{"title":"使用机器学习进行人格评估的心理测量特性","authors":"Antonis Koutsoumpis","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technological advancements have enabled personality psychologists to move beyond traditional questionnaire-based assessment toward machine learning-based personality assessment (ML-PA). This manuscript provides a non-systematic overview of the validity and reliability of ML-PA, where behavioral features (e.g., text, voice, digital footprints) serve as predictors of personality traits. ML-PA shows promising construct validity, particularly for observer reports, and ML-PA values are similarly correlated with external variables as questionnaire-based values. However, reliability indices, especially for self-report-based ML-PAs, have been found to be lower. Factors such as sample size, input data quantity, and trait activation significantly impact ML-PA accuracy. Algorithmic bias might pose a threat to ML-PA, and there is a trade-off between applying bias mitigation techniques and maximizing ML-PA performance. Future advancements, including the use of large language models and a focus on explainability, are expected to further enhance personality measurement using computational methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102093"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of personality assessment using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Antonis Koutsoumpis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Technological advancements have enabled personality psychologists to move beyond traditional questionnaire-based assessment toward machine learning-based personality assessment (ML-PA). This manuscript provides a non-systematic overview of the validity and reliability of ML-PA, where behavioral features (e.g., text, voice, digital footprints) serve as predictors of personality traits. ML-PA shows promising construct validity, particularly for observer reports, and ML-PA values are similarly correlated with external variables as questionnaire-based values. However, reliability indices, especially for self-report-based ML-PAs, have been found to be lower. Factors such as sample size, input data quantity, and trait activation significantly impact ML-PA accuracy. Algorithmic bias might pose a threat to ML-PA, and there is a trade-off between applying bias mitigation techniques and maximizing ML-PA performance. Future advancements, including the use of large language models and a focus on explainability, are expected to further enhance personality measurement using computational methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2500106X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2500106X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric properties of personality assessment using machine learning
Technological advancements have enabled personality psychologists to move beyond traditional questionnaire-based assessment toward machine learning-based personality assessment (ML-PA). This manuscript provides a non-systematic overview of the validity and reliability of ML-PA, where behavioral features (e.g., text, voice, digital footprints) serve as predictors of personality traits. ML-PA shows promising construct validity, particularly for observer reports, and ML-PA values are similarly correlated with external variables as questionnaire-based values. However, reliability indices, especially for self-report-based ML-PAs, have been found to be lower. Factors such as sample size, input data quantity, and trait activation significantly impact ML-PA accuracy. Algorithmic bias might pose a threat to ML-PA, and there is a trade-off between applying bias mitigation techniques and maximizing ML-PA performance. Future advancements, including the use of large language models and a focus on explainability, are expected to further enhance personality measurement using computational methods.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology