Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan
{"title":"3d打印多孔钛合金与聚醚醚酮笼治疗颅椎畸形寰枢关节内融合术疗效比较","authors":"Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"361-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes between 3D-printed porous titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone cages for atlantoaxial intra-articular fusion in craniovertebral malformations.\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Jian, Zhe Hou, Xingang Zhao, Cong Liang, Yinqian Wang, Dongao Zhang, Kun Wu, Jichao Wang, Tao Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"361-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of outcomes between 3D-printed porous titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone cages for atlantoaxial intra-articular fusion in craniovertebral malformations.
Objective: The atlantoaxial intra-articular distraction and fusion technique involves intra-articular release, distraction, and cage implantation and is commonly used to treat craniovertebral bony malformations. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for C1-2 intra-articular fusion have been in use for over a decade. Three-dimensional printing is an emerging approach in spinal surgery, and several studies have explored 3D-printed porous titanium alloy (3DPT) cages for interbody fusion. However, there is limited research on their application and comparisons for C1-2 intra-articular fusion. In this study, the authors aimed to compare the outcomes of C1-2 intra-articular PEEK cages with those of 3DPT cages.
Methods: Clinical data from patients with craniovertebral anomalies treated with C1-2 intra-articular cage implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Midsagittal parameters were compared between PEEK and 3DPT and at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and follow-up. Other assessments included clinical remission, reduction loss, fusion failure, cage micromotion, and screw-rod failure. Univariate comparisons were conducted.
Results: Records of 60 patients were reviewed, with a mean age of 43.75 ± 13.48 years; basilar invagination was the most common deformity. The 3DPT and PEEK cages demonstrated comparable immediate reduction effects. However, during follow-up, the 3DPT cage exhibited superior reduction maintenance, enhanced fusion rates, and reduced cage micromotion. Fusion rates were 100% and 80.6% in the 3DPT and PEEK groups, respectively. Fusion failure was associated with clinical nonremission, PEEK cage, deformity relapse, reduction loss, and cage micromotion, but was not associated with screw-rod construct failure.
Conclusions: Fusion failure significantly undermines long-term outcomes. The 3DPT cage is a viable option for improving long-term results by minimizing loss of reduction, preventing fusion failure, and reducing cage micromotion.
期刊介绍:
Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.