Wayne J. Stephenson, Mark E. Dickson, Martin D. Hurst, Jokotola Omidiji, Sophie L. Horton, Nicola J. Litchfield, Kevin P. Norton, Hironori Matsumoto, Raphael L. Krier-Mariani, Lovleen Acharya-Chowdhury, Aidan D. McLean
{"title":"全新世同震海相台地序列是完整的古地震记录吗?2016年7.8级Kaikōura地震期间形成的新海洋阶地的快速侵蚀表明并非如此!","authors":"Wayne J. Stephenson, Mark E. Dickson, Martin D. Hurst, Jokotola Omidiji, Sophie L. Horton, Nicola J. Litchfield, Kevin P. Norton, Hironori Matsumoto, Raphael L. Krier-Mariani, Lovleen Acharya-Chowdhury, Aidan D. McLean","doi":"10.1130/g53244.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Holocene coseismic marine terraces are used to reconstruct earthquake magnitude and frequency; however, coastal erosion can remove these terraces, compromising their reliability as paleoseismic records. Rates of terrace removal globally are unconstrained, and the extent to which flights of Holocene coseismic marine terraces contain complete paleoseismic records is unclear. On 14 November 2016, the magnitude (Mw) 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake in New Zealand caused instantaneous uplift of 0.8−1.0 m of intertidal shore platforms, creating a new marine terrace. Since 1974, a micro-erosion meter network has been used to determine erosion rates of these shore platforms, providing a unique opportunity to investigate how quickly a new marine terrace is destroyed. Lowering rates more than doubled from 0.944 mm/yr prior to 2016 to 2.556 mm/yr following uplift. Using a linear decay function starting at 2.556 mm/yr the new marine terrace will be removed from the landscape in 552 yr. When sea-level rise and interseismic subsidence are considered, the terrace may be removed in only 200 yr. A time window of ∼200−550 yr is less than the return time of the earthquake that created the terrace, demonstrating that a new terrace can be eroded from the landscape before further uplift ensures preservation. Our findings clarify how Holocene coseismic terrace sequences present incomplete records of paleoseismicity, with significant implications for reconstructing earthquake magnitude and frequency on tectonically active coasts.","PeriodicalId":12642,"journal":{"name":"Geology","volume":"676 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Holocene coseismic marine terrace sequences complete paleoseismic records? Rapid erosion of a new marine terrace created during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake suggests not!\",\"authors\":\"Wayne J. Stephenson, Mark E. Dickson, Martin D. Hurst, Jokotola Omidiji, Sophie L. Horton, Nicola J. Litchfield, Kevin P. Norton, Hironori Matsumoto, Raphael L. Krier-Mariani, Lovleen Acharya-Chowdhury, Aidan D. McLean\",\"doi\":\"10.1130/g53244.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Holocene coseismic marine terraces are used to reconstruct earthquake magnitude and frequency; however, coastal erosion can remove these terraces, compromising their reliability as paleoseismic records. Rates of terrace removal globally are unconstrained, and the extent to which flights of Holocene coseismic marine terraces contain complete paleoseismic records is unclear. On 14 November 2016, the magnitude (Mw) 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake in New Zealand caused instantaneous uplift of 0.8−1.0 m of intertidal shore platforms, creating a new marine terrace. Since 1974, a micro-erosion meter network has been used to determine erosion rates of these shore platforms, providing a unique opportunity to investigate how quickly a new marine terrace is destroyed. Lowering rates more than doubled from 0.944 mm/yr prior to 2016 to 2.556 mm/yr following uplift. Using a linear decay function starting at 2.556 mm/yr the new marine terrace will be removed from the landscape in 552 yr. When sea-level rise and interseismic subsidence are considered, the terrace may be removed in only 200 yr. A time window of ∼200−550 yr is less than the return time of the earthquake that created the terrace, demonstrating that a new terrace can be eroded from the landscape before further uplift ensures preservation. Our findings clarify how Holocene coseismic terrace sequences present incomplete records of paleoseismicity, with significant implications for reconstructing earthquake magnitude and frequency on tectonically active coasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geology\",\"volume\":\"676 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1130/g53244.1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/g53244.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are Holocene coseismic marine terrace sequences complete paleoseismic records? Rapid erosion of a new marine terrace created during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake suggests not!
Holocene coseismic marine terraces are used to reconstruct earthquake magnitude and frequency; however, coastal erosion can remove these terraces, compromising their reliability as paleoseismic records. Rates of terrace removal globally are unconstrained, and the extent to which flights of Holocene coseismic marine terraces contain complete paleoseismic records is unclear. On 14 November 2016, the magnitude (Mw) 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake in New Zealand caused instantaneous uplift of 0.8−1.0 m of intertidal shore platforms, creating a new marine terrace. Since 1974, a micro-erosion meter network has been used to determine erosion rates of these shore platforms, providing a unique opportunity to investigate how quickly a new marine terrace is destroyed. Lowering rates more than doubled from 0.944 mm/yr prior to 2016 to 2.556 mm/yr following uplift. Using a linear decay function starting at 2.556 mm/yr the new marine terrace will be removed from the landscape in 552 yr. When sea-level rise and interseismic subsidence are considered, the terrace may be removed in only 200 yr. A time window of ∼200−550 yr is less than the return time of the earthquake that created the terrace, demonstrating that a new terrace can be eroded from the landscape before further uplift ensures preservation. Our findings clarify how Holocene coseismic terrace sequences present incomplete records of paleoseismicity, with significant implications for reconstructing earthquake magnitude and frequency on tectonically active coasts.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1973, Geology features rapid publication of about 23 refereed short (four-page) papers each month. Articles cover all earth-science disciplines and include new investigations and provocative topics. Professional geologists and university-level students in the earth sciences use this widely read journal to keep up with scientific research trends. The online forum section facilitates author-reader dialog. Includes color and occasional large-format illustrations on oversized loose inserts.