早期胃癌淋巴结转移的形态学预测因素。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Halil Alper Bozkurt, Leman Damla Ercan, Inan Guden, Melek Buyuk, Mehmet Ilhan, Ali Fuat Kaan Gok, Mustafa Kayihan Gunay
{"title":"早期胃癌淋巴结转移的形态学预测因素。","authors":"Halil Alper Bozkurt, Leman Damla Ercan, Inan Guden, Melek Buyuk, Mehmet Ilhan, Ali Fuat Kaan Gok, Mustafa Kayihan Gunay","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03019-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis has gained significant importance in recent years due to changes in treatment strategies. Ensuring the absence of lymph node metastasis is crucial in the management of early gastric cancer. This consideration can help avoid radical treatments and facilitate organ-sparing approaches. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate early gastric adenocarcinoma (T1a-b) cases treated with radical surgery and identify the factors that affect lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 360 patients who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed, and 41 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer were included in the study. The relationship between patient age, gender, tumor stage, tumor size, tumor location, histological subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, ulceration, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and lymph node metastases was analyzed. A cumulative risk score was developed using significant predictors to stratify patients into risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 63 years and 66% male. Notably, none of the 14 patients with T1a exhibited lymph node metastasis, whereas 10 of 27 (37%) patients with T1b presented with lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor stage (p = 0.009), tumor differentiation (p = 0.043), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified a significant association between lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.024) and tumor size (p = 0.05) with lymph node metastasis. The proposed risk scoring system effectively stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Examination of radical surgical specimens suggests that organ-preserving methods based on expanded ESD criteria could be a viable option for our population. Tumor stage, histological subtype, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion were identified as factors influencing the incidence of lymph node metastasis, with tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion emerging as primary determinants. The exploratory scoring model may aid in risk-based clinical decision-making, particularly in selecting candidates for non-surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Halil Alper Bozkurt, Leman Damla Ercan, Inan Guden, Melek Buyuk, Mehmet Ilhan, Ali Fuat Kaan Gok, Mustafa Kayihan Gunay\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-03019-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis has gained significant importance in recent years due to changes in treatment strategies. Ensuring the absence of lymph node metastasis is crucial in the management of early gastric cancer. This consideration can help avoid radical treatments and facilitate organ-sparing approaches. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate early gastric adenocarcinoma (T1a-b) cases treated with radical surgery and identify the factors that affect lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 360 patients who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed, and 41 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer were included in the study. The relationship between patient age, gender, tumor stage, tumor size, tumor location, histological subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, ulceration, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and lymph node metastases was analyzed. A cumulative risk score was developed using significant predictors to stratify patients into risk groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 63 years and 66% male. Notably, none of the 14 patients with T1a exhibited lymph node metastasis, whereas 10 of 27 (37%) patients with T1b presented with lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor stage (p = 0.009), tumor differentiation (p = 0.043), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified a significant association between lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.024) and tumor size (p = 0.05) with lymph node metastasis. The proposed risk scoring system effectively stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Examination of radical surgical specimens suggests that organ-preserving methods based on expanded ESD criteria could be a viable option for our population. Tumor stage, histological subtype, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion were identified as factors influencing the incidence of lymph node metastasis, with tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion emerging as primary determinants. The exploratory scoring model may aid in risk-based clinical decision-making, particularly in selecting candidates for non-surgical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231994/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03019-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03019-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,由于治疗策略的改变,预测淋巴结转移的能力变得非常重要。在早期胃癌的治疗中,确保没有淋巴结转移是至关重要的。这种考虑有助于避免根治性治疗和促进器官保留方法。本研究旨在回顾性评估早期胃腺癌(T1a-b)根治性手术治疗的病例,并确定影响淋巴结转移的因素。方法:回顾性分析360例接受胃腺癌手术治疗的患者,其中41例早期诊断为胃癌。分析患者年龄、性别、肿瘤分期、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、组织学亚型、淋巴血管浸润、神经周围浸润、溃疡、肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞、淋巴结转移的关系。累积风险评分采用显著的预测因子将患者分为不同的风险组。结果:研究队列包括41例患者,平均年龄63岁,其中66%为男性。值得注意的是,14例T1a患者中没有一例出现淋巴结转移,而27例T1b患者中有10例(37%)出现淋巴结转移。单因素分析显示,肿瘤分期(p = 0.009)、肿瘤分化(p = 0.043)和淋巴血管浸润(p = 0.006)是淋巴结转移的显著预测因素。多因素分析发现淋巴血管浸润(p = 0.024)和肿瘤大小(p = 0.05)与淋巴结转移有显著相关性。提出的风险评分系统有效地将患者分为低、中、高风险组。结论:根治性手术标本的检查表明,基于扩展ESD标准的器官保存方法可能是我们人群的可行选择。肿瘤分期、组织学亚型、肿瘤大小和淋巴血管浸润是影响淋巴结转移发生率的因素,其中肿瘤分期和淋巴血管浸润是主要决定因素。探索性评分模型可能有助于基于风险的临床决策,特别是在选择非手术治疗的候选人时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphological predictors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Background: The ability to predict the presence of lymph node metastasis has gained significant importance in recent years due to changes in treatment strategies. Ensuring the absence of lymph node metastasis is crucial in the management of early gastric cancer. This consideration can help avoid radical treatments and facilitate organ-sparing approaches. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate early gastric adenocarcinoma (T1a-b) cases treated with radical surgery and identify the factors that affect lymph node metastasis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 360 patients who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma were reviewed, and 41 patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer were included in the study. The relationship between patient age, gender, tumor stage, tumor size, tumor location, histological subtype, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, ulceration, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and lymph node metastases was analyzed. A cumulative risk score was developed using significant predictors to stratify patients into risk groups.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 41 patients, with a mean age of 63 years and 66% male. Notably, none of the 14 patients with T1a exhibited lymph node metastasis, whereas 10 of 27 (37%) patients with T1b presented with lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor stage (p = 0.009), tumor differentiation (p = 0.043), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.006) were significant predictors of lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified a significant association between lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.024) and tumor size (p = 0.05) with lymph node metastasis. The proposed risk scoring system effectively stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups.

Conclusion: Examination of radical surgical specimens suggests that organ-preserving methods based on expanded ESD criteria could be a viable option for our population. Tumor stage, histological subtype, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion were identified as factors influencing the incidence of lymph node metastasis, with tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion emerging as primary determinants. The exploratory scoring model may aid in risk-based clinical decision-making, particularly in selecting candidates for non-surgical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信