影响澳大利亚农村提供指南推荐的疼痛护理的因素:来自现实主义需求评估的综合方案理论。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ashley R. Grant MCogBehavTherapy , Amelia Mardon PhD , Gill Westhorp PhD , Emma L. Karran PhD , Peter D. Hibbert PhD , Tanushka Alva MClinPhys , Christopher Roeger MD , G. Lorimer Moseley PhD
{"title":"影响澳大利亚农村提供指南推荐的疼痛护理的因素:来自现实主义需求评估的综合方案理论。","authors":"Ashley R. Grant MCogBehavTherapy ,&nbsp;Amelia Mardon PhD ,&nbsp;Gill Westhorp PhD ,&nbsp;Emma L. Karran PhD ,&nbsp;Peter D. Hibbert PhD ,&nbsp;Tanushka Alva MClinPhys ,&nbsp;Christopher Roeger MD ,&nbsp;G. Lorimer Moseley PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Little research has investigated what factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of guideline-recommended pain care. The authorship team developed a realist approach to conducting a needs assessment to investigate such factors. A realist program theory was refined and consolidated through realist-informed interviews and in-person and online focus groups with rural Australian healthcare providers who support patients affected by chronic pain. Data were extracted and retroductively analysed iteratively between rounds of data collection. Formal theories of behaviour were referenced to interpret the findings. Thirty-four providers participated. It was uncovered that providers’ intentions to provide guideline-recommended pain care arise from the combined influence of factors internal to providers including providers’ perceived control to overcome barriers (e.g., knowledge, skills), perceptions regarding the risk of patient attrition, and level of motivation to comply with local guideline-divergent norms. Whether these intentions lead to provision of recommended pain care or not relates to factors external to providers regarding opportunities allotted by models of care that support the providers’ patients, with public models having more constraints than private and compensable models. Further, rural healthcare providers were found to consistently encounter challenges under time pressures caused by short appointment times and busy practice schedules that could trigger ‘fast practice habits’ to override providers’ positive intentions. These findings suggest that aligning community norms with guideline-recommendations, improving models of care that constrain providers’ care, and reducing time pressures, may be worthwhile targets for initiatives that aim to improve the provision of guideline-recommended pain care in rural Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Internal (e.g., knowledge, perceptions, motivations, habits) and external (e.g., models of care, appointment times) factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of recommended pain care. Provision of recommended pain care in rural settings can be facilitated by improving community norms, models of care, and reducing time pressures on providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 105488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting the provision of guideline-recommended pain care in rural Australia: A consolidated program theory from a realist needs assessment\",\"authors\":\"Ashley R. Grant MCogBehavTherapy ,&nbsp;Amelia Mardon PhD ,&nbsp;Gill Westhorp PhD ,&nbsp;Emma L. Karran PhD ,&nbsp;Peter D. Hibbert PhD ,&nbsp;Tanushka Alva MClinPhys ,&nbsp;Christopher Roeger MD ,&nbsp;G. Lorimer Moseley PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Little research has investigated what factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of guideline-recommended pain care. The authorship team developed a realist approach to conducting a needs assessment to investigate such factors. A realist program theory was refined and consolidated through realist-informed interviews and in-person and online focus groups with rural Australian healthcare providers who support patients affected by chronic pain. Data were extracted and retroductively analysed iteratively between rounds of data collection. Formal theories of behaviour were referenced to interpret the findings. Thirty-four providers participated. It was uncovered that providers’ intentions to provide guideline-recommended pain care arise from the combined influence of factors internal to providers including providers’ perceived control to overcome barriers (e.g., knowledge, skills), perceptions regarding the risk of patient attrition, and level of motivation to comply with local