“门静脉-肠系膜静脉切除术-印度多中心”(PRIME)研究:389例病例分析:胰切除术后门静脉-肠系膜静脉切除术的真实证据和预测术后预后的临床nomography的发展。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-05 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17702-1
Deeksha Kapoor, Manish S Bhandare, Agam Sharma, Raja Kalayarasan, Monish Karunakaran, Sree Kumar Balasubramanian, Aishwarya Pal, Nagaraj Palankar, D S Darshanik, Subhash Soni, Sreenivas Reddy Biravely, ArunKumar Namachivayam, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Vaibhav Varshney, Adarsh Chaudhary, Sadiq Sikora, Rajesh Gupta, Sanjay Govil, Pradeep Rebala, Biju Pottakkat, Hariharan Ramesh, Vikram A Chaudhari, Shailesh V Shrikhande
{"title":"“门静脉-肠系膜静脉切除术-印度多中心”(PRIME)研究:389例病例分析:胰切除术后门静脉-肠系膜静脉切除术的真实证据和预测术后预后的临床nomography的发展。","authors":"Deeksha Kapoor, Manish S Bhandare, Agam Sharma, Raja Kalayarasan, Monish Karunakaran, Sree Kumar Balasubramanian, Aishwarya Pal, Nagaraj Palankar, D S Darshanik, Subhash Soni, Sreenivas Reddy Biravely, ArunKumar Namachivayam, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Vaibhav Varshney, Adarsh Chaudhary, Sadiq Sikora, Rajesh Gupta, Sanjay Govil, Pradeep Rebala, Biju Pottakkat, Hariharan Ramesh, Vikram A Chaudhari, Shailesh V Shrikhande","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17702-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With better surgery and chemotherapeutic agents, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatobiliary tumours are being treated with curative intent. This study presents real-world evidence of porto-mesenteric vein resections (PVR) with pancreatectomy and generates predictive nomograms for postoperative mortality (POM) and major complications (MC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre study, including 11 high-volume centres, evaluated patients undergoing PVR. Factors affecting 90-day POM and MC (Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ 3a) were assessed, and predictive nomograms were generated. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Cox regression analysis was performed to ascertain factors affecting OS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 389 patients, POM was 6.4%, and MCs were 32.6%. Charlson comorbidity index > 4, preoperative biliary drainage, preoperative radiotherapy (PRT), segmental PVR, and additional organ resection (AOR) were predictive of POM. The independent predictors of MCs were American Society of Anesthesiologists status 3/4, PRT, and AOR. The generated model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757, cutoff > 1.79 to predict POM, and AUC of 0.669, cutoff > 0.678 for MCs. In the 263 patients with PDAC, the median OS was 25.01 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-28.11), and DFS was 16.72 months (95% CI 14.56-18.89). Perineural invasion, segmental PVR, and margin positivity predicted worse survival, while completing multi-modality treatment was protective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POM and MCs of PVR with pancreatectomy were at par with the world standards. The generated predictive nomograms for POM and MC revealed a good predictive potential. In patients with PDAC, completion of multimodality treatment offers better long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7410-7421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Evidence of Porto-Mesenteric Vein Resections with Pancreatectomy and the Development of Predictive Clinical Nomograms for Postoperative Outcomes-An Analysis of 389 Cases: The \\\"Porto-Mesenteric Vein Resection-Indian MulticentrE\\\" (PRIME) Study.\",\"authors\":\"Deeksha Kapoor, Manish S Bhandare, Agam Sharma, Raja Kalayarasan, Monish Karunakaran, Sree Kumar Balasubramanian, Aishwarya Pal, Nagaraj Palankar, D S Darshanik, Subhash Soni, Sreenivas Reddy Biravely, ArunKumar Namachivayam, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Vaibhav Varshney, Adarsh Chaudhary, Sadiq Sikora, Rajesh Gupta, Sanjay Govil, Pradeep Rebala, Biju Pottakkat, Hariharan Ramesh, Vikram A Chaudhari, Shailesh V Shrikhande\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17702-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With better surgery and chemotherapeutic agents, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatobiliary tumours are being treated with curative intent. This study presents real-world evidence of porto-mesenteric vein resections (PVR) with pancreatectomy and generates predictive nomograms for postoperative mortality (POM) and major complications (MC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre study, including 11 high-volume centres, evaluated patients undergoing PVR. Factors affecting 90-day POM and MC (Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ 3a) were assessed, and predictive nomograms were generated. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Cox regression analysis was performed to ascertain factors affecting OS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 389 patients, POM was 6.4%, and MCs were 32.6%. Charlson comorbidity index > 4, preoperative biliary drainage, preoperative radiotherapy (PRT), segmental PVR, and additional organ resection (AOR) were predictive of POM. The independent predictors of MCs were American Society of Anesthesiologists status 3/4, PRT, and AOR. The generated model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757, cutoff > 1.79 to predict POM, and AUC of 0.669, cutoff > 0.678 for MCs. In the 263 patients with PDAC, the median OS was 25.01 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-28.11), and DFS was 16.72 months (95% CI 14.56-18.89). Perineural invasion, segmental PVR, and margin positivity predicted worse survival, while completing multi-modality treatment was protective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POM and MCs of PVR with pancreatectomy were at par with the world standards. The generated predictive nomograms for POM and MC revealed a good predictive potential. In patients with PDAC, completion of multimodality treatment offers better long-term survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7410-7421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17702-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17702-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着更好的手术和化疗药物,边缘可切除或局部晚期胰胆管肿瘤正在以治愈为目的进行治疗。本研究提供了门静脉-肠系膜静脉切除术(PVR)合并胰腺切除术的真实证据,并生成了术后死亡率(POM)和主要并发症(MC)的预测图。方法:一项回顾性多中心研究,包括11个大容量中心,评估接受PVR的患者。评估影响90天POM和MC (Clavien-Dindo分级≥3a)的因素,并生成预测图。评估胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。Cox回归分析确定影响OS和DFS的因素。结果:389例患者中,POM占6.4%,MCs占32.6%。Charlson合并症指数bbb40、术前胆道引流、术前放疗(PRT)、节段性PVR和附加器官切除(AOR)是预测POM的指标。MCs的独立预测因子为美国麻醉医师协会状态3/4、PRT和AOR。生成的模型预测POM的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.757,cutoff >为1.79,预测MCs的AUC为0.669,cutoff >为0.678。263例PDAC患者中,中位OS为25.01个月(95%可信区间[CI] 21.9 ~ 28.11), DFS为16.72个月(95% CI 14.56 ~ 18.89)。神经周围侵犯、节段性PVR和切缘阳性预示着更差的生存,而完成多模式治疗具有保护作用。结论:PVR合并胰腺切除术后的POM和MCs均达到国际水平。生成的预测图对POM和MC具有较好的预测潜力。在PDAC患者中,完成多模式治疗可提供更好的长期生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Evidence of Porto-Mesenteric Vein Resections with Pancreatectomy and the Development of Predictive Clinical Nomograms for Postoperative Outcomes-An Analysis of 389 Cases: The "Porto-Mesenteric Vein Resection-Indian MulticentrE" (PRIME) Study.

