两种可插入装置模型对产科瘘非手术治疗的有效性和可接受性:一项混合I型随机交叉试验方案

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nessa Ryan, Gabriel Y K Ganyaglo, Joonhee Park, Tracy Kuo Lin, Joanna Pozen, Avni Mittal, Alison M El Ayadi
{"title":"两种可插入装置模型对产科瘘非手术治疗的有效性和可接受性:一项混合I型随机交叉试验方案","authors":"Nessa Ryan, Gabriel Y K Ganyaglo, Joonhee Park, Tracy Kuo Lin, Joanna Pozen, Avni Mittal, Alison M El Ayadi","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03823-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric fistula is a traumatic and stigmatized maternal morbidity often resulting in severe urinary and fecal incontinence. Women with fistula face multi-level barriers to surgical repair culminating in delays. Unfortunately, no acceptable temporizing measures to contain incontinence of urine exists. An insertable vaginal cup, alone or connected to a leg bag, has potential for improving incontinence management for women awaiting surgery or those whom surgery was unsuccessful, but effectiveness and acceptability are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a four-year clinical trial and nested qualitative study to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence and understand fistula management costs. Two intervention models will be compared to a control: (1) vaginal cup ('cup'), and (2) vaginal cup attached via tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+'). Using a cross-over design, up to 100 participants will be block randomized to one of two sequences of leaking freely (no intervention), cup, and cup + at four fistula centers in Ghana and Kenya and observed for four days (400 total observations). Data will be captured through interviewer-administered survey, clinical exam and checklist. After clinic-based assessment, participants are individually randomized for cup or cup + for home use for up to 3 months and surveyed monthly. Effectiveness will be evaluated through quantitative comparison of urinary leakage (6 h and 24 h) and patient-reported quality of life (1-3 months) between cup, cup+, and leaking freely. Acceptability will be assessed quantitatively (1-3 months) and via in-depth interview among selected trial participants (n ~ 30) and potential implementers (n ~ 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This implementation study will inform the effectiveness and acceptability of the cup and cup + interventions as temporizing management strategies for fistula urinary incontinence. If the cup/cup + is effective and acceptable, this study will provide insight for future trials and cost-effective assessments in settings where fistula is prevalent. Expanding the evidence base on non-surgical temporizing management options will inform comprehensive fistula care through tertiary prevention and is likely to reduce vulnerability to stigma and improve economic opportunity and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registrations and dates: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504 (Date of registration: July 6, 2022). Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202,209,466,217,416 (Date of registration: 9/22/2022). Ghana FDA Certificate FDA/CT/231 (Date of approval: 3/30/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and acceptability of two insertable device models for non-surgical management of obstetric fistula: protocol for a hybrid type I randomized crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nessa Ryan, Gabriel Y K Ganyaglo, Joonhee Park, Tracy Kuo Lin, Joanna Pozen, Avni Mittal, Alison M El Ayadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03823-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric fistula is a traumatic and stigmatized maternal morbidity often resulting in severe urinary and fecal incontinence. Women with fistula face multi-level barriers to surgical repair culminating in delays. Unfortunately, no acceptable temporizing measures to contain incontinence of urine exists. An insertable vaginal cup, alone or connected to a leg bag, has potential for improving incontinence management for women awaiting surgery or those whom surgery was unsuccessful, but effectiveness and acceptability are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe a four-year clinical trial and nested qualitative study to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence and understand fistula management costs. Two intervention models will be compared to a control: (1) vaginal cup ('cup'), and (2) vaginal cup attached via tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+'). Using a cross-over design, up to 100 participants will be block randomized to one of two sequences of leaking freely (no intervention), cup, and cup + at four fistula centers in Ghana and Kenya and observed for four days (400 total observations). Data will be captured through interviewer-administered survey, clinical exam and checklist. After clinic-based assessment, participants are individually randomized for cup or cup + for home use for up to 3 months and surveyed monthly. Effectiveness will be evaluated through quantitative comparison of urinary leakage (6 h and 24 h) and patient-reported quality of life (1-3 months) between cup, cup+, and leaking freely. Acceptability will be assessed quantitatively (1-3 months) and via in-depth interview among selected trial participants (n ~ 30) and potential implementers (n ~ 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This implementation study will inform the effectiveness and acceptability of the cup and cup + interventions as temporizing management strategies for fistula urinary incontinence. If the cup/cup + is effective and acceptable, this study will provide insight for future trials and cost-effective assessments in settings where fistula is prevalent. Expanding the evidence base on non-surgical temporizing management options will inform comprehensive fistula care through tertiary prevention and is likely to reduce vulnerability to stigma and improve economic opportunity and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registrations and dates: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504 (Date of registration: July 6, 2022). Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202,209,466,217,416 (Date of registration: 9/22/2022). Ghana FDA Certificate FDA/CT/231 (Date of approval: 3/30/2023).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03823-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03823-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科瘘是一种创伤性和污名化的产妇疾病,经常导致严重的尿失禁和大便失禁。妇女瘘面临手术修复的多层次障碍,最终导致延误。不幸的是,没有可接受的临时措施来控制尿失禁存在。可插入阴道杯,单独使用或与腿袋连接,有可能改善等待手术或手术失败的妇女的尿失禁管理,但有效性和可接受性尚不清楚。方法:我们描述了一项为期四年的临床试验和嵌套定性研究,以检查可插入阴道杯治疗瘘尿失禁的有效性和可接受性,并了解瘘管理成本。将两种干预模型与对照进行比较:(1)阴道杯(“杯”)和(2)阴道杯通过管道连接到腿部固定的尿液收集袋(“杯+”)。采用交叉设计,在加纳和肯尼亚的四个瘘管中心,多达100名参与者将被随机分组到自由渗漏(无干预)、杯子和杯子+两个序列中的一个,并观察四天(总共400次观察)。数据将通过访谈者管理的调查、临床检查和检查表来获取。在临床评估后,参与者被随机分配为家庭使用杯子或杯子+,为期3个月,每月进行一次调查。通过定量比较尿漏(6小时和24小时)和患者报告的生活质量(1-3个月)来评估尿漏效果。可接受性将进行定量评估(1-3个月),并通过对选定的试验参与者(n ~ 30)和潜在实施者(n ~ 20)进行深入访谈。讨论:本实施研究将告知便盆和便盆+干预措施作为瘘管性尿失禁的临时管理策略的有效性和可接受性。如果杯子/杯子+是有效的和可接受的,这项研究将为未来的试验和成本效益评估提供见解,瘘管是普遍存在的设置。扩大非手术临时管理选择的证据基础,将通过三级预防为瘘管病的全面护理提供信息,并可能减少对耻辱的脆弱性,改善经济机会和生活质量。试验注册和日期:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504(注册日期:2022年7月6日)。泛非临床试验注册编号202,209,466,217,416(注册日期:9/22/2022)。加纳FDA证书FDA/CT/231(批准日期:2023年3月30日)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and acceptability of two insertable device models for non-surgical management of obstetric fistula: protocol for a hybrid type I randomized crossover trial.