guideline-divergent norms. Whether these intentions lead to provision of recommended pain care or not relates to factors external to providers regarding opportunities allotted by models of care that support the providers’ patients, with public models having more constraints than private and compensable models. Further, rural healthcare providers were found to consistently encounter challenges under time pressures caused by short appointment times and busy practice schedules that could trigger ‘fast practice habits’ to override providers’ positive intentions. These findings suggest that aligning community norms with guideline-recommendations, improving models of care that constrain providers’ care, and reducing time pressures, may be worthwhile targets for initiatives that aim to improve the provision of guideline-recommended pain care in rural Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Internal (e.g., knowledge, perceptions, motivations, habits) and external (e.g., models of care, appointment times) factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of recommended pain care. Provision of recommended pain care in rural settings can be facilitated by improving community norms, models of care, and reducing time pressures on providers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025007151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究调查影响农村医疗保健提供者提供指南推荐的疼痛护理的因素。作者团队开发了一种现实的方法来进行需求评估,以调查这些因素。现实主义程序理论通过现实主义者知情的访谈和面对面和在线焦点小组与澳大利亚农村医疗保健提供者谁支持受慢性疼痛影响的患者进行完善和巩固。数据被提取出来,并在数据收集的两轮之间迭代地进行追溯分析。行为的正式理论被用来解释这些发现。34个提供者参与了研究。研究发现,提供者提供指南推荐的疼痛护理的意图源于提供者内部因素的综合影响,包括提供者对克服障碍(例如,知识,技能)的感知控制,对患者流失风险的感知,以及遵守当地指南分歧规范的动机水平。这些意图是否会导致提供推荐的疼痛护理,与支持提供者患者的护理模式分配机会的外部因素有关,公共模式比私人和可补偿模式有更多的限制。此外,研究发现,农村医疗保健提供者在预约时间短和繁忙的实践日程造成的时间压力下,经常遇到挑战,这可能引发“快速实践习惯”,从而推翻提供者的积极意图。这些发现表明,调整社区规范与指导建议,改进限制提供者护理的护理模式,减少时间压力,可能是旨在改善澳大利亚农村指导建议的疼痛护理提供的倡议的有价值的目标。观点:内部因素(如知识、观念、动机、习惯)和外部因素(如护理模式、预约时间)影响农村医疗保健提供者提供推荐的疼痛护理。通过改善社区规范、护理模式和减少提供者的时间压力,可以促进在农村环境中提供推荐的疼痛护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting the provision of guideline-recommended pain care in rural Australia: A consolidated program theory from a realist needs assessment
Little research has investigated what factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of guideline-recommended pain care. The authorship team developed a realist approach to conducting a needs assessment to investigate such factors. A realist program theory was refined and consolidated through realist-informed interviews and in-person and online focus groups with rural Australian healthcare providers who support patients affected by chronic pain. Data were extracted and retroductively analysed iteratively between rounds of data collection. Formal theories of behaviour were referenced to interpret the findings. Thirty-four providers participated. It was uncovered that providers’ intentions to provide guideline-recommended pain care arise from the combined influence of factors internal to providers including providers’ perceived control to overcome barriers (e.g., knowledge, skills), perceptions regarding the risk of patient attrition, and level of motivation to comply with local guideline-divergent norms. Whether these intentions lead to provision of recommended pain care or not relates to factors external to providers regarding opportunities allotted by models of care that support the providers’ patients, with public models having more constraints than private and compensable models. Further, rural healthcare providers were found to consistently encounter challenges under time pressures caused by short appointment times and busy practice schedules that could trigger ‘fast practice habits’ to override providers’ positive intentions. These findings suggest that aligning community norms with guideline-recommendations, improving models of care that constrain providers’ care, and reducing time pressures, may be worthwhile targets for initiatives that aim to improve the provision of guideline-recommended pain care in rural Australia.

Perspective

Internal (e.g., knowledge, perceptions, motivations, habits) and external (e.g., models of care, appointment times) factors affect rural healthcare providers’ provision of recommended pain care. Provision of recommended pain care in rural settings can be facilitated by improving community norms, models of care, and reducing time pressures on providers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信