Background: With better surgery and chemotherapeutic agents, borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatobiliary tumours are being treated with curative intent. This study presents real-world evidence of porto-mesenteric vein resections (PVR) with pancreatectomy and generates predictive nomograms for postoperative mortality (POM) and major complications (MC).

Methods: A retrospective multicentre study, including 11 high-volume centres, evaluated patients undergoing PVR. Factors affecting 90-day POM and MC (Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ 3a) were assessed, and predictive nomograms were generated. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Cox regression analysis was performed to ascertain factors affecting OS and DFS.

Results: Among 389 patients, POM was 6.4%, and MCs were 32.6%. Charlson comorbidity index > 4, preoperative biliary drainage, preoperative radiotherapy (PRT), segmental PVR, and additional organ resection (AOR) were predictive of POM. The independent predictors of MCs were American Society of Anesthesiologists status 3/4, PRT, and AOR. The generated model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757, cutoff > 1.79 to predict POM, and AUC of 0.669, cutoff > 0.678 for MCs. In the 263 patients with PDAC, the median OS was 25.01 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9-28.11), and DFS was 16.72 months (95% CI 14.56-18.89). Perineural invasion, segmental PVR, and margin positivity predicted worse survival, while completing multi-modality treatment was protective.

Conclusions: The POM and MCs of PVR with pancreatectomy were at par with the world standards. The generated predictive nomograms for POM and MC revealed a good predictive potential. In patients with PDAC, completion of multimodality treatment offers better long-term survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信