英语课堂的应试教学:一种测量仪器的研制与验证

IF 3.8 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joy Muth, Luisa Grützmacher, Marko Lüftenegger
{"title":"英语课堂的应试教学:一种测量仪器的研制与验证","authors":"Joy Muth, Luisa Grützmacher, Marko Lüftenegger","doi":"10.1177/13621688251351250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades, the assumption that the implementation of standardized tests might cause washback effects on language teaching and learning has become certainty. Researchers and practitioners report an increased use of ‘teaching to the test’ (TTT) practices, however, in current literature, consensus about which practices this includes is missing and operationalizations in studies vary greatly. Further, even though TTT is assumed to impair meaningful learning, no study so far examined students’ perspective. The current study therefore used a multi-method approach to theoretically and empirically define TTT and develop a uniform measurement instrument, focusing on students’ perspective of their English language teachers’ practices. Results suggest that TTT is a multidimensional construct consisting merely of test preparation practices, but not changes in teaching style. Multilevel analyses showed adequate fit for two equally plausible models, good psychometric properties, and full measurement invariance of the instrument across gender, first language, and school type. The theory-based and empirically supported instrument therefore represents a valid and reliable measure for uniformly assessing perceived TTT in the language learning context. Our study paves the way for future research studying the effects that this specific type of washback might have on students’ learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching to the test in the English language classroom: Development and validation of a measurement instrument\",\"authors\":\"Joy Muth, Luisa Grützmacher, Marko Lüftenegger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13621688251351250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last few decades, the assumption that the implementation of standardized tests might cause washback effects on language teaching and learning has become certainty. Researchers and practitioners report an increased use of ‘teaching to the test’ (TTT) practices, however, in current literature, consensus about which practices this includes is missing and operationalizations in studies vary greatly. Further, even though TTT is assumed to impair meaningful learning, no study so far examined students’ perspective. The current study therefore used a multi-method approach to theoretically and empirically define TTT and develop a uniform measurement instrument, focusing on students’ perspective of their English language teachers’ practices. Results suggest that TTT is a multidimensional construct consisting merely of test preparation practices, but not changes in teaching style. Multilevel analyses showed adequate fit for two equally plausible models, good psychometric properties, and full measurement invariance of the instrument across gender, first language, and school type. The theory-based and empirically supported instrument therefore represents a valid and reliable measure for uniformly assessing perceived TTT in the language learning context. Our study paves the way for future research studying the effects that this specific type of washback might have on students’ learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Teaching Research\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Teaching Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251351250\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251351250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,标准化考试的实施可能会对语言教学和学习产生反拨效应的假设已经成为必然。研究人员和从业人员报告说,“应试教学”(TTT)实践的使用越来越多,然而,在目前的文献中,对于包括哪些实践缺乏共识,研究中的可操作性差异很大。此外,尽管TTT被认为会损害有意义的学习,但迄今为止还没有研究考察过学生的观点。因此,本研究采用多方法从理论上和实证上定义TTT,并开发统一的测量工具,重点关注学生对英语教师实践的看法。结果表明,TTT是一个多维结构,仅包括考试准备实践,而不是教学风格的变化。多水平分析表明,两个同样可信的模型具有足够的拟合性,具有良好的心理测量特性,并且该工具在性别、第一语言和学校类型之间具有完全的测量不变性。因此,基于理论和经验支持的工具代表了统一评估语言学习环境中感知的TTT的有效和可靠的措施。我们的研究为未来的研究铺平了道路,研究这种特殊类型的反冲可能对学生的学习成果产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching to the test in the English language classroom: Development and validation of a measurement instrument
In the last few decades, the assumption that the implementation of standardized tests might cause washback effects on language teaching and learning has become certainty. Researchers and practitioners report an increased use of ‘teaching to the test’ (TTT) practices, however, in current literature, consensus about which practices this includes is missing and operationalizations in studies vary greatly. Further, even though TTT is assumed to impair meaningful learning, no study so far examined students’ perspective. The current study therefore used a multi-method approach to theoretically and empirically define TTT and develop a uniform measurement instrument, focusing on students’ perspective of their English language teachers’ practices. Results suggest that TTT is a multidimensional construct consisting merely of test preparation practices, but not changes in teaching style. Multilevel analyses showed adequate fit for two equally plausible models, good psychometric properties, and full measurement invariance of the instrument across gender, first language, and school type. The theory-based and empirically supported instrument therefore represents a valid and reliable measure for uniformly assessing perceived TTT in the language learning context. Our study paves the way for future research studying the effects that this specific type of washback might have on students’ learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信