{"title":"药学专业学生合理用药素养评价及其影响因素","authors":"Pongpan Suriyong , Titinun Auamnoy , Poonpong Suksawang , Penkarn Kanjanarat , Thawari Khansamrong , Krittayot Supakanjanakanti , Natthaporn Wedvimonrattana , Siwakorn Nobnop","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Irrational drug use remains a global health concern, underscoring the urgent need for a well-prepared health care workforce. Pharmacy students play a vital role in promoting rational drug use literacy (RDUL) to enhance medication safety. This study assessed RDUL among Thai pharmacy students and examined influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Doctorate of Pharmacy Students at Burapha University between January and March 2024, using cluster sampling and the Thai version of RDUL measurement tool for Thai people. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, <em>t</em> tests, χ<sup>2</sup> tests, analysis of variance, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 273 pharmacy students from year 1 to 5 (74.4% female), the mean RDUL score was 44.6 (85.8% of the total), exceeding the general Thai population. However, 19.0% had low RDUL. Academic year, medication use experience, and gender significantly influenced RDUL. Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference analysis showed higher RDUL scores in upper-year students. Multiple regression revealed a significant positive association between the rational drug use learning environment and RDUL. Structural equation modeling confirmed its direct impact (λ = 0.30), with dynamic interactions among 6 RDUL dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pharmacy students demonstrated higher RDUL than the general population. Academic year, medication experience, and gender were the influencing factors, while the rational drug use learning environment was found to have a direct impact on student’s RDUL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 8","pages":"Article 101456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Rational Drug Use Literacy and Its Influencing Factors Among Pharmacy Students\",\"authors\":\"Pongpan Suriyong , Titinun Auamnoy , Poonpong Suksawang , Penkarn Kanjanarat , Thawari Khansamrong , Krittayot Supakanjanakanti , Natthaporn Wedvimonrattana , Siwakorn Nobnop\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Irrational drug use remains a global health concern, underscoring the urgent need for a well-prepared health care workforce. Pharmacy students play a vital role in promoting rational drug use literacy (RDUL) to enhance medication safety. This study assessed RDUL among Thai pharmacy students and examined influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Doctorate of Pharmacy Students at Burapha University between January and March 2024, using cluster sampling and the Thai version of RDUL measurement tool for Thai people. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, <em>t</em> tests, χ<sup>2</sup> tests, analysis of variance, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 273 pharmacy students from year 1 to 5 (74.4% female), the mean RDUL score was 44.6 (85.8% of the total), exceeding the general Thai population. However, 19.0% had low RDUL. Academic year, medication use experience, and gender significantly influenced RDUL. Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference analysis showed higher RDUL scores in upper-year students. Multiple regression revealed a significant positive association between the rational drug use learning environment and RDUL. Structural equation modeling confirmed its direct impact (λ = 0.30), with dynamic interactions among 6 RDUL dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pharmacy students demonstrated higher RDUL than the general population. Academic year, medication experience, and gender were the influencing factors, while the rational drug use learning environment was found to have a direct impact on student’s RDUL.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 101456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Rational Drug Use Literacy and Its Influencing Factors Among Pharmacy Students
Objective
Irrational drug use remains a global health concern, underscoring the urgent need for a well-prepared health care workforce. Pharmacy students play a vital role in promoting rational drug use literacy (RDUL) to enhance medication safety. This study assessed RDUL among Thai pharmacy students and examined influencing factors.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among Doctorate of Pharmacy Students at Burapha University between January and March 2024, using cluster sampling and the Thai version of RDUL measurement tool for Thai people. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t tests, χ2 tests, analysis of variance, multiple regression, and structural equation modeling.
Results
Among 273 pharmacy students from year 1 to 5 (74.4% female), the mean RDUL score was 44.6 (85.8% of the total), exceeding the general Thai population. However, 19.0% had low RDUL. Academic year, medication use experience, and gender significantly influenced RDUL. Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference analysis showed higher RDUL scores in upper-year students. Multiple regression revealed a significant positive association between the rational drug use learning environment and RDUL. Structural equation modeling confirmed its direct impact (λ = 0.30), with dynamic interactions among 6 RDUL dimensions.
Conclusion
Pharmacy students demonstrated higher RDUL than the general population. Academic year, medication experience, and gender were the influencing factors, while the rational drug use learning environment was found to have a direct impact on student’s RDUL.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.