3d打印多孔钛合金与聚醚醚酮笼治疗颅椎畸形寰枢关节内融合术疗效比较

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-04 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148
Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan
{"title":"3d打印多孔钛合金与聚醚醚酮笼治疗颅椎畸形寰枢关节内融合术疗效比较","authors":"Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"361-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes between 3D-printed porous titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone cages for atlantoaxial intra-articular fusion in craniovertebral malformations.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"361-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:寰枢关节内牵张融合技术包括关节内松解、牵张和关节笼植入,常用于治疗颅椎骨畸形。聚醚醚酮(PEEK)保持器用于C1-2关节内融合已有十多年的历史。三维打印在脊柱外科中是一种新兴的方法,一些研究已经探索了用于椎间融合的3d打印多孔钛合金(3DPT)笼。然而,关于它们在C1-2关节内融合中的应用和比较的研究有限。在这项研究中,作者旨在比较C1-2关节内PEEK笼与3DPT笼的结果。方法:回顾性分析C1-2关节内笼植入治疗颅椎畸形患者的临床资料。比较PEEK和3DPT在术前、术后和随访3个时间点的正中矢状面参数。其他评估包括临床缓解、复位丢失、融合失败、笼微动和螺钉棒失效。进行单因素比较。结果:回顾60例患者的记录,平均年龄43.75±13.48岁;颅底凹陷是最常见的畸形。3DPT和PEEK笼具有相当的即时复位效果。然而,在随访期间,3DPT笼表现出良好的复位维持、增强的融合率和减少的笼微动。3DPT组和PEEK组的融合率分别为100%和80.6%。融合失败与临床不缓解、PEEK保持器、畸形复发、复位丢失和保持器微动相关,但与螺钉棒构建失败无关。结论:融合失败显著影响长期预后。3DPT固定架是一种可行的选择,可以通过减少复位损失、防止融合失败和减少固定架微动来改善长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of outcomes between 3D-printed porous titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone cages for atlantoaxial intra-articular fusion in craniovertebral malformations.

Objective: The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.

Methods: Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.

Results: Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.

Conclusions: Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信