences of HMB care and treatment decision-making.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with Australian women who sought treatment for HMB within the past two years. Women were recruited via social media advertising. The interviews took place online between July and September 2024. Women were asked about (1) their experiences with HMB, (2) their interactions with clinicians (3) experiences of shared decision making and (4) what other resources they consulted in their treatment decision-making. Transcribed audio recordings were analysed thematically using Framework analysis.

Results: Twenty-four participants between the ages of 35 and 55 were interviewed. Five main themes emerged: "Why Women Seek Treatment", "Efforts and Obstacles in Securing Quality Care", "Women's Perceptions of Their Treatment Options", "The Role of Clinicians in Treatment Decision-making" and "Women consult various sources of information to make treatment decisions".

Conclusions: Australian women face significant barriers in accessing quality care and appropriate effective treatment for HMB. Women are often uncertain about what is considered a normal menstrual experience and receive inadequate information from clinicians. Women seek balanced, comprehensive information on all available treatment options and clear guidance on how treatment success is monitored. Tools that support shared decision-making have been identified as a potential method to improve HMB treatment journeys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信