Background: Obstetric fistula is a traumatic and stigmatized maternal morbidity often resulting in severe urinary and fecal incontinence. Women with fistula face multi-level barriers to surgical repair culminating in delays. Unfortunately, no acceptable temporizing measures to contain incontinence of urine exists. An insertable vaginal cup, alone or connected to a leg bag, has potential for improving incontinence management for women awaiting surgery or those whom surgery was unsuccessful, but effectiveness and acceptability are unknown.

Methods: We describe a four-year clinical trial and nested qualitative study to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence and understand fistula management costs. Two intervention models will be compared to a control: (1) vaginal cup ('cup'), and (2) vaginal cup attached via tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+'). Using a cross-over design, up to 100 participants will be block randomized to one of two sequences of leaking freely (no intervention), cup, and cup + at four fistula centers in Ghana and Kenya and observed for four days (400 total observations). Data will be captured through interviewer-administered survey, clinical exam and checklist. After clinic-based assessment, participants are individually randomized for cup or cup + for home use for up to 3 months and surveyed monthly. Effectiveness will be evaluated through quantitative comparison of urinary leakage (6 h and 24 h) and patient-reported quality of life (1-3 months) between cup, cup+, and leaking freely. Acceptability will be assessed quantitatively (1-3 months) and via in-depth interview among selected trial participants (n ~ 30) and potential implementers (n ~ 20).

Discussion: This implementation study will inform the effectiveness and acceptability of the cup and cup + interventions as temporizing management strategies for fistula urinary incontinence. If the cup/cup + is effective and acceptable, this study will provide insight for future trials and cost-effective assessments in settings where fistula is prevalent. Expanding the evidence base on non-surgical temporizing management options will inform comprehensive fistula care through tertiary prevention and is likely to reduce vulnerability to stigma and improve economic opportunity and quality of life.

Trial registrations and dates: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05444504 (Date of registration: July 6, 2022). Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202,209,466,217,416 (Date of registration: 9/22/2022). Ghana FDA Certificate FDA/CT/231 (Date of approval: 3/30/2023).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信