处理速度训练是否能改善创伤性脑损伤患者的日常生活功能活动:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Yael Goverover, Silvana L Costa, John DeLuca, Nancy Chiaravalloti
{"title":"处理速度训练是否能改善创伤性脑损伤患者的日常生活功能活动:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Yael Goverover, Silvana L Costa, John DeLuca, Nancy Chiaravalloti","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2526663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated Speed of Processing Training (SOPT) efficacy for improving everyday functioning in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thirty-four participants with moderate to severe TBI completed either SOPT or placebo control treatment across 10 sessions over five weeks. Assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up measured Timed Activities of Daily Living (TIADL) performance along with self-reported quality of life, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms. Results revealed no significant differences between the SOPT and placebo groups. Repeated measures ANOVA showed non-significant interactions between time and group for both TIADL scores and self-reported outcomes. Additional post-hoc analyses found no significant differences in baseline variables between participants who improved on the TIADL and those who did not. Despite SOPT's established benefits for processing speed, this study suggests its effects may not transfer to functional outcomes in individuals with moderate to severe TBI. The findings indicate that future research should explore integrated cognitive rehabilitation approaches that better promote generalization to daily life activities and meaningful functional improvements for persons with TBI. The clinical trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (protocol ID: NCT02020564).<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02020564..</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does speed of processing training improve everyday life functional activity in traumatic brain injury: A pilot randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yael Goverover, Silvana L Costa, John DeLuca, Nancy Chiaravalloti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2025.2526663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated Speed of Processing Training (SOPT) efficacy for improving everyday functioning in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thirty-four participants with moderate to severe TBI completed either SOPT or placebo control treatment across 10 sessions over five weeks. Assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up measured Timed Activities of Daily Living (TIADL) performance along with self-reported quality of life, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms. Results revealed no significant differences between the SOPT and placebo groups. Repeated measures ANOVA showed non-significant interactions between time and group for both TIADL scores and self-reported outcomes. Additional post-hoc analyses found no significant differences in baseline variables between participants who improved on the TIADL and those who did not. Despite SOPT's established benefits for processing speed, this study suggests its effects may not transfer to functional outcomes in individuals with moderate to severe TBI. The findings indicate that future research should explore integrated cognitive rehabilitation approaches that better promote generalization to daily life activities and meaningful functional improvements for persons with TBI. The clinical trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (protocol ID: NCT02020564).<b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02020564..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2526663\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2526663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验评估了处理速度训练(SOPT)对改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者日常功能的疗效。34名中度至重度TBI患者完成了为期5周的10次SOPT或安慰剂对照治疗。基线、治疗后和6个月随访时的评估测量了日常生活时间活动(TIADL)表现以及自我报告的生活质量、自我效能和抑郁症状。结果显示,在SOPT组和安慰剂组之间没有显著差异。重复测量方差分析显示TIADL得分和自我报告结果在时间和组之间无显著相互作用。额外的事后分析发现,在TIADL改善的参与者和没有改善的参与者之间,基线变量没有显著差异。尽管SOPT对处理速度有既定的好处,但这项研究表明,它的影响可能不会转移到中度至重度TBI患者的功能结果。研究结果表明,未来的研究应探索综合认知康复方法,以更好地促进TBI患者日常生活活动的推广和有意义的功能改善。该临床试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册(方案ID: NCT02020564)。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02020564。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does speed of processing training improve everyday life functional activity in traumatic brain injury: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated Speed of Processing Training (SOPT) efficacy for improving everyday functioning in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thirty-four participants with moderate to severe TBI completed either SOPT or placebo control treatment across 10 sessions over five weeks. Assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up measured Timed Activities of Daily Living (TIADL) performance along with self-reported quality of life, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms. Results revealed no significant differences between the SOPT and placebo groups. Repeated measures ANOVA showed non-significant interactions between time and group for both TIADL scores and self-reported outcomes. Additional post-hoc analyses found no significant differences in baseline variables between participants who improved on the TIADL and those who did not. Despite SOPT's established benefits for processing speed, this study suggests its effects may not transfer to functional outcomes in individuals with moderate to severe TBI. The findings indicate that future research should explore integrated cognitive rehabilitation approaches that better promote generalization to daily life activities and meaningful functional improvements for persons with TBI. The clinical trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (protocol ID: NCT02020564).Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02020564..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信