继续医学教育活动中的多样性、包容性和偏见:从参与者评价中吸取的教训。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2525170
Melissa D Bregger, Celia Laird O'Brien, Oluwateniola E Brown, Linda Suleiman, Sheryl A Corey, Clara J Schroedl
{"title":"继续医学教育活动中的多样性、包容性和偏见:从参与者评价中吸取的教训。","authors":"Melissa D Bregger, Celia Laird O'Brien, Oluwateniola E Brown, Linda Suleiman, Sheryl A Corey, Clara J Schroedl","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2525170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recommendations to ensure diverse, equitable, and inclusive content in Continuing Medical Education (CME) have been developed, however, learners' perception of these efforts are unknown. Learner recognition of biased or non-inclusive content and satisfaction with activity diversity provides insight into the success of bias mitigation efforts during CME planning and delivery. This study's objective was to evaluate the types of bias identified by learners, and to evaluate learners' perception of inclusivity and satisfaction with the diversity of CME activities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a retrospective mixed methods analysis of post-activity evaluation comments from 210 CME activities and 5,284 evaluations at a large Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME)-accredited academic healthcare system from September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity in 98.9% of activities. The qualitative analysis included 967 comments and demonstrated four main categories of perceived bias or lack of diversity identified by the CME activity learners: 1) Bias related to social identity factors, of which racial, ethnic, and gender bias were the most common forms identified by learners; 2) Lack of diversity in speakers, content and delivery; 3) Resistance to bias and inclusion evaluation questions; and 4) Commercial/industry bias. Further, some learners noted the instructional design of certain activities was not inclusive of all learners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that some CME activity learners perceive various forms of bias and lack of inclusivity and diversity despite efforts to review and mitigate bias in the planning and delivery of CME. While most CME activity learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity, the data can inform more targeted efforts during the CME planning phase that focus on speaker and content diversity and screening for bias that goes beyond traditional industry/commercial bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2525170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity, inclusion, and bias in Continuing Medical Education activities: lessons learned from participant evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa D Bregger, Celia Laird O'Brien, Oluwateniola E Brown, Linda Suleiman, Sheryl A Corey, Clara J Schroedl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2025.2525170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recommendations to ensure diverse, equitable, and inclusive content in Continuing Medical Education (CME) have been developed, however, learners' perception of these efforts are unknown. Learner recognition of biased or non-inclusive content and satisfaction with activity diversity provides insight into the success of bias mitigation efforts during CME planning and delivery. This study's objective was to evaluate the types of bias identified by learners, and to evaluate learners' perception of inclusivity and satisfaction with the diversity of CME activities.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study was a retrospective mixed methods analysis of post-activity evaluation comments from 210 CME activities and 5,284 evaluations at a large Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME)-accredited academic healthcare system from September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity in 98.9% of activities. The qualitative analysis included 967 comments and demonstrated four main categories of perceived bias or lack of diversity identified by the CME activity learners: 1) Bias related to social identity factors, of which racial, ethnic, and gender bias were the most common forms identified by learners; 2) Lack of diversity in speakers, content and delivery; 3) Resistance to bias and inclusion evaluation questions; and 4) Commercial/industry bias. Further, some learners noted the instructional design of certain activities was not inclusive of all learners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that some CME activity learners perceive various forms of bias and lack of inclusivity and diversity despite efforts to review and mitigate bias in the planning and delivery of CME. While most CME activity learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity, the data can inform more targeted efforts during the CME planning phase that focus on speaker and content diversity and screening for bias that goes beyond traditional industry/commercial bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2525170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2525170\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2525170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:已经制定了确保继续医学教育(CME)内容多样化、公平和包容性的建议,然而,学习者对这些努力的看法尚不清楚。学习者对有偏见或非包容性内容的认识以及对活动多样性的满意度,可以深入了解在继续教育规划和交付期间减少偏见的努力是否成功。本研究的目的是评估学习者识别的偏见类型,并评估学习者对继续教育活动多样性的包容性和满意度。研究设计:本研究是一项回顾性混合方法分析,从2022年9月1日至2023年12月31日,在一个大型继续医学教育认证委员会(ACCME)认可的学术医疗体系中,对210项CME活动和5284项评估进行了活动后评价。结果:98.9%的学习者对演讲者和内容的多样性感到满意。通过对967条评论的定性分析,发现CME活动学习者所感知到的偏见或缺乏多样性主要分为四类:1)与社会认同因素相关的偏见,其中种族、民族和性别偏见是学习者最常见的偏见形式;2)演讲者、演讲内容和演讲方式缺乏多样性;3)抗偏倚和包容性评价问题;4)商业/行业偏见。此外,一些学习者指出,某些活动的教学设计不包括所有学习者。结论:这些发现表明,尽管努力审查和减轻CME计划和交付中的偏见,但一些CME活动学习者感知到各种形式的偏见,缺乏包容性和多样性。虽然大多数CME活动学习者对演讲者和内容的多样性感到满意,但这些数据可以在CME计划阶段提供更有针对性的工作,重点关注演讲者和内容的多样性,并筛选超越传统行业/商业偏见的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity, inclusion, and bias in Continuing Medical Education activities: lessons learned from participant evaluations.

Purpose: Recommendations to ensure diverse, equitable, and inclusive content in Continuing Medical Education (CME) have been developed, however, learners' perception of these efforts are unknown. Learner recognition of biased or non-inclusive content and satisfaction with activity diversity provides insight into the success of bias mitigation efforts during CME planning and delivery. This study's objective was to evaluate the types of bias identified by learners, and to evaluate learners' perception of inclusivity and satisfaction with the diversity of CME activities.

Study design: This study was a retrospective mixed methods analysis of post-activity evaluation comments from 210 CME activities and 5,284 evaluations at a large Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME)-accredited academic healthcare system from September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023.

Results: Learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity in 98.9% of activities. The qualitative analysis included 967 comments and demonstrated four main categories of perceived bias or lack of diversity identified by the CME activity learners: 1) Bias related to social identity factors, of which racial, ethnic, and gender bias were the most common forms identified by learners; 2) Lack of diversity in speakers, content and delivery; 3) Resistance to bias and inclusion evaluation questions; and 4) Commercial/industry bias. Further, some learners noted the instructional design of certain activities was not inclusive of all learners.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that some CME activity learners perceive various forms of bias and lack of inclusivity and diversity despite efforts to review and mitigate bias in the planning and delivery of CME. While most CME activity learners were satisfied with speaker and content diversity, the data can inform more targeted efforts during the CME planning phase that focus on speaker and content diversity and screening for bias that goes beyond traditional industry/commercial bